{"title":"模拟布线质量的定量评价方法","authors":"P. B. Wu, R. Mack, R. Massara","doi":"10.1109/MWSCAS.2000.951416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A quantitative benchmarking metric is presented for the objective evaluation of the quality of analog layout. It facilitates comparisons between alternative design automation tools, and, for a given tool, provides the assessment of each layout instance. The quality metric reflects two principal concerns in layout design: area efficiency and net-routing optimality. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the metric in that the calculated scores provide a characterization that corresponds to expert designers' judgements.","PeriodicalId":437349,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat.No.CH37144)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative method for evaluating the quality of analog layout\",\"authors\":\"P. B. Wu, R. Mack, R. Massara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MWSCAS.2000.951416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A quantitative benchmarking metric is presented for the objective evaluation of the quality of analog layout. It facilitates comparisons between alternative design automation tools, and, for a given tool, provides the assessment of each layout instance. The quality metric reflects two principal concerns in layout design: area efficiency and net-routing optimality. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the metric in that the calculated scores provide a characterization that corresponds to expert designers' judgements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat.No.CH37144)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat.No.CH37144)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2000.951416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat.No.CH37144)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2000.951416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A quantitative method for evaluating the quality of analog layout
A quantitative benchmarking metric is presented for the objective evaluation of the quality of analog layout. It facilitates comparisons between alternative design automation tools, and, for a given tool, provides the assessment of each layout instance. The quality metric reflects two principal concerns in layout design: area efficiency and net-routing optimality. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the metric in that the calculated scores provide a characterization that corresponds to expert designers' judgements.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
