立法预算制度指标编制与完善研究——以60个国家现行制度比较分析为重点

Chunsoon Kim
{"title":"立法预算制度指标编制与完善研究——以60个国家现行制度比较分析为重点","authors":"Chunsoon Kim","doi":"10.1787/BUDGET-14-5JRW6591FRBW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legislative budget institutions are established and operated in different forms according to the various political and social experiences and financial circumstances of each country. Note, however, that research studies on the causes thereof are not only few in number but also focus mostly on the fact that legislative budget institutions are determined according to the “form of government”. In this light, this study establishes the comparison and analysis of the legislative budget institution of each country. The implication of this study is as follows. Firstly, this study approaches the Legislature’s capacity from a comprehensive and three-dimensional point of view in order to compile sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index. In other words, this study is to approach the financial authority vested to the Legislature and the Legislature’s capacity to exercise such authority from a comprehensive point of view in measuring such indices. Secondly, the accuracy of indices in this study has been improved by deriving relative weighting for sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index through AHP questionnaire surveys and analyses. In other words, AHP analysis can ensure the practicality and accuracy of measurement of indices and present a scheme to compile more universal and relevant indices. It is, however, necessary to consider sub-indices such as elements of legal system and related agencies. Also this study has a limitation in that it fails to fully explain the actual conditions of operation of institutions in the unique political, social, and economic settings of each country. JEL Classification: H11, H50, H83 Keywords: Legislative Budget Institution, Legislative Budget Institution Index, AHP","PeriodicalId":115409,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal on Budgeting","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on compilation and improvement of indices for legislative budgetary institutions: With focus on comparative analysis of current institutions in 60 countries\",\"authors\":\"Chunsoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/BUDGET-14-5JRW6591FRBW\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legislative budget institutions are established and operated in different forms according to the various political and social experiences and financial circumstances of each country. Note, however, that research studies on the causes thereof are not only few in number but also focus mostly on the fact that legislative budget institutions are determined according to the “form of government”. In this light, this study establishes the comparison and analysis of the legislative budget institution of each country. The implication of this study is as follows. Firstly, this study approaches the Legislature’s capacity from a comprehensive and three-dimensional point of view in order to compile sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index. In other words, this study is to approach the financial authority vested to the Legislature and the Legislature’s capacity to exercise such authority from a comprehensive point of view in measuring such indices. Secondly, the accuracy of indices in this study has been improved by deriving relative weighting for sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index through AHP questionnaire surveys and analyses. In other words, AHP analysis can ensure the practicality and accuracy of measurement of indices and present a scheme to compile more universal and relevant indices. It is, however, necessary to consider sub-indices such as elements of legal system and related agencies. Also this study has a limitation in that it fails to fully explain the actual conditions of operation of institutions in the unique political, social, and economic settings of each country. JEL Classification: H11, H50, H83 Keywords: Legislative Budget Institution, Legislative Budget Institution Index, AHP\",\"PeriodicalId\":115409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecd Journal on Budgeting\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecd Journal on Budgeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/BUDGET-14-5JRW6591FRBW\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal on Budgeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/BUDGET-14-5JRW6591FRBW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

立法预算机构是根据各国不同的政治和社会经验以及财政情况,以不同的形式建立和运作的。但需要注意的是,对其成因的研究不仅数量少,而且主要集中在立法预算机构是根据“政府形式”确定的这一事实上。在此基础上,本研究建立了对各国立法预算制度的比较分析。本研究的意义如下。首先,本文从全方位、立体化的角度考察立法机关的能力,编制各立法预算机构指数的子指数。换句话说,本研究就是要从综合的角度来衡量立法机关的财政权力,以及立法机关行使这种权力的能力。其次,通过AHP问卷调查和分析,得出各立法预算机构指标子指标的相对权重,提高了本研究指标的准确性。也就是说,层次分析法可以保证指标测量的实用性和准确性,为编制更具普遍性和相关性的指标提供方案。但是,有必要考虑法律制度要素和相关机构等分项指标。此外,本研究也有其局限性,即未能充分解释在每个国家独特的政治、社会和经济环境下机构运作的实际条件。关键词:立法预算制度,立法预算制度指数,层次分析法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study on compilation and improvement of indices for legislative budgetary institutions: With focus on comparative analysis of current institutions in 60 countries
Legislative budget institutions are established and operated in different forms according to the various political and social experiences and financial circumstances of each country. Note, however, that research studies on the causes thereof are not only few in number but also focus mostly on the fact that legislative budget institutions are determined according to the “form of government”. In this light, this study establishes the comparison and analysis of the legislative budget institution of each country. The implication of this study is as follows. Firstly, this study approaches the Legislature’s capacity from a comprehensive and three-dimensional point of view in order to compile sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index. In other words, this study is to approach the financial authority vested to the Legislature and the Legislature’s capacity to exercise such authority from a comprehensive point of view in measuring such indices. Secondly, the accuracy of indices in this study has been improved by deriving relative weighting for sub-indices of each legislative budgetary institution index through AHP questionnaire surveys and analyses. In other words, AHP analysis can ensure the practicality and accuracy of measurement of indices and present a scheme to compile more universal and relevant indices. It is, however, necessary to consider sub-indices such as elements of legal system and related agencies. Also this study has a limitation in that it fails to fully explain the actual conditions of operation of institutions in the unique political, social, and economic settings of each country. JEL Classification: H11, H50, H83 Keywords: Legislative Budget Institution, Legislative Budget Institution Index, AHP
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OECD performance budgeting framework Applying good budgeting practices to health A framework for working effectively across public agencies Financing and delivering early childhood education and childcare across levels of government Gender budgeting and intersectionality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1