影像引导手术介入的光学追踪器评估

M. Naheem, Andal Amirthavarshini G, S. A, P. Dumpuri, Manojkumar Lakshmanan, M. Sivaprakasam
{"title":"影像引导手术介入的光学追踪器评估","authors":"M. Naheem, Andal Amirthavarshini G, S. A, P. Dumpuri, Manojkumar Lakshmanan, M. Sivaprakasam","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical tracking systems are extensively used in minimally invasive image-guided surgeries. The efficiency of such a system depends on the precise tracking of surgical tools. The optimal setup of the navigation system and calibration of the tool are the predominant factors that affect the tracking accuracy. We have developed and implemented customized filtering and calibration algorithms on a cost-effective camera, the fusionTrack 500 manufactured by Atracsys. Deployment of these in-house algorithms and protocols have shown a significant increase in the tracking accuracy. Extensive validations were conducted on fusionTrack 500 and benchmarked against NDI Polaris Vega, an industrial standard camera. ASTM phantom was used to validate the tracking accuracy of the navigation system. A Deldrin-based phantom was designed particularly to evaluate the Target Registration Error. Further, a volumetric study was carried out to assess the relative position error between cameras, using a 3D FARO arm CMM. The proposed calibration method implemented on the Atracsys camera shows a 33.7% improvement in the tracking accuracy compared to its native algorithm. Target Registration Error for NDI camera was observed to be 1.2 mm and Atracsys was 0.8 mm, which depicts a 0.4 mm enhancement. Incorporating these algorithms would allow us to effectively integrate cost-effective optical tracking systems into image-guided navigation systems.","PeriodicalId":106228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical Tracker Assessment for Image Guided Surgical Interventions\",\"authors\":\"M. Naheem, Andal Amirthavarshini G, S. A, P. Dumpuri, Manojkumar Lakshmanan, M. Sivaprakasam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optical tracking systems are extensively used in minimally invasive image-guided surgeries. The efficiency of such a system depends on the precise tracking of surgical tools. The optimal setup of the navigation system and calibration of the tool are the predominant factors that affect the tracking accuracy. We have developed and implemented customized filtering and calibration algorithms on a cost-effective camera, the fusionTrack 500 manufactured by Atracsys. Deployment of these in-house algorithms and protocols have shown a significant increase in the tracking accuracy. Extensive validations were conducted on fusionTrack 500 and benchmarked against NDI Polaris Vega, an industrial standard camera. ASTM phantom was used to validate the tracking accuracy of the navigation system. A Deldrin-based phantom was designed particularly to evaluate the Target Registration Error. Further, a volumetric study was carried out to assess the relative position error between cameras, using a 3D FARO arm CMM. The proposed calibration method implemented on the Atracsys camera shows a 33.7% improvement in the tracking accuracy compared to its native algorithm. Target Registration Error for NDI camera was observed to be 1.2 mm and Atracsys was 0.8 mm, which depicts a 0.4 mm enhancement. Incorporating these algorithms would allow us to effectively integrate cost-effective optical tracking systems into image-guided navigation systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

光学跟踪系统广泛应用于微创图像引导手术。这种系统的效率取决于手术工具的精确跟踪。导航系统的优化设置和刀具的标定是影响跟踪精度的主要因素。我们已经开发并实施了定制滤波和校准算法在一个具有成本效益的相机,fusionTrack 500由Atracsys制造。这些内部算法和协议的部署显示出跟踪精度的显着提高。在fusionTrack 500上进行了广泛的验证,并与NDI Polaris Vega(一款工业标准相机)进行了基准测试。采用ASTM模型验证导航系统的跟踪精度。设计了一个基于deldrin的模型来评估目标定位误差。此外,使用3D FARO臂式三坐标测量机进行了体积研究,以评估相机之间的相对位置误差。本文提出的标定方法在Atracsys相机上实现,与原有算法相比,标定精度提高了33.7%。NDI相机的目标配准误差为1.2 mm, Atracsys为0.8 mm,增强了0.4 mm。结合这些算法将使我们能够有效地将具有成本效益的光学跟踪系统集成到图像制导导航系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optical Tracker Assessment for Image Guided Surgical Interventions
Optical tracking systems are extensively used in minimally invasive image-guided surgeries. The efficiency of such a system depends on the precise tracking of surgical tools. The optimal setup of the navigation system and calibration of the tool are the predominant factors that affect the tracking accuracy. We have developed and implemented customized filtering and calibration algorithms on a cost-effective camera, the fusionTrack 500 manufactured by Atracsys. Deployment of these in-house algorithms and protocols have shown a significant increase in the tracking accuracy. Extensive validations were conducted on fusionTrack 500 and benchmarked against NDI Polaris Vega, an industrial standard camera. ASTM phantom was used to validate the tracking accuracy of the navigation system. A Deldrin-based phantom was designed particularly to evaluate the Target Registration Error. Further, a volumetric study was carried out to assess the relative position error between cameras, using a 3D FARO arm CMM. The proposed calibration method implemented on the Atracsys camera shows a 33.7% improvement in the tracking accuracy compared to its native algorithm. Target Registration Error for NDI camera was observed to be 1.2 mm and Atracsys was 0.8 mm, which depicts a 0.4 mm enhancement. Incorporating these algorithms would allow us to effectively integrate cost-effective optical tracking systems into image-guided navigation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time and Frequency domain analysis of APB muscles Abduction in adult dominant hand using surface electromyography signals Comparison of Noise Reduction Techniques for Dysarthric Speech Recognition Effects of ROI positioning on the measurement of engineered muscle tissue contractility with an optical tracking method Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Means of Edge Computing on Wearable Device: A Feasibility Assessment Unraveling the biological meaning of radiomic features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1