检察官在腐败和洗钱方面的权力。

Ismail Koto
{"title":"检察官在腐败和洗钱方面的权力。","authors":"Ismail Koto","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many facts that occur that the perpetrators of money laundering crimes commit money laundering crimes from the proceeds of their crimes and most are obtained from criminal acts of corruption. Money laundering actors carry out various modes to eliminate traces of their actions. Money Laundering (Money Laudring) as a crime has a characteristic that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. The point is that the crime of Money Laundering is a form of crime committed by either a person or a corporation, although the prosecutor has the authority to combine corruption and money laundering cases, we rarely see the merger between these two crimes. This type of research is a normative juridical research. With the main problem in the form of How is the relationship between corruption as a Predicate Crime in Money Laundering? How is the prosecutor in carrying out his authority to combine Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? What are the Prosecutor's Barriers in Merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? In every anti-money laundering provision there must be an element called a predicate offence, which means that from the results of any crime that can be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Crimes Money laundering. The crime of Corruption and Money Laundering has a very fundamental relationship or relationship. If there is a merger of investigations into cases of corruption and money laundering, the Prosecutor must make a description of the two crimes in one indictment so that the indictment is in the form of an alternative and the Prosecutor must prove the two crimes before the trial. Based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), it is stated that the Public Prosecutor can combine cases and make them into one indictment, if at the same time or almost simultaneously they receive several case files. The prosecutor's obstacle in merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes is that it requires a long investigation time, because investigators must always coordinate with PPATK (Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) to track money and assets of the suspect and coordinate with related parties, in court against the trial process, namely the course of the trial process will take a long time","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara Korupsi Dan Money Laundering (Studi Kejaksaan Tinggi Sumatera Utara)\",\"authors\":\"Ismail Koto\",\"doi\":\"10.55357/is.v2i2.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many facts that occur that the perpetrators of money laundering crimes commit money laundering crimes from the proceeds of their crimes and most are obtained from criminal acts of corruption. Money laundering actors carry out various modes to eliminate traces of their actions. Money Laundering (Money Laudring) as a crime has a characteristic that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. The point is that the crime of Money Laundering is a form of crime committed by either a person or a corporation, although the prosecutor has the authority to combine corruption and money laundering cases, we rarely see the merger between these two crimes. This type of research is a normative juridical research. With the main problem in the form of How is the relationship between corruption as a Predicate Crime in Money Laundering? How is the prosecutor in carrying out his authority to combine Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? What are the Prosecutor's Barriers in Merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? In every anti-money laundering provision there must be an element called a predicate offence, which means that from the results of any crime that can be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Crimes Money laundering. The crime of Corruption and Money Laundering has a very fundamental relationship or relationship. If there is a merger of investigations into cases of corruption and money laundering, the Prosecutor must make a description of the two crimes in one indictment so that the indictment is in the form of an alternative and the Prosecutor must prove the two crimes before the trial. Based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), it is stated that the Public Prosecutor can combine cases and make them into one indictment, if at the same time or almost simultaneously they receive several case files. The prosecutor's obstacle in merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes is that it requires a long investigation time, because investigators must always coordinate with PPATK (Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) to track money and assets of the suspect and coordinate with related parties, in court against the trial process, namely the course of the trial process will take a long time\",\"PeriodicalId\":437261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

洗钱犯罪的实施者利用犯罪所得实施洗钱犯罪的事实很多,而且多数是通过腐败犯罪行为获得的。洗钱行为人采取各种方式消除其行为痕迹。洗钱(Money Laudring)作为一种犯罪,其特点是该犯罪不是单一犯罪,而是双重犯罪。重点是,洗钱罪是一种个人或企业的犯罪形式,虽然检察官有权将腐败和洗钱案件合并,但我们很少看到这两种犯罪之间的合并。这种类型的研究是一种规范的法学研究。其主要问题表现为腐败作为洗钱犯罪的上游犯罪关系如何?检察官如何行使职权,将贪污罪与洗黑钱罪合并处理?贪污犯罪与洗钱犯罪合并的检察官障碍是什么?在每一个反洗钱条款中都必须有一个称为上游犯罪的要素,这意味着从任何犯罪的结果来看,都可以受到2010年关于洗钱罪的第8号法第3条、第4条和第5条的规定的约束。腐败与洗钱犯罪有着非常根本的关系或关系。如果对贪污和洗钱案件进行合并调查,检察官必须在一份起诉书中说明这两项罪行,以便起诉书是一种替代形式,检察官必须在审判前证明这两项罪行。根据《刑事诉讼法》第141条的规定,如果检察官同时或几乎同时收到几份案件卷宗,可以将案件合并为一份起诉书。检察官将贪污罪与洗钱罪合并的障碍在于调查时间长,因为调查人员必须始终配合PPATK(金融交易报告与分析中心)追踪嫌疑人的资金和资产,并与相关方协调,在法庭上不利于审判过程,即审判过程的过程将花费很长时间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara Korupsi Dan Money Laundering (Studi Kejaksaan Tinggi Sumatera Utara)
There are many facts that occur that the perpetrators of money laundering crimes commit money laundering crimes from the proceeds of their crimes and most are obtained from criminal acts of corruption. Money laundering actors carry out various modes to eliminate traces of their actions. Money Laundering (Money Laudring) as a crime has a characteristic that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. The point is that the crime of Money Laundering is a form of crime committed by either a person or a corporation, although the prosecutor has the authority to combine corruption and money laundering cases, we rarely see the merger between these two crimes. This type of research is a normative juridical research. With the main problem in the form of How is the relationship between corruption as a Predicate Crime in Money Laundering? How is the prosecutor in carrying out his authority to combine Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? What are the Prosecutor's Barriers in Merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? In every anti-money laundering provision there must be an element called a predicate offence, which means that from the results of any crime that can be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Crimes Money laundering. The crime of Corruption and Money Laundering has a very fundamental relationship or relationship. If there is a merger of investigations into cases of corruption and money laundering, the Prosecutor must make a description of the two crimes in one indictment so that the indictment is in the form of an alternative and the Prosecutor must prove the two crimes before the trial. Based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), it is stated that the Public Prosecutor can combine cases and make them into one indictment, if at the same time or almost simultaneously they receive several case files. The prosecutor's obstacle in merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes is that it requires a long investigation time, because investigators must always coordinate with PPATK (Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) to track money and assets of the suspect and coordinate with related parties, in court against the trial process, namely the course of the trial process will take a long time
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Perikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) dalam Kegiatan Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Tinjauan Yuridis Kerugian Negara Dalam Kerja Sama Operasional (KSO) Investasi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Yayasan Yang Didirikan Oleh BUMN (Studi Kasus Yayasan Bapelkes Krakatau Steel) Urgensi Penerapan Omnibus law Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pembentukan Regulasi Di Indonesia Kedudukan Hukum Pria Yang Melakukan Perkawinan Nyentana Sebagai Ahli Waris Dalam Hukum Waris Adat Masyarakat Bali (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2991K/PDT/2015) Perspektif Kesejahteraan Tenagakerja Dengan Model Penetapan Upah Minimum Kabupaten Kota
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1