Wisu Vorizato Harita, Wahyu Adi Mudiparwanto
{"title":"ANALISIS PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA PT. TELMARK INTEGRASI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA","authors":"Wisu Vorizato Harita, Wahyu Adi Mudiparwanto","doi":"10.26753/jlr.v2i1.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many companies use a Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT) system for their workers to streamline expenses. However, in practice, it is not uncommon to encounter violations that are not in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies that have been studied legally by secondary, tertiary, and analyzed by means of a qualitative approach. Based on the research results, the authors found a discrepancy between PT. Telmark Integration Indonesia in the implementation of PKWT in Article 81 number 14 and Article 81 number 15 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, namely a probationary period for workers. Furthermore, the authors found that PT. Telmark Integrasi Indonesia in providing legal protection has not all been implemented in accordance with the legislation Article 156 number 44 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation in which the company only gives workers rights starting from the remaining working period of the worker. Legal remedies that can be taken by workers are holding deliberations or called bipartite up to reporting to relevant agencies according to what is regulated in Article 3 on Law No. 2 of 2004 on Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes.","PeriodicalId":348532,"journal":{"name":"JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26753/jlr.v2i1.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很多企业为了节省开支,采用了“特定时间工作协议”(PKWT)制度。然而,在实践中,不符合2020年《创造就业机会法》第11号的违法行为屡见不鲜。本研究采用规范-实证方法,以文献研究的形式收集数据,这些文献研究已被二级、三级合法研究,并通过定性方法进行分析。根据研究结果,作者发现PT. Telmark Integration Indonesia在实施PKWT的第81条第14款和第81条第15款关于创造就业的2020年第11号法律(即工人试用期)之间存在差异。此外,作者还发现,印尼Telmark Integrasi PT公司在提供法律保护方面并未完全按照2020年第11号《创造就业机会法》第156条第44条的规定执行,该法律规定,公司仅从工人的剩余工作期限开始给予工人权利。根据2004年关于劳资关系纠纷解决的第2号法第3条的规定,工人可以采取的法律补救措施正在进行审议或被称为双方向有关机构报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA PT. TELMARK INTEGRASI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA
Many companies use a Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT) system for their workers to streamline expenses. However, in practice, it is not uncommon to encounter violations that are not in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies that have been studied legally by secondary, tertiary, and analyzed by means of a qualitative approach. Based on the research results, the authors found a discrepancy between PT. Telmark Integration Indonesia in the implementation of PKWT in Article 81 number 14 and Article 81 number 15 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, namely a probationary period for workers. Furthermore, the authors found that PT. Telmark Integrasi Indonesia in providing legal protection has not all been implemented in accordance with the legislation Article 156 number 44 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation in which the company only gives workers rights starting from the remaining working period of the worker. Legal remedies that can be taken by workers are holding deliberations or called bipartite up to reporting to relevant agencies according to what is regulated in Article 3 on Law No. 2 of 2004 on Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PERKEMBANGAN PELAKSANAAN PENERBITAN IZIN USAHA MELALUI SISTEM ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION (OSS) ANALISIS PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA PT. TELMARK INTEGRASI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA TAFSIR AYAT TENTANG SUMBER HUKUM ISLAM Akuntabilitas APBN Pasca Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Hukum Administrasi Negara Konsepsi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Pelaku Dan Korban Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1