超声探头清洁、消毒和灭菌使用说明书的可用性试验

Marianna Oliverio, Daniele Fiesoli, Simona Bellavia, R. De Luca
{"title":"超声探头清洁、消毒和灭菌使用说明书的可用性试验","authors":"Marianna Oliverio, Daniele Fiesoli, Simona Bellavia, R. De Luca","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) represents an area of big\n interest in healthcare. In this context, 'reprocessing' means a cleaning,\n disinfection or sterilisation process carried out on a used device in order\n to allow its safe reuse. A typical IPC responsibility assignments matrix\n includes healthcare facilities, manufacturers of reprocessing agents and\n equipment, and manufacturers of medical devices. This project aims to\n analyze and validate the Instructions for Use (IFUs) for reprocessing of\n ultrasound (US) probes, from the point of view of the usability, in\n accordance with IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 and IEC TR 62366-2:2016.US probes\n enable a wide range of applications, with the level of infection risk based\n on the Spaulding Classification, going from noncritical and semi-critical\n (intact skin and mucous membrane contacts respectively), to critical\n (intraoperative). In addition to the diverse clinical procedures, the risk\n of contamination depends also on the variability in the healthcare\n environment and user knowledge and expertise.Safe reprocessing of an US\n probe requires that its IFUs, considered as part of the user interface, are\n clear, legible, and complete. For this reason, to ensure their correct\n execution and workflow, a usability testing for the reprocessing IFUs is\n performed. According to the IEC 62366 standards, such test consists of two\n steps: formative and summative evaluations. The overall aim of the first\n step is to explore if the instructions are recognizable, understandable and\n operable by the user and to identify worst-case scenarios and critical tasks\n which will be further investigated during the second step by a user group,\n including lay and professional users with different profiles and needs. For\n the purpose of this project, the usability testing has confirmed a powerful\n tool to verify that our reprocessing IFUs for aUS probe can be easily and\n effectively used. The preliminary analysis and the following interviews of\n diverse users operating in different environments, have provided evidence\n that such IFUs enable the user to perform a proper and reliable reprocessing\n for a safe reuse of the probe.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability testing of instructions for use in cleaning, disinfection and\\n sterilization of ultrasound probes\",\"authors\":\"Marianna Oliverio, Daniele Fiesoli, Simona Bellavia, R. De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1004149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) represents an area of big\\n interest in healthcare. In this context, 'reprocessing' means a cleaning,\\n disinfection or sterilisation process carried out on a used device in order\\n to allow its safe reuse. A typical IPC responsibility assignments matrix\\n includes healthcare facilities, manufacturers of reprocessing agents and\\n equipment, and manufacturers of medical devices. This project aims to\\n analyze and validate the Instructions for Use (IFUs) for reprocessing of\\n ultrasound (US) probes, from the point of view of the usability, in\\n accordance with IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 and IEC TR 62366-2:2016.US probes\\n enable a wide range of applications, with the level of infection risk based\\n on the Spaulding Classification, going from noncritical and semi-critical\\n (intact skin and mucous membrane contacts respectively), to critical\\n (intraoperative). In addition to the diverse clinical procedures, the risk\\n of contamination depends also on the variability in the healthcare\\n environment and user knowledge and expertise.Safe reprocessing of an US\\n probe requires that its IFUs, considered as part of the user interface, are\\n clear, legible, and complete. For this reason, to ensure their correct\\n execution and workflow, a usability testing for the reprocessing IFUs is\\n performed. According to the IEC 62366 standards, such test consists of two\\n steps: formative and summative evaluations. The overall aim of the first\\n step is to explore if the instructions are recognizable, understandable and\\n operable by the user and to identify worst-case scenarios and critical tasks\\n which will be further investigated during the second step by a user group,\\n including lay and professional users with different profiles and needs. For\\n the purpose of this project, the usability testing has confirmed a powerful\\n tool to verify that our reprocessing IFUs for aUS probe can be easily and\\n effectively used. The preliminary analysis and the following interviews of\\n diverse users operating in different environments, have provided evidence\\n that such IFUs enable the user to perform a proper and reliable reprocessing\\n for a safe reuse of the probe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\\n and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\\n and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染预防和控制(IPC)是医疗保健领域的一个重要领域。在这种情况下,“再处理”是指在使用过的器械上进行的清洁、消毒或灭菌过程,以允许其安全重复使用。典型的IPC责任分配矩阵包括医疗机构、后处理剂和设备制造商以及医疗器械制造商。本项目旨在根据IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020和IEC TR 62366-2:2016,从可用性的角度分析和验证超声(US)探头再处理的使用说明书(ifu)。US探针具有广泛的应用范围,其感染风险等级基于Spaulding分类,从非关键和半关键(分别为完整的皮肤和粘膜接触)到关键(术中)。除了不同的临床程序外,污染的风险还取决于医疗环境的可变性以及用户的知识和专业知识。美国探针的安全再处理要求其ifu(作为用户界面的一部分)清晰、易读和完整。出于这个原因,为了确保它们的正确执行和工作流程,需要对再处理ifu进行可用性测试。根据IEC 62366标准,这种测试包括两个步骤:形成性评估和总结性评估。第一步的总体目标是探索用户是否可以识别、理解和操作指令,并确定最坏情况和关键任务,这些将在第二步由用户组(包括具有不同概况和需求的外行和专业用户)进一步调查。为了这个项目的目的,可用性测试已经确认了一个强大的工具,以验证我们的后处理ifu为aUS探针可以轻松有效地使用。初步分析和随后对在不同环境中操作的不同用户进行的访谈提供了证据,表明这种ifu使用户能够进行适当和可靠的再处理,以安全重复使用探针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability testing of instructions for use in cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of ultrasound probes
Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) represents an area of big interest in healthcare. In this context, 'reprocessing' means a cleaning, disinfection or sterilisation process carried out on a used device in order to allow its safe reuse. A typical IPC responsibility assignments matrix includes healthcare facilities, manufacturers of reprocessing agents and equipment, and manufacturers of medical devices. This project aims to analyze and validate the Instructions for Use (IFUs) for reprocessing of ultrasound (US) probes, from the point of view of the usability, in accordance with IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 and IEC TR 62366-2:2016.US probes enable a wide range of applications, with the level of infection risk based on the Spaulding Classification, going from noncritical and semi-critical (intact skin and mucous membrane contacts respectively), to critical (intraoperative). In addition to the diverse clinical procedures, the risk of contamination depends also on the variability in the healthcare environment and user knowledge and expertise.Safe reprocessing of an US probe requires that its IFUs, considered as part of the user interface, are clear, legible, and complete. For this reason, to ensure their correct execution and workflow, a usability testing for the reprocessing IFUs is performed. According to the IEC 62366 standards, such test consists of two steps: formative and summative evaluations. The overall aim of the first step is to explore if the instructions are recognizable, understandable and operable by the user and to identify worst-case scenarios and critical tasks which will be further investigated during the second step by a user group, including lay and professional users with different profiles and needs. For the purpose of this project, the usability testing has confirmed a powerful tool to verify that our reprocessing IFUs for aUS probe can be easily and effectively used. The preliminary analysis and the following interviews of diverse users operating in different environments, have provided evidence that such IFUs enable the user to perform a proper and reliable reprocessing for a safe reuse of the probe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What To Do When The Requirements Are Unknown? - Development of a Simulator for Excretory Care The effect of operation steps on the efficiency of human-computer interaction DJaytopia: a hybrid intelligent DJ co-remixing system Human-Centered Design for a Virtual Human led mHealth Intervention for Suicide Prevention OSH risks of health and social care workers working in clients' homes in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1