{"title":"İSNEVÎ’NİN USÛL DÜŞÜNCESİNDE EMİR VE NEHİY","authors":"Laith Motei Yahia Alazab, Recep Cici","doi":"10.20486/imad.774984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of command (emir) and prohibition (nehiy) is evaluated as one of the most important topics of usūl al-fiqh. Due to their modals, especially the meanings of command and prohibition involve many controversial issues among usūl al-fiqh scholars, particularly the matter of whether the requirement (mūjab) and command express repetition. In this regard, whether the command requires impulsiveness (fawr) or abstaining (terahi), whether a command of action/practice indicates respect or permission after being prohibited, and similarly whether the parts of command requires impulsiveness or abstaining are also among these matters in dispute. Therefore, scholars attach great importance to this subject in their works. Shāfiʿī scholar Abdurrahīm ibn al-Hasan al-Kurashī al-Isnavî, who lived in the eighth century AH/fourteenth century CE, is one of the aforementioned usūl al-fiqh scholars. This study aims to make a contribution to the literature of usūl al-fiqh in accordance with Kalami school by illuminating Isnavī’s methodology on this matter and his opinions on usūl due to the significance of this matter in usūl al-fiqh and presenting how he evaluated, the views of Shāfiʿīs in particular, along with Hanafī, Malikī scholars and other faqihs, and in what way he choosed among these views and","PeriodicalId":177047,"journal":{"name":"İslam Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İslam Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20486/imad.774984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
命令(emir)和禁止(nehiy)的主题被评价为usūl al-fiqh最重要的主题之一。由于它们的情态,特别是命令和禁止的含义,在usūl伊斯兰学者中涉及到许多有争议的问题,特别是要求(mūjab)和命令是否表达重复的问题。在这方面,命令是否需要冲动(fawr)或弃权(terahi),行动/实践的命令在被禁止后是否表示尊重或许可,同样,命令的部分是否需要冲动或弃权也是这些争议的问题之一。因此,学者们在其著作中对这一主题十分重视。Shāfi学者abdurrah m ibn al-Hasan al- kurashyi al-Isnavî,生活在公元8世纪/公元14世纪,是上述usūl al-fiqh学者之一。本研究旨在根据卡拉米学派对usūl al-fiqh的文献做出贡献,通过阐明isnavi在这个问题上的方法和他对usūl的看法(因为这个问题在usūl al-fiqh中具有重要意义),并介绍他如何评估,特别是Shāfi al- 的观点,以及哈纳夫派、马里克派学者和其他法奇派的观点,以及他如何选择这些观点和方法
The subject of command (emir) and prohibition (nehiy) is evaluated as one of the most important topics of usūl al-fiqh. Due to their modals, especially the meanings of command and prohibition involve many controversial issues among usūl al-fiqh scholars, particularly the matter of whether the requirement (mūjab) and command express repetition. In this regard, whether the command requires impulsiveness (fawr) or abstaining (terahi), whether a command of action/practice indicates respect or permission after being prohibited, and similarly whether the parts of command requires impulsiveness or abstaining are also among these matters in dispute. Therefore, scholars attach great importance to this subject in their works. Shāfiʿī scholar Abdurrahīm ibn al-Hasan al-Kurashī al-Isnavî, who lived in the eighth century AH/fourteenth century CE, is one of the aforementioned usūl al-fiqh scholars. This study aims to make a contribution to the literature of usūl al-fiqh in accordance with Kalami school by illuminating Isnavī’s methodology on this matter and his opinions on usūl due to the significance of this matter in usūl al-fiqh and presenting how he evaluated, the views of Shāfiʿīs in particular, along with Hanafī, Malikī scholars and other faqihs, and in what way he choosed among these views and