AISI 304L和347在压水堆水中的低周疲劳(EAF)

T. Seppänen, J. Alhainen, E. Arilahti, J. Solin
{"title":"AISI 304L和347在压水堆水中的低周疲劳(EAF)","authors":"T. Seppänen, J. Alhainen, E. Arilahti, J. Solin","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The update of the ASME III design fatigue curve for stainless steel in conjunction with the Fen model described in the NUREG/CR-6909 report has been criticized since publication. Data used to develop curves and models raises more questions than it answers.\n Material testing in a simulated light water reactor environment is difficult due to the temperature and pressure involved. The experimental challenge makes it tempting to take shortcuts where they should least be taken. Facing and overcoming the challenges, direct strain-controlled fatigue testing has been performed at VTT using a unique tailored-for-purpose EAF facility. The applicable ASTM standards E 606 and E1012 are followed to provide results that are directly compatible with ASME Code Section III.\n Several earlier PVP papers (PVP2016-63291, PVP2017-65374) report lower than calculated experimental Fen factors for stabilized stainless steels. In this paper new results, in line with the previous years’ conclusions, are presented for nonstabilized AISI 304L tested with dual strain rate waveforms.\n To model environmental effects more accurately, an approach accounting for the damaging effect of plastic strain is proposed. A draft Fen model, similar in structure to the NUREG model but with additional parameters, is shown to significantly improve the accuracy of Fen prediction.","PeriodicalId":128383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Cycle Fatigue (EAF) of AISI 304L and 347 in PWR Water\",\"authors\":\"T. Seppänen, J. Alhainen, E. Arilahti, J. Solin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-84197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The update of the ASME III design fatigue curve for stainless steel in conjunction with the Fen model described in the NUREG/CR-6909 report has been criticized since publication. Data used to develop curves and models raises more questions than it answers.\\n Material testing in a simulated light water reactor environment is difficult due to the temperature and pressure involved. The experimental challenge makes it tempting to take shortcuts where they should least be taken. Facing and overcoming the challenges, direct strain-controlled fatigue testing has been performed at VTT using a unique tailored-for-purpose EAF facility. The applicable ASTM standards E 606 and E1012 are followed to provide results that are directly compatible with ASME Code Section III.\\n Several earlier PVP papers (PVP2016-63291, PVP2017-65374) report lower than calculated experimental Fen factors for stabilized stainless steels. In this paper new results, in line with the previous years’ conclusions, are presented for nonstabilized AISI 304L tested with dual strain rate waveforms.\\n To model environmental effects more accurately, an approach accounting for the damaging effect of plastic strain is proposed. A draft Fen model, similar in structure to the NUREG model but with additional parameters, is shown to significantly improve the accuracy of Fen prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

ASME III不锈钢设计疲劳曲线的更新与NUREG/CR-6909报告中描述的Fen模型相结合,自发布以来一直受到批评。用于建立曲线和模型的数据提出的问题比它所回答的要多。由于涉及到温度和压力,在模拟轻水反应堆环境中进行材料测试是困难的。这种实验性的挑战使得人们很容易在最不应该走捷径的地方走捷径。面对并克服了这些挑战,在VTT使用独特的专用EAF设备进行了直接应变控制疲劳测试。遵循适用的ASTM标准e606和E1012,以提供与ASME规范第III部分直接兼容的结果。几篇较早的PVP论文(PVP2016-63291, PVP2017-65374)报告了稳定不锈钢的实验Fen因子低于计算值。本文给出了双应变率波形非稳定AISI 304L的新结果,与往年的结论一致。为了更准确地模拟环境效应,提出了一种考虑塑性应变破坏效应的方法。一个与NUREG模型结构相似但增加了参数的Fen模型草案可以显著提高Fen的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low Cycle Fatigue (EAF) of AISI 304L and 347 in PWR Water
The update of the ASME III design fatigue curve for stainless steel in conjunction with the Fen model described in the NUREG/CR-6909 report has been criticized since publication. Data used to develop curves and models raises more questions than it answers. Material testing in a simulated light water reactor environment is difficult due to the temperature and pressure involved. The experimental challenge makes it tempting to take shortcuts where they should least be taken. Facing and overcoming the challenges, direct strain-controlled fatigue testing has been performed at VTT using a unique tailored-for-purpose EAF facility. The applicable ASTM standards E 606 and E1012 are followed to provide results that are directly compatible with ASME Code Section III. Several earlier PVP papers (PVP2016-63291, PVP2017-65374) report lower than calculated experimental Fen factors for stabilized stainless steels. In this paper new results, in line with the previous years’ conclusions, are presented for nonstabilized AISI 304L tested with dual strain rate waveforms. To model environmental effects more accurately, an approach accounting for the damaging effect of plastic strain is proposed. A draft Fen model, similar in structure to the NUREG model but with additional parameters, is shown to significantly improve the accuracy of Fen prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Target Flaw Sizes of CASS Pipe for PD Approval Using PFM Code Preface Effect of Pre-Heat Treatment on Hydrogen Concentration Behavior of y-Grooved Weld Joint Based on a Coupled Analysis of Heat Transfer-Thermal Stress-Hydrogen Diffusion Hydrogen Diffusion Concentration Behaviors for Square Groove Weld Joint Cyclic, Monotonic and Fatigue Performance of Stabilized Stainless Steel in PWR Water and Research Laboratory Interlaboratory Study for Small Punch Testing Preliminary Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1