利用中间地球静止参考传感器在极轨道上交叉校准海洋颜色传感器的可行性

Jing Tan, R. Frouin, H. Murakami
{"title":"利用中间地球静止参考传感器在极轨道上交叉校准海洋颜色传感器的可行性","authors":"Jing Tan, R. Frouin, H. Murakami","doi":"10.3389/frsen.2023.1072930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A generic methodology is presented to cross-calibrate satellite ocean-color sensors in polar orbit via an intermediary geostationary sensor of reference. In this study, AHI onboard Hiwamari-8 is used as the intermediary sensor to cross-calibrate SGLI onboard GCOM-C and MODIS onboard Aqua and Terra (MODIS-A and MODIS-T) after system vicarious calibration (SVC). Numerous coincidences were obtained near the Equator using 3 days of imagery, i.e., 11 May 2018, 22 January 2019, and 25 January 2020. Spectral matching to AHI spectral bands was first performed for a wide range of angular geometry, aerosol conditions, and Case 1 waters using a single band or multiple bands of SGLI, MODIS-A and MODIS-T, yielding root mean square differences of 0.1–0.7% in the blue and green and 0.7%–3.7% in the red depending on the band combination. Limited by the inherent AHI instrument noise and the system vicarious calibration of individual polar-orbiting sensors, cross-calibration was only performed for equivalent AHI bands centered on at 471, 510, and 639 nm. Results show that MODIS-A and MODIS-T are accurately cross-calibrated, with cross-calibration ratios differing by 0.1%–0.8% in magnitude. These differences are within or slightly outside the estimated uncertainties of ±0.6% to ±1.0%. In contrast, SGLI shows larger cross-calibration differences, i.e., 1.4%, 3.4%, and 1.1% with MODIS-A and 1.5%, 4.6%, and 1.5% with MODIS-T, respectively. These differences are above uncertainties of ±0.8–1.0% at 471 and 510 nm and within uncertainties of ±2.3% and ±1.9% at 639 nm. Such differences may introduce significant discrepancies between ocean-color products generated from SGLI and MODIS data, although some compensation may occur because different atmospheric correction schemes are used to process SGLI and MODIS imagery, and SVC is based on the selected scheme. Geostationary sensors with ocean color capability have potential to improve the spectral matching and reduce uncertainties, as long as they provide imagery at sufficient cadence over equatorial regions. The methodology is applicable to polar-orbiting optical sensors in general and can be implemented operationally to ensure consistency of products generated by individual sensors in establishing long-term data records for climate studies.","PeriodicalId":198378,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of cross-calibrating ocean-color sensors in polar orbit using an intermediary geostationary sensor of reference\",\"authors\":\"Jing Tan, R. Frouin, H. Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frsen.2023.1072930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A generic methodology is presented to cross-calibrate satellite ocean-color sensors in polar orbit via an intermediary geostationary sensor of reference. In this study, AHI onboard Hiwamari-8 is used as the intermediary sensor to cross-calibrate SGLI onboard GCOM-C and MODIS onboard Aqua and Terra (MODIS-A and MODIS-T) after system vicarious calibration (SVC). Numerous coincidences were obtained near the Equator using 3 days of imagery, i.e., 11 May 2018, 22 January 2019, and 25 January 2020. Spectral matching to AHI spectral bands was first performed for a wide range of angular geometry, aerosol conditions, and Case 1 waters using a single band or multiple bands of SGLI, MODIS-A and MODIS-T, yielding root mean square differences of 0.1–0.7% in the blue and green and 0.7%–3.7% in the red depending on the band combination. Limited by the inherent AHI instrument noise and the system vicarious calibration of individual polar-orbiting sensors, cross-calibration was only performed for equivalent AHI bands centered on at 471, 510, and 639 nm. Results show that MODIS-A and MODIS-T are accurately cross-calibrated, with cross-calibration ratios differing by 0.1%–0.8% in magnitude. These differences are within or slightly outside the estimated uncertainties of ±0.6% to ±1.0%. In contrast, SGLI shows larger cross-calibration differences, i.e., 1.4%, 3.4%, and 1.1% with MODIS-A and 1.5%, 4.6%, and 1.5% with MODIS-T, respectively. These differences are above uncertainties of ±0.8–1.0% at 471 and 510 nm and within uncertainties of ±2.3% and ±1.9% at 639 nm. Such differences may introduce significant discrepancies between ocean-color products generated from SGLI and MODIS data, although some compensation may occur because different atmospheric