Microsoft Academic、Google Scholar和ScienceDirect作为搜索引擎在学生获取图书馆资源中的比较

B. Wiyono, A. Valdez, J. Yunus
{"title":"Microsoft Academic、Google Scholar和ScienceDirect作为搜索引擎在学生获取图书馆资源中的比较","authors":"B. Wiyono, A. Valdez, J. Yunus","doi":"10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.","PeriodicalId":187876,"journal":{"name":"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of the Use of Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect as Search Engines in Obtaining Library Resources for Students\",\"authors\":\"B. Wiyono, A. Valdez, J. Yunus\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

获取图书馆资源是学生听课的主要任务。如果有完整的图书馆资源支持,学生的学习体验将得到最大限度的实现。信息通信技术迅猛发展的存在使得每个人都倾向于通过互联网来寻找信息。因此,搜索引擎是获取充足图书馆资源的一种简单方法。搜索引擎的类型很多,但哪些是有效的和高效的并没有深入研究。因此,有必要研究找到一个有效的搜索引擎。在本研究中,我们选取了学生使用最多的三种搜索引擎,分别是Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar和ScienceDirect。以134名博士生为研究样本。结果显示,学生们更多地使用Google Scholar来查找图书馆资源,其次是ScienceDirect和Microsoft Academic。通过这三种搜索引擎获得的信息在优点、缺点和可用性方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Comparison of the Use of Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect as Search Engines in Obtaining Library Resources for Students
Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Open-Source Bot: An Action Research Approach MOOCs in Foreign Language Learning: A Review of Development Strategies, Benefits, and User Perspectives MBCL (Metacognition Based Contextual Learning)-based e-Module Development for Elementary School Students Classification of News Articles for Learning Using the K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm Research Theme Map of Ubiquitous Learning: A 27-Years Overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1