误解的危险在欧洲法院的最新实践

Milica Šutova, Ksenija Paunović
{"title":"误解的危险在欧洲法院的最新实践","authors":"Milica Šutova, Ksenija Paunović","doi":"10.46793/xixmajsko.491s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of similarity of trademarks and products has as much to do with the likelihood of confusion as a specific requirement for protection. In order to determine the danger of misconception, numerous circumstances should be taken into account, especially the known trademark on the market, the degree of similarity between the trademark and the sign, as well as between the products and services with which they are marked, and the relationship established between the new signs and the trademark. The authors analyze the decision of the European Court of Justice in case C-766/18, through Article 10 of the preamble of Directive 89/104 and Article 66 of Directive 207/2009 and through the prism of legal theoretical concepts they give their opinions and recommendation.","PeriodicalId":325482,"journal":{"name":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE DANGER OF MISCONCEPTION IN THE LATEST PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE\",\"authors\":\"Milica Šutova, Ksenija Paunović\",\"doi\":\"10.46793/xixmajsko.491s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of similarity of trademarks and products has as much to do with the likelihood of confusion as a specific requirement for protection. In order to determine the danger of misconception, numerous circumstances should be taken into account, especially the known trademark on the market, the degree of similarity between the trademark and the sign, as well as between the products and services with which they are marked, and the relationship established between the new signs and the trademark. The authors analyze the decision of the European Court of Justice in case C-766/18, through Article 10 of the preamble of Directive 89/104 and Article 66 of Directive 207/2009 and through the prism of legal theoretical concepts they give their opinions and recommendation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.491s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.491s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

商标和产品相似的概念既与混淆的可能性有关,也与保护的具体要求有关。为了确定误解的危险,应该考虑许多情况,特别是市场上已知的商标,商标与标志之间的相似程度,以及它们所标记的产品和服务之间的相似程度,以及新标志与商标之间建立的关系。作者通过89/104号指令序言第10条和207/2009号指令第66条,通过法律理论概念的棱镜,分析了欧洲法院在C-766/18号案件中的决定,并给出了他们的意见和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE DANGER OF MISCONCEPTION IN THE LATEST PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
The notion of similarity of trademarks and products has as much to do with the likelihood of confusion as a specific requirement for protection. In order to determine the danger of misconception, numerous circumstances should be taken into account, especially the known trademark on the market, the degree of similarity between the trademark and the sign, as well as between the products and services with which they are marked, and the relationship established between the new signs and the trademark. The authors analyze the decision of the European Court of Justice in case C-766/18, through Article 10 of the preamble of Directive 89/104 and Article 66 of Directive 207/2009 and through the prism of legal theoretical concepts they give their opinions and recommendation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PRIMENA „BALANCED SCORECARD“ MODELA U BANKARSKOM POSLOVANjU PRAVNA REGULATIVA USLUGA PRIVATNE BEZBEDNOSTI U SRBIJI I EU PUNOMOĆJE DATO U INOSTRANSTVU ZA ZAKLjUČENjE UGOVORA O PROMETU NEPOKRETNOSTI KOJA SE NALAZI U DOMAĆOJ DRŽAVI – NEKOLIKO NAPOMENA IZ UGLA MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA SRBIJE I MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA CRNE GORE EKSPROPRIJACIJA KAO PREDUSLOV ZA PRUŽANjE USLUGA OD OPŠTEG INTERESA PRUŽANjE USLUGA KULTURNO-UMETNIČKIH DRUŠTAVA I CENTARA ZA NEGOVANjE TRADICIONALNE KULTURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1