correction schemes are used to process SGLI and MODIS imagery, and SVC is based on the selected scheme. Geostationary sensors with ocean color capability have potential to improve the spectral matching and reduce uncertainties, as long as they provide imagery at sufficient cadence over equatorial regions. The methodology is applicable to polar-orbiting optical sensors in general and can be implemented operationally to ensure consistency of products generated by individual sensors in establishing long-term data records for climate studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1072930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1072930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种通过中间参考地球静止传感器交叉校准极地轨道卫星海洋颜色传感器的通用方法。本研究利用Hiwamari-8机载AHI作为中间传感器,在系统替代校准(SVC)后,对GCOM-C机载SGLI和Aqua和Terra机载MODIS (MODIS- a和MODIS- t)进行交叉校准。使用3天的图像,即2018年5月11日、2019年1月22日和2020年1月25日,在赤道附近获得了许多巧合。首先使用SGLI、MODIS-A和MODIS-T的单波段或多波段对大范围的角度几何形状、气溶胶条件和Case 1水域进行了与AHI光谱波段的光谱匹配,根据波段组合的不同,蓝色和绿色的均方根差为0.1-0.7%,红色的均方根差为0.7%-3.7%。受固有的AHI仪器噪声和单个极轨传感器的系统替代校准的限制,仅对以471,510和639 nm为中心的等效AHI波段进行交叉校准。结果表明,MODIS-A和MODIS-T的交叉校准精度较高,交叉校准比例相差0.1% ~ 0.8%。这些差异在±0.6%至±1.0%的估计不确定度之内或略外。相比之下,SGLI与MODIS-A的交叉校准差异较大,分别为1.4%、3.4%和1.1%,与MODIS-T的交叉校准差异分别为1.5%、4.6%和1.5%。这些差异在471和510 nm处的不确定度为±0.8-1.0%,在639 nm处的不确定度为±2.3%和±1.9%。这种差异可能会导致SGLI和MODIS数据生成的海洋色产品之间存在显著差异,尽管由于使用不同的大气校正方案处理SGLI和MODIS图像,并且SVC基于所选方案,可能会产生一些补偿。具有海洋颜色能力的地球同步传感器有潜力改善光谱匹配并减少不确定性,只要它们在赤道地区以足够的节奏提供图像。该方法一般适用于极轨光学传感器,并可在业务上实施,以确保在为气候研究建立长期数据记录时各个传感器产生的产品的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of cross-calibrating ocean-color sensors in polar orbit using an intermediary geostationary sensor of reference
A generic methodology is presented to cross-calibrate satellite ocean-color sensors in polar orbit via an intermediary geostationary sensor of reference. In this study, AHI onboard Hiwamari-8 is used as the intermediary sensor to cross-calibrate SGLI onboard GCOM-C and MODIS onboard Aqua and Terra (MODIS-A and MODIS-T) after system vicarious calibration (SVC). Numerous coincidences were obtained near the Equator using 3 days of imagery, i.e., 11 May 2018, 22 January 2019, and 25 January 2020. Spectral matching to AHI spectral bands was first performed for a wide range of angular geometry, aerosol conditions, and Case 1 waters using a single band or multiple bands of SGLI, MODIS-A and MODIS-T, yielding root mean square differences of 0.1–0.7% in the blue and green and 0.7%–3.7% in the red depending on the band combination. Limited by the inherent AHI instrument noise and the system vicarious calibration of individual polar-orbiting sensors, cross-calibration was only performed for equivalent AHI bands centered on at 471, 510, and 639 nm. Results show that MODIS-A and MODIS-T are accurately cross-calibrated, with cross-calibration ratios differing by 0.1%–0.8% in magnitude. These differences are within or slightly outside the estimated uncertainties of ±0.6% to ±1.0%. In contrast, SGLI shows larger cross-calibration differences, i.e., 1.4%, 3.4%, and 1.1% with MODIS-A and 1.5%, 4.6%, and 1.5% with MODIS-T, respectively. These differences are above uncertainties of ±0.8–1.0% at 471 and 510 nm and within uncertainties of ±2.3% and ±1.9% at 639 nm. Such differences may introduce significant discrepancies between ocean-color products generated from SGLI and MODIS data, although some compensation may occur because different atmospheric correction schemes are used to process SGLI and MODIS imagery, and SVC is based on the selected scheme. Geostationary sensors with ocean color capability have potential to improve the spectral matching and reduce uncertainties, as long as they provide imagery at sufficient cadence over equatorial regions. The methodology is applicable to polar-orbiting optical sensors in general and can be implemented operationally to ensure consistency of products generated by individual sensors in establishing long-term data records for climate studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A near-real-time tropical deforestation monitoring algorithm based on the CuSum change detection method Suitability of different in-water algorithms for eutrophic and absorbing waters applied to Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 OLCI data Sea surface barometry with an O2 differential absorption radar: retrieval algorithm development and simulation Assessment of advanced neural networks for the dual estimation of water quality indicators and their uncertainties Selecting HyperNav deployment sites for calibrating and validating PACE ocean color observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1