Patcharee Komjakraphan, K. Tsuruta, Tamayo Hasagawa, Toshihiko Yanagita, A. Hombu, Piyanuch Jitanoon, Karnsunaphat Balthip
{"title":"泰国与日本公共卫生护士工作生活质量调查比较","authors":"Patcharee Komjakraphan, K. Tsuruta, Tamayo Hasagawa, Toshihiko Yanagita, A. Hombu, Piyanuch Jitanoon, Karnsunaphat Balthip","doi":"10.48048/wjst.2020.4315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers from Thailand and Japan have initiated a collaborative project to compare the Quality of Work Life (QWL) among public health nurses. Thus, the QWL of registered nurses working in a community in Thailand was identified and compared with the Public Health Nurses (PHNs) in Japan. The purpose of which was to determine the similarities and differences between the two countries regarding their nurses’ quality of work life. The 42-item of Brooks’ survey of Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL) was translated and evaluated in Thailand and Japan. There were 102 Thai and 209 Japanese public health nurses completed the questionnaire. \nFindings showed that the QNWL level of both Thai and Japanese PHNs were at moderate level. Thai nurses scored higher than Japanese nurses in overall scores. Thai reported significantly higher on work design dimensions (t = 9.12, p < 0.05). For both groups, three out of four dimensions were ranked in the same pattern in which home life/work life was recorded as the lowest. This was followed by work design and work context. However, Thai scored lowest on work world dimension, while Japanese scored highest on that dimension. Findings also showed significant association between country and age groups (χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00, marital status (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01), education (χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00), and dependent family members (χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00). No significant association was noted between country and gender (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54), and between country and work experience (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23).The findings extended our understanding of the Public Health Nurse’s quality of work life that contributes to nursing in different cultural contexts through a rare direct comparison of Public Health Nurses between Thailand and Japan.","PeriodicalId":255195,"journal":{"name":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Work Life among Public Health Nurses: A Survey Comparison between Thailand and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Patcharee Komjakraphan, K. Tsuruta, Tamayo Hasagawa, Toshihiko Yanagita, A. Hombu, Piyanuch Jitanoon, Karnsunaphat Balthip\",\"doi\":\"10.48048/wjst.2020.4315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers from Thailand and Japan have initiated a collaborative project to compare the Quality of Work Life (QWL) among public health nurses. Thus, the QWL of registered nurses working in a community in Thailand was identified and compared with the Public Health Nurses (PHNs) in Japan. The purpose of which was to determine the similarities and differences between the two countries regarding their nurses’ quality of work life. The 42-item of Brooks’ survey of Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL) was translated and evaluated in Thailand and Japan. There were 102 Thai and 209 Japanese public health nurses completed the questionnaire. \\nFindings showed that the QNWL level of both Thai and Japanese PHNs were at moderate level. Thai nurses scored higher than Japanese nurses in overall scores. Thai reported significantly higher on work design dimensions (t = 9.12, p < 0.05). For both groups, three out of four dimensions were ranked in the same pattern in which home life/work life was recorded as the lowest. This was followed by work design and work context. However, Thai scored lowest on work world dimension, while Japanese scored highest on that dimension. Findings also showed significant association between country and age groups (χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00, marital status (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01), education (χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00), and dependent family members (χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00). No significant association was noted between country and gender (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54), and between country and work experience (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23).The findings extended our understanding of the Public Health Nurse’s quality of work life that contributes to nursing in different cultural contexts through a rare direct comparison of Public Health Nurses between Thailand and Japan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2020.4315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2020.4315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
来自泰国和日本的研究人员发起了一个合作项目,比较公共卫生护士的工作生活质量(QWL)。因此,我们确定了在泰国某社区工作的注册护士的QWL,并与日本的公共卫生护士(phn)进行了比较。其目的是确定两国护士工作生活质量的异同。布鲁克斯的护理工作生活质量调查(QNWL)的42个项目在泰国和日本进行了翻译和评估。共有102名泰国公共卫生护士和209名日本公共卫生护士完成问卷。结果显示,泰国和日本phn的QNWL水平均处于中等水平。泰国护士的总体得分高于日本护士。泰国在工作设计维度上的报告显著高于泰国(t = 9.12, p < 0.05)。对于这两组人来说,四个维度中有三个维度的排名模式相同,其中家庭生活/工作生活被记录为最低。其次是工作设计和工作环境。然而,泰国人在工作世界这一维度上得分最低,而日本人在这一维度上得分最高。国家和年龄(χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00)、婚姻状况(χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01)、受教育程度(χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00)、受抚养家庭成员(χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00)之间也存在显著相关性。国家和性别之间无显著相关性(χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54),国家和工作经验之间无显著相关性(χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23)。通过对泰国和日本的公共卫生护士进行罕见的直接比较,研究结果扩展了我们对不同文化背景下公共卫生护士工作生活质量的理解,这有助于护理。
Quality of Work Life among Public Health Nurses: A Survey Comparison between Thailand and Japan
Researchers from Thailand and Japan have initiated a collaborative project to compare the Quality of Work Life (QWL) among public health nurses. Thus, the QWL of registered nurses working in a community in Thailand was identified and compared with the Public Health Nurses (PHNs) in Japan. The purpose of which was to determine the similarities and differences between the two countries regarding their nurses’ quality of work life. The 42-item of Brooks’ survey of Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL) was translated and evaluated in Thailand and Japan. There were 102 Thai and 209 Japanese public health nurses completed the questionnaire.
Findings showed that the QNWL level of both Thai and Japanese PHNs were at moderate level. Thai nurses scored higher than Japanese nurses in overall scores. Thai reported significantly higher on work design dimensions (t = 9.12, p < 0.05). For both groups, three out of four dimensions were ranked in the same pattern in which home life/work life was recorded as the lowest. This was followed by work design and work context. However, Thai scored lowest on work world dimension, while Japanese scored highest on that dimension. Findings also showed significant association between country and age groups (χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00, marital status (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01), education (χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00), and dependent family members (χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00). No significant association was noted between country and gender (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54), and between country and work experience (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23).The findings extended our understanding of the Public Health Nurse’s quality of work life that contributes to nursing in different cultural contexts through a rare direct comparison of Public Health Nurses between Thailand and Japan.