莎士比亚对话中的礼貌互惠

Jonathan Culpeper, Samuel J. Oliver, Vittorio Tantucci
{"title":"莎士比亚对话中的礼貌互惠","authors":"Jonathan Culpeper, Samuel J. Oliver, Vittorio Tantucci","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00053.cul","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recently, it has been proposed that (im)politeness in interaction today is governed in large part by a Principle\n of (Im)politeness Reciprocity (Culpeper and Tantucci 2021). This paper investigates\n whether politeness reciprocity works similarly in early modern English – specifically, in the plays of Shakespeare. Focussing on\n thanking behaviours, the questions of whether politeness reciprocity can be detected, and, if so, how social status might\n influence the nature of reciprocity, are addressed. The first part of the paper establishes that Early Modern English politeness\n behaviours were being discussed in terms associated with reciprocity (e.g., metaphors relating to balance and financial/commercial\n transactions). Then, all the instances of the two main thanking formula patterns (the verbal first person pronoun +\n thanks + second person pronoun and the nominal thanks) were extracted from\n thirty-eight plays attributed wholly or substantially to Shakespeare, and coded for a number of variables, including the\n weightiness of the gift for which thanks has been given, the amount of effort expended in performing thanks, and the social\n statuses of the Thanker and Thankee. The results show that reciprocity does govern thanking behaviours, and that social status\n licences imbalances in those behaviours. The paper also touches on conventionalisation.","PeriodicalId":446907,"journal":{"name":"Historical Pragmatics today","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politeness reciprocity in Shakespeare’s dialogue\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Culpeper, Samuel J. Oliver, Vittorio Tantucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00053.cul\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Recently, it has been proposed that (im)politeness in interaction today is governed in large part by a Principle\\n of (Im)politeness Reciprocity (Culpeper and Tantucci 2021). This paper investigates\\n whether politeness reciprocity works similarly in early modern English – specifically, in the plays of Shakespeare. Focussing on\\n thanking behaviours, the questions of whether politeness reciprocity can be detected, and, if so, how social status might\\n influence the nature of reciprocity, are addressed. The first part of the paper establishes that Early Modern English politeness\\n behaviours were being discussed in terms associated with reciprocity (e.g., metaphors relating to balance and financial/commercial\\n transactions). Then, all the instances of the two main thanking formula patterns (the verbal first person pronoun +\\n thanks + second person pronoun and the nominal thanks) were extracted from\\n thirty-eight plays attributed wholly or substantially to Shakespeare, and coded for a number of variables, including the\\n weightiness of the gift for which thanks has been given, the amount of effort expended in performing thanks, and the social\\n statuses of the Thanker and Thankee. The results show that reciprocity does govern thanking behaviours, and that social status\\n licences imbalances in those behaviours. The paper also touches on conventionalisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Pragmatics today\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Pragmatics today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00053.cul\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Pragmatics today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00053.cul","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近,有人提出,今天互动中的(im)礼貌在很大程度上是由(im)礼貌互惠原则支配的(Culpeper和Tantucci 2021)。本文研究了礼貌互惠在早期现代英语中是否也起着类似的作用,特别是在莎士比亚的戏剧中。关注感谢行为,是否可以检测到礼貌互惠的问题,如果可以,社会地位如何影响互惠的性质,被解决。论文的第一部分确立了早期现代英语礼貌行为被讨论与互惠相关的术语(例如,与平衡和金融/商业交易有关的隐喻)。然后,两种主要的感谢模式(口头第一人称代词+感谢+第二人称代词和名义上的感谢)的所有实例都是从完全或基本上属于莎士比亚的38部戏剧中提取出来的,并根据一些变量进行编码,包括感谢所给予的礼物的重要性,在表达感谢中所花费的努力,以及感谢者和感谢者的社会地位。结果表明,互惠确实支配着感谢行为,而社会地位允许这些行为的不平衡。本文还涉及了约定俗成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Politeness reciprocity in Shakespeare’s dialogue
Recently, it has been proposed that (im)politeness in interaction today is governed in large part by a Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity (Culpeper and Tantucci 2021). This paper investigates whether politeness reciprocity works similarly in early modern English – specifically, in the plays of Shakespeare. Focussing on thanking behaviours, the questions of whether politeness reciprocity can be detected, and, if so, how social status might influence the nature of reciprocity, are addressed. The first part of the paper establishes that Early Modern English politeness behaviours were being discussed in terms associated with reciprocity (e.g., metaphors relating to balance and financial/commercial transactions). Then, all the instances of the two main thanking formula patterns (the verbal first person pronoun + thanks + second person pronoun and the nominal thanks) were extracted from thirty-eight plays attributed wholly or substantially to Shakespeare, and coded for a number of variables, including the weightiness of the gift for which thanks has been given, the amount of effort expended in performing thanks, and the social statuses of the Thanker and Thankee. The results show that reciprocity does govern thanking behaviours, and that social status licences imbalances in those behaviours. The paper also touches on conventionalisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The rise of a concessive “category reassessment” construction Medical book reviews 1665–1800 Looking for concepts in Early Modern English Politeness reciprocity in Shakespeare’s dialogue The sociopragmatic nature of interjections in Early Modern English drama comedy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1