2004-2016年美国州和地方住房政策对县级租金和驱逐的影响

Ashley C Bradford, W. Bradford
{"title":"2004-2016年美国州和地方住房政策对县级租金和驱逐的影响","authors":"Ashley C Bradford, W. Bradford","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3623318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Housing instability is a constant fact of life for many people in the United States – a fact which is made more urgent and salient during periods of economic disruption such as that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. A relatively new line of research has illuminated the degree to which housing instability, in the form of eviction, is a substantial contributor to health risks, such as “deaths of despair” from alcohol or drug-related accidental poisonings. While eviction is a persistent threat in the U.S., there is almost no research available to guide decision makers about which policies are more or less effective at lowering eviction rates. We provide a theoretical framework of the eviction process highlighting the role that policy might be expected to play in determining local eviction rates. We test this theory using data on evictions for nearly all U.S. counties from 2004-2016 with a panel of state-level landlord-tenant laws and a panel of local housing-specific investments by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. We find strong agreement between the theoretical predictions and empirical net effects for nearly all policies studied, and discuss how states and localities may better use combinations of policies to achieving lower eviction rates.","PeriodicalId":132360,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of State and Local Housing Policies on County-Level Rent and Evictions in the United States, 2004-2016\",\"authors\":\"Ashley C Bradford, W. Bradford\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3623318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Housing instability is a constant fact of life for many people in the United States – a fact which is made more urgent and salient during periods of economic disruption such as that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. A relatively new line of research has illuminated the degree to which housing instability, in the form of eviction, is a substantial contributor to health risks, such as “deaths of despair” from alcohol or drug-related accidental poisonings. While eviction is a persistent threat in the U.S., there is almost no research available to guide decision makers about which policies are more or less effective at lowering eviction rates. We provide a theoretical framework of the eviction process highlighting the role that policy might be expected to play in determining local eviction rates. We test this theory using data on evictions for nearly all U.S. counties from 2004-2016 with a panel of state-level landlord-tenant laws and a panel of local housing-specific investments by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. We find strong agreement between the theoretical predictions and empirical net effects for nearly all policies studied, and discuss how states and localities may better use combinations of policies to achieving lower eviction rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Political Economy: National\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Political Economy: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

住房不稳定是许多美国人生活中一个持续存在的事实,在2020年COVID-19大流行等经济动荡时期,这一事实变得更加紧迫和突出。一项相对较新的研究表明,以驱逐为形式的住房不稳定在很大程度上造成了健康风险,例如因酒精或与毒品有关的意外中毒而"绝望死亡"。虽然驱逐在美国是一个持续存在的威胁,但几乎没有研究可以指导决策者了解哪些政策在降低驱逐率方面或多或少有效。我们提供了一个驱逐过程的理论框架,强调了政策在决定当地驱逐率方面可能发挥的作用。我们使用2004-2016年美国几乎所有县的驱逐数据来检验这一理论,其中包括一个州级房东-租户法律小组和一个住房和城市发展部(Department of Housing and Urban Development)的地方住房特定投资小组。我们发现几乎所有研究政策的理论预测和实证净效应之间存在强烈的一致性,并讨论了州和地方如何更好地使用政策组合来实现更低的驱逐率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of State and Local Housing Policies on County-Level Rent and Evictions in the United States, 2004-2016
Housing instability is a constant fact of life for many people in the United States – a fact which is made more urgent and salient during periods of economic disruption such as that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. A relatively new line of research has illuminated the degree to which housing instability, in the form of eviction, is a substantial contributor to health risks, such as “deaths of despair” from alcohol or drug-related accidental poisonings. While eviction is a persistent threat in the U.S., there is almost no research available to guide decision makers about which policies are more or less effective at lowering eviction rates. We provide a theoretical framework of the eviction process highlighting the role that policy might be expected to play in determining local eviction rates. We test this theory using data on evictions for nearly all U.S. counties from 2004-2016 with a panel of state-level landlord-tenant laws and a panel of local housing-specific investments by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. We find strong agreement between the theoretical predictions and empirical net effects for nearly all policies studied, and discuss how states and localities may better use combinations of policies to achieving lower eviction rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the Stick Make the Carrot More Attractive? State Mandates and Uptake of Renewable Heating Technologies Strategic Inefficient Decentralization: Local and Regional Devolution as Substitutes The COVID-19 Pandemic and Small Business in Illinois: A Preliminary Comparison of Neighboring States The Blemish of Voter Apathy in Sustaining Democratic Governance in Nigeria: The Role of Political Parties How Local Leadership Rotation Breaks State-Business Ties in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1