简评凯恩斯主义经济学

M. Davidsson
{"title":"简评凯恩斯主义经济学","authors":"M. Davidsson","doi":"10.5296/JSR.V4I1.3168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we will discuss the strength (austerity does not work) and the weakness (Quantitative Easing) of Keynesian economics. We will describe the ergodic hypothesis which plays a critical role in Keynesian economics. We will also try to provide an answer to the question: What role does people, debt and ensemble and time averages play in macroeconomics? The conclusion of the paper is that it was a mistake to abandon the gold standard (which Keynes argued for) because it gave price stability i.e. no fiat money.","PeriodicalId":127579,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)","volume":"05 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple Comment on Keynesian Economics\",\"authors\":\"M. Davidsson\",\"doi\":\"10.5296/JSR.V4I1.3168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we will discuss the strength (austerity does not work) and the weakness (Quantitative Easing) of Keynesian economics. We will describe the ergodic hypothesis which plays a critical role in Keynesian economics. We will also try to provide an answer to the question: What role does people, debt and ensemble and time averages play in macroeconomics? The conclusion of the paper is that it was a mistake to abandon the gold standard (which Keynes argued for) because it gave price stability i.e. no fiat money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"05 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5296/JSR.V4I1.3168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/JSR.V4I1.3168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将讨论凯恩斯主义经济学的优点(紧缩不起作用)和缺点(量化宽松)。我们将描述在凯恩斯主义经济学中起关键作用的遍历假说。我们还将尝试为以下问题提供答案:人、债务、总量和时间平均在宏观经济学中扮演什么角色?这篇论文的结论是,放弃金本位(凯恩斯主张的)是一个错误,因为它提供了价格稳定,即没有法定货币。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Simple Comment on Keynesian Economics
In this paper we will discuss the strength (austerity does not work) and the weakness (Quantitative Easing) of Keynesian economics. We will describe the ergodic hypothesis which plays a critical role in Keynesian economics. We will also try to provide an answer to the question: What role does people, debt and ensemble and time averages play in macroeconomics? The conclusion of the paper is that it was a mistake to abandon the gold standard (which Keynes argued for) because it gave price stability i.e. no fiat money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary Macroeconomic Outcomes: A Tragedy in Three Acts The Optimized Monetary Policy ZLB Mandate in NK Behavioural and RE Models Compared A Note Concerning Government Bond Yields Monetary Policy and the Wage Inflation-Unemployment Tradeoff A Quadratic-Cubic Approximation of Optimal Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1