建立和构建衡量知识管理成果的标准

V. Anantatmula, S. Kanungo
{"title":"建立和构建衡量知识管理成果的标准","authors":"V. Anantatmula, S. Kanungo","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2005.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing criteria for knowledge management is an imperative aspect of management as it helps determine results. Our research indicated that widely-accepted criteria and performance measures have not been developed for knowledge management. Our survey-based research, which used a questionnaire targeting knowledge management professionals as respondents, was aimed at establishing criteria for assessing knowledge management success. Using these criteria, a computer-assisted model is used to understand the shared underlying organizational framework in which KM operates and to identify how these criteria were linked. These relations should be explored and utilized to improve organizational performance. Future research should focus on translating the soft measures of knowledge management into detailed metrics.","PeriodicalId":355838,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"34 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing and Structuring Criteria for Measuring Knowledge Management Efforts\",\"authors\":\"V. Anantatmula, S. Kanungo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2005.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Establishing criteria for knowledge management is an imperative aspect of management as it helps determine results. Our research indicated that widely-accepted criteria and performance measures have not been developed for knowledge management. Our survey-based research, which used a questionnaire targeting knowledge management professionals as respondents, was aimed at establishing criteria for assessing knowledge management success. Using these criteria, a computer-assisted model is used to understand the shared underlying organizational framework in which KM operates and to identify how these criteria were linked. These relations should be explored and utilized to improve organizational performance. Future research should focus on translating the soft measures of knowledge management into detailed metrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

建立知识管理的标准是管理的一个必要方面,因为它有助于确定结果。我们的研究表明,广泛接受的标准和绩效措施尚未制定知识管理。我们以调查为基础的研究,使用了一份以知识管理专业人士为对象的问卷,旨在建立评估知识管理成功的标准。使用这些标准,计算机辅助模型被用来理解知识管理运作的共享的底层组织框架,并确定这些标准是如何联系在一起的。应该探索和利用这些关系来提高组织绩效。未来的研究应侧重于将知识管理的软度量转化为详细的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing and Structuring Criteria for Measuring Knowledge Management Efforts
Establishing criteria for knowledge management is an imperative aspect of management as it helps determine results. Our research indicated that widely-accepted criteria and performance measures have not been developed for knowledge management. Our survey-based research, which used a questionnaire targeting knowledge management professionals as respondents, was aimed at establishing criteria for assessing knowledge management success. Using these criteria, a computer-assisted model is used to understand the shared underlying organizational framework in which KM operates and to identify how these criteria were linked. These relations should be explored and utilized to improve organizational performance. Future research should focus on translating the soft measures of knowledge management into detailed metrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity: Is There More Than Meets The Eye? A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Technology Support on Teams with Differing Diversity A Framework for Evaluating Strategic Location-Based Applications in Businesses A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication: How Much Training is Enough? Prototyping the Emergence of Collaborative Knowledge Towards an Approach for Managing the Development Portfolio in Small Product-Oriented Software Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1