多源数据的闪电预警预报

M. A. Alves, B. A. Oliveira, Willian Maia, Waterson S. Soares, Douglas B. da S. Ferreira, Ana P. P. dos Santos, Fernando P. Silvestrow, Eugenio L. Daher, O. P. Júnior
{"title":"多源数据的闪电预警预报","authors":"M. A. Alves, B. A. Oliveira, Willian Maia, Waterson S. Soares, Douglas B. da S. Ferreira, Ana P. P. dos Santos, Fernando P. Silvestrow, Eugenio L. Daher, O. P. Júnior","doi":"10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe a new methodology for generating real-time lightning warning prediction by using a reliable multi-source data. To do so, it was used two years of data covering 50km radius over three regions in Brazil. For 5-minutes intervals, it was evaluated three approaches: a rule-based model that monitors an area of radius greater than the protected area, a machine learning model that considers the amount of lightning that hit small nearby regions, and an integrated approach that combines the two above. The results achieved, on average, about 80% of false alarm ratio, when the model generated an alert but no lightning strikes the area, 14% of failures, opposite to the previous one, had lightning without alert, 1% of the total time operations had to be stopped because of alerts, and 9 minutes of lead time between the generation of the alert and there is a lightning strike. A multi-criteria decision method was used to rank the best method for each location. Rule-based and Integrated models were preferred according to the importance of each criterion for stakeholders. Each methodology has its advantages and they can be extended to other areas according to business needs.","PeriodicalId":403323,"journal":{"name":"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","volume":"77 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lightning Warning Prediction with Multi-source Data\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Alves, B. A. Oliveira, Willian Maia, Waterson S. Soares, Douglas B. da S. Ferreira, Ana P. P. dos Santos, Fernando P. Silvestrow, Eugenio L. Daher, O. P. Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we describe a new methodology for generating real-time lightning warning prediction by using a reliable multi-source data. To do so, it was used two years of data covering 50km radius over three regions in Brazil. For 5-minutes intervals, it was evaluated three approaches: a rule-based model that monitors an area of radius greater than the protected area, a machine learning model that considers the amount of lightning that hit small nearby regions, and an integrated approach that combines the two above. The results achieved, on average, about 80% of false alarm ratio, when the model generated an alert but no lightning strikes the area, 14% of failures, opposite to the previous one, had lightning without alert, 1% of the total time operations had to be stopped because of alerts, and 9 minutes of lead time between the generation of the alert and there is a lightning strike. A multi-criteria decision method was used to rank the best method for each location. Rule-based and Integrated models were preferred according to the importance of each criterion for stakeholders. Each methodology has its advantages and they can be extended to other areas according to business needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)\",\"volume\":\"77 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 36th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP56858.2022.9942488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了一种利用可靠的多源数据生成实时闪电预警预报的新方法。为了做到这一点,它使用了巴西三个地区50公里半径的两年数据。每隔5分钟,对三种方法进行评估:一种基于规则的模型,监测半径大于保护区的区域;一种机器学习模型,考虑击中附近小区域的闪电数量;以及一种综合方法,将上述两种方法结合起来。结果表明,模型产生警报但没有雷击区域的误报率平均约为80%,14%的故障与前一次相反,有雷击而没有警报,由于警报而不得不停止运行的总时间占1%,警报产生到雷击之间的间隔时间为9分钟。采用多准则决策方法对每个位置的最佳方法进行排序。根据各标准对利益相关者的重要性,优选基于规则的模型和集成模型。每种方法都有其优点,并且可以根据业务需要将其扩展到其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lightning Warning Prediction with Multi-source Data
In this paper we describe a new methodology for generating real-time lightning warning prediction by using a reliable multi-source data. To do so, it was used two years of data covering 50km radius over three regions in Brazil. For 5-minutes intervals, it was evaluated three approaches: a rule-based model that monitors an area of radius greater than the protected area, a machine learning model that considers the amount of lightning that hit small nearby regions, and an integrated approach that combines the two above. The results achieved, on average, about 80% of false alarm ratio, when the model generated an alert but no lightning strikes the area, 14% of failures, opposite to the previous one, had lightning without alert, 1% of the total time operations had to be stopped because of alerts, and 9 minutes of lead time between the generation of the alert and there is a lightning strike. A multi-criteria decision method was used to rank the best method for each location. Rule-based and Integrated models were preferred according to the importance of each criterion for stakeholders. Each methodology has its advantages and they can be extended to other areas according to business needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thunderstorm types and meteorological characteristics of upward lightning Study of Power Equipment Trouble Caused by Lightning in Traction Substation An investigation of lightning impulse on earthing materials and fulgurites formation A Qualitative Research Approach to Study the Healing Powers of Plant Species against Lightning Used by South African Indigenous Communities of KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa Influence of Grounding Wires on Measured Frequency-Dependent Soil Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1