M. Jaelani, Abdul Mukmin
{"title":"KAJIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN BANGUNAN DI ATAS HAK PAKAI ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DI BATALKAN (Di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan Dan Hak Pakai Atas Tanah)","authors":"M. Jaelani, Abdul Mukmin","doi":"10.24903/yrs.v10i2.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to use is regulated in Article 41 through Article 43 which is further regulated in Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Right to Cultivate, Right to Build and Right to Use of Land Article 41 to Article 58. In Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Basic Agrarian Law, is defined as the Right to Use is the right to use and / or collect proceeds from land that is directly controlled by the state or land of the Property of another person, who gives authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by an official authorized to give it or in an agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything originating does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this law.So that the cause of the cancellation of the second right is the position of the building above the usufructuary rights to the land that has been cancelled. The position of the building this case is not only in the physical sense concerning the location and magnitude of the building alone, more than that it has a legal meaning concerning the legal position of the building. This is related to ownership rights and land rights attached to it. The method used in this study is a normative research study with legislation as primary legal material, books, literature as secondary legal material and information and data as secondary material from this study.In principle, the matter that causes the Right to Use of Land can be canceled is the expiration of the term or canceled by the authorized official, the management right holder or the landowner before the expiry date, released voluntarily by the right holder before the term expires, the right of use is revoked, abandoned, the land is destroyed and the Right of Use holder does not qualify as the Right to Use holder. Whereas in relation to the position of the building above the Use of Land Rights by the Indonesian Citizen who has been cancelled depends on the agreement that accompanies when the right to use is granted, but for foreigners through the right to use can transfer their assets through inheritance.","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i2.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《土地使用权法》第41条至第43条对土地使用权进行了规定,1996年第40号《耕地权、建设权和土地使用权条例》第41条至第58条对土地使用权作了进一步规定。第四十一条(1)款法律基本农业法律的定义是正确的使用是正确的使用和/或收集所得的土地是由国家直接控制的另一个人的财产或土地,谁给的权力和义务中指定决定给予其官方授权给它或者在与土地的所有者达成协议,而不是一个租赁协议或土地处理协议,凡源于本法的,不得与本法精神和规定相抵触。第二项权利被取消的原因是该建筑的位置高于被取消的土地的用益物权。在这个案例中,建筑物的位置不仅在物理意义上与建筑物的位置和大小有关,而且在法律意义上与建筑物的法律位置有关。这与所有权和附带的土地权有关。本研究采用的方法是以立法为主要法律资料,书籍、文献为次要法律资料,本研究的信息和数据为次要资料的规范性研究方法。原则上,导致土地使用权可以撤销的事项是:土地使用权期满或在期满前被授权官员、经营权持有人或土地所有人撤销,权利持有人在期限届满前自愿解除,使用权被撤销、放弃,土地被破坏,使用权持有人不具备使用权持有人资格。而关于建筑物上面的位置,被取消的印尼公民的土地使用权取决于授予使用权时所附带的协议,但对于通过使用权的外国人可以通过继承转让其资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KAJIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN BANGUNAN DI ATAS HAK PAKAI ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DI BATALKAN (Di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan Dan Hak Pakai Atas Tanah)
The right to use is regulated in Article 41 through Article 43 which is further regulated in Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Right to Cultivate, Right to Build and Right to Use of Land Article 41 to Article 58. In Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Basic Agrarian Law, is defined as the Right to Use is the right to use and / or collect proceeds from land that is directly controlled by the state or land of the Property of another person, who gives authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by an official authorized to give it or in an agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything originating does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this law.So that the cause of the cancellation of the second right is the position of the building above the usufructuary rights to the land that has been cancelled. The position of the building this case is not only in the physical sense concerning the location and magnitude of the building alone, more than that it has a legal meaning concerning the legal position of the building. This is related to ownership rights and land rights attached to it. The method used in this study is a normative research study with legislation as primary legal material, books, literature as secondary legal material and information and data as secondary material from this study.In principle, the matter that causes the Right to Use of Land can be canceled is the expiration of the term or canceled by the authorized official, the management right holder or the landowner before the expiry date, released voluntarily by the right holder before the term expires, the right of use is revoked, abandoned, the land is destroyed and the Right of Use holder does not qualify as the Right to Use holder. Whereas in relation to the position of the building above the Use of Land Rights by the Indonesian Citizen who has been cancelled depends on the agreement that accompanies when the right to use is granted, but for foreigners through the right to use can transfer their assets through inheritance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pencemaran Nama Baik Partai Politik Melalui Media Sosial Pembuktian Penyalahguna Narkotika Dalam Rangka Penerapan Asas Restorative Justice Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Lain-Lain Dalam Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Tanggung Jawab Pidana Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Telah Dibuat Pengedaran Sediaan Farmasi Oleh Anak Dalam Prespektif Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1