对g.h.a Juynboll《圣训》研究方法论的批判研究

Alam Khan
{"title":"对g.h.a Juynboll《圣训》研究方法论的批判研究","authors":"Alam Khan","doi":"10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes methodology of an Orientalist, G. H. A Juynboll in Hadīth. He is one of those western scholars who has focused on the second primary source of Islamic Law and has developed skeptical theories related to its authenticity and provenance. He relied on early scholars' theories in this discipline and supported their thesis with a bulk of arguments from the early Classical Islamic Sources. A follow-up of his methodology reveals some scientific methodological errors in his studies on Hadīth that led him to a false conclusion. This study discusses the loopholes in his methodology and supports every point with illustrative examples from his works, revealing that Juynboll followed a selective method in his studies and reached his desired/concocted conclusion.","PeriodicalId":159824,"journal":{"name":"Al-Idah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Study of G. H. A Juynboll's Methodology in the Study of Hadith\",\"authors\":\"Alam Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes methodology of an Orientalist, G. H. A Juynboll in Hadīth. He is one of those western scholars who has focused on the second primary source of Islamic Law and has developed skeptical theories related to its authenticity and provenance. He relied on early scholars' theories in this discipline and supported their thesis with a bulk of arguments from the early Classical Islamic Sources. A follow-up of his methodology reveals some scientific methodological errors in his studies on Hadīth that led him to a false conclusion. This study discusses the loopholes in his methodology and supports every point with illustrative examples from his works, revealing that Juynboll followed a selective method in his studies and reached his desired/concocted conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Idah\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Idah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Idah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了东方学家g.h.a Juynboll的方法论。他是关注伊斯兰教法第二主要来源的西方学者之一,并对其真实性和来源提出了怀疑理论。他借鉴了早期学者在这一学科中的理论,并用早期古典伊斯兰材料中的大量论点来支持他们的论点。对他的方法论的后续研究表明,他在对哈德哈德的研究中存在一些科学方法上的错误,导致他得出了一个错误的结论。本研究讨论了他的方法论中的漏洞,并从他的作品中举例支持每一个观点,揭示了Juynboll在他的研究中遵循了一种选择性的方法,并得出了他想要的/捏造的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Study of G. H. A Juynboll's Methodology in the Study of Hadith
This article analyzes methodology of an Orientalist, G. H. A Juynboll in Hadīth. He is one of those western scholars who has focused on the second primary source of Islamic Law and has developed skeptical theories related to its authenticity and provenance. He relied on early scholars' theories in this discipline and supported their thesis with a bulk of arguments from the early Classical Islamic Sources. A follow-up of his methodology reveals some scientific methodological errors in his studies on Hadīth that led him to a false conclusion. This study discusses the loopholes in his methodology and supports every point with illustrative examples from his works, revealing that Juynboll followed a selective method in his studies and reached his desired/concocted conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Academic Curriculum of Universities and Madrasas in perspective of Islam and modern era A research analysis on the Challenges of Media in the field of Da’wah A Comparative Study on Educational Ethics: Insights from Islamic Educational Philosophy and Western Literature Exploring the Global Impact of Homosexuality: A Comprehensive Analysis from Islamic Perspective الأساليب التربوية للوقاية من الفساد الأخلاقي في الإسلام.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1