三方向关节囊拉伸对肩周炎患者角关节活动的疗效:一项随机对照试验

Rabia Noureen, Hajra Ameer Shaikh, M. Amir, Nida Waheed, S. Nawaz
{"title":"三方向关节囊拉伸对肩周炎患者角关节活动的疗效:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Rabia Noureen, Hajra Ameer Shaikh, M. Amir, Nida Waheed, S. Nawaz","doi":"10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The evidence regarding efficacy of the new concept of Angular Joint Mobilization technique(AJM) is scare hence this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of AJM versus three dimensionalCapsular Stretching exercises (CS) in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations, shoulder disability andin improving ROM of FS survivors.Methodology: A randomized controlled, parallel group design study was conducted on FS patients.Participants with the history of FS and aged 35 to 60 years were included however subjects with glenohumeralarthritis, trauma, infection or congenital abnormality of shoulder were excluded. Four outcome measureswere assessed including Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Pain andDisability Index (SPADI) and goniometer. 50 volunteers were equally divided into AJM and CS group.Result: The mean comparison of post NPRS in AJM group was 3.4 and in CS group was 4.4, SST score inAJM was 10.4 and CS was 9.4, SPDAI and ROM in all the direction showed significant improvement inAJM as compared to CS group at p-value <0.05.Conclusion: AJM is significantly more effective in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations andshoulder disability, also in improving ROM of FS patients as compared to CS.","PeriodicalId":243536,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Three Directional Capsular Stretching Versus Angular Joint Mobilization in Patients with Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Rabia Noureen, Hajra Ameer Shaikh, M. Amir, Nida Waheed, S. Nawaz\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The evidence regarding efficacy of the new concept of Angular Joint Mobilization technique(AJM) is scare hence this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of AJM versus three dimensionalCapsular Stretching exercises (CS) in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations, shoulder disability andin improving ROM of FS survivors.Methodology: A randomized controlled, parallel group design study was conducted on FS patients.Participants with the history of FS and aged 35 to 60 years were included however subjects with glenohumeralarthritis, trauma, infection or congenital abnormality of shoulder were excluded. Four outcome measureswere assessed including Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Pain andDisability Index (SPADI) and goniometer. 50 volunteers were equally divided into AJM and CS group.Result: The mean comparison of post NPRS in AJM group was 3.4 and in CS group was 4.4, SST score inAJM was 10.4 and CS was 9.4, SPDAI and ROM in all the direction showed significant improvement inAJM as compared to CS group at p-value <0.05.Conclusion: AJM is significantly more effective in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations andshoulder disability, also in improving ROM of FS patients as compared to CS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于角关节活动技术(AJM)新概念有效性的证据很少,因此本研究旨在比较AJM与三维关节囊拉伸练习(CS)在减轻FS幸存者肩关节疼痛、功能限制、肩关节残疾和改善ROM方面的有效性。方法:对FS患者进行随机对照、平行组设计研究。年龄在35 - 60岁之间有FS病史的受试者被纳入研究,但肩关节关节炎、外伤、感染或先天性肩关节异常的受试者被排除在外。评估了四项结果测量,包括数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、简单肩部测试(SST)、肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和关节计。50名志愿者平均分为AJM组和CS组。结果:AJM组NPRS后评分平均为3.4分,CS组平均为4.4分;AJM组SST评分为10.4分,CS组为9.4分;AJM组各方向SPDAI、ROM较CS组均有显著改善,p值<0.05。结论:与CS相比,AJM在减轻FS患者的肩部疼痛、功能限制和肩部残疾以及改善ROM方面明显更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Three Directional Capsular Stretching Versus Angular Joint Mobilization in Patients with Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: The evidence regarding efficacy of the new concept of Angular Joint Mobilization technique(AJM) is scare hence this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of AJM versus three dimensionalCapsular Stretching exercises (CS) in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations, shoulder disability andin improving ROM of FS survivors.Methodology: A randomized controlled, parallel group design study was conducted on FS patients.Participants with the history of FS and aged 35 to 60 years were included however subjects with glenohumeralarthritis, trauma, infection or congenital abnormality of shoulder were excluded. Four outcome measureswere assessed including Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Pain andDisability Index (SPADI) and goniometer. 50 volunteers were equally divided into AJM and CS group.Result: The mean comparison of post NPRS in AJM group was 3.4 and in CS group was 4.4, SST score inAJM was 10.4 and CS was 9.4, SPDAI and ROM in all the direction showed significant improvement inAJM as compared to CS group at p-value <0.05.Conclusion: AJM is significantly more effective in reducing shoulder pain, functional limitations andshoulder disability, also in improving ROM of FS patients as compared to CS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Music Therapy and Frenkel Exercise on Reaction Time in Geriatric Population-A Comparative Study Correlation between Postural Stabilty and Functional Disabilty in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Effect of Tilt Table Training on Balance among Subjects with Basal Ganglia Bleed: A Pilot Study Association between Balance Confidence and Cognitive-Motor Interference in Stroke Patients – Pilot Study A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) of Wavelength 905 NM and 808 NM in Management of Chronic Low Back Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1