低阻尼复零点附近的直接自适应调节——在振动主动控制中的应用

Abraham Castellanos Silva, I. Landau, Petros A. Ioannou
{"title":"低阻尼复零点附近的直接自适应调节——在振动主动控制中的应用","authors":"Abraham Castellanos Silva, I. Landau, Petros A. Ioannou","doi":"10.1109/MED.2014.6961380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adaptive feedback approach is now widely used for the rejection of multiple narrow band disturbances with unknown and time varying frequencies in Active Vibration Control (AVC) and Active Noise Control (ANC). The approach is based directly or indirectly on the use of the Internal Model Principle and the Youla-Kučera parametrization combined with an adaptive law. All the algorithms associated with the approach make the assumption that the plant zeros are different from the poles of the disturbance model in order to achieve disturbance compensation. However in practice the problem is more intricate since it is not clear what happens if the plant have very low damped complex zeros (often encountered in mechanical structures) and the frequency of the disturbance is close to the anti-resonance frequency (the resonance frequency of the plant zeros). A recent international investigation on adaptive regulation in the presence of unknown time varying disturbances [16] has considered such a situation for a benchmark example. Several solutions have been proposed and the most successful has been based on the appropriate choice of the desired closed loop poles to be achieved by the Youla-Kučera central controller [5] using a Q FIR filter with the minimum number of parameters. Recently in [12] it was suggested that over parametrization of the Q (FIR) filter can enhance the robustness of the linear and adaptive scheme in the vicinity of plant complex zeros. The present paper compares these two approaches using the same benchmark example as in [16]. The results from simulations and real time experiments used to evaluate the two approaches are presented.","PeriodicalId":127957,"journal":{"name":"22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct adaptive regulation in the vicinity of low damped complex zeros — Application to active vibration control\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Castellanos Silva, I. Landau, Petros A. Ioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MED.2014.6961380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adaptive feedback approach is now widely used for the rejection of multiple narrow band disturbances with unknown and time varying frequencies in Active Vibration Control (AVC) and Active Noise Control (ANC). The approach is based directly or indirectly on the use of the Internal Model Principle and the Youla-Kučera parametrization combined with an adaptive law. All the algorithms associated with the approach make the assumption that the plant zeros are different from the poles of the disturbance model in order to achieve disturbance compensation. However in practice the problem is more intricate since it is not clear what happens if the plant have very low damped complex zeros (often encountered in mechanical structures) and the frequency of the disturbance is close to the anti-resonance frequency (the resonance frequency of the plant zeros). A recent international investigation on adaptive regulation in the presence of unknown time varying disturbances [16] has considered such a situation for a benchmark example. Several solutions have been proposed and the most successful has been based on the appropriate choice of the desired closed loop poles to be achieved by the Youla-Kučera central controller [5] using a Q FIR filter with the minimum number of parameters. Recently in [12] it was suggested that over parametrization of the Q (FIR) filter can enhance the robustness of the linear and adaptive scheme in the vicinity of plant complex zeros. The present paper compares these two approaches using the same benchmark example as in [16]. The results from simulations and real time experiments used to evaluate the two approaches are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2014.6961380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2014.6961380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在主动振动控制(AVC)和主动噪声控制(ANC)中,自适应反馈方法被广泛用于抑制未知时变频率的多窄带干扰。该方法直接或间接地基于内部模型原理和youla - ku era参数化与自适应律的结合。与该方法相关的所有算法都假设植物零点与扰动模型的极点不同,以实现扰动补偿。然而,在实践中,问题更加复杂,因为不清楚如果对象具有非常低的阻尼复零(经常在机械结构中遇到)并且干扰的频率接近反共振频率(对象零的共振频率)会发生什么。最近一项关于存在未知时变扰动的自适应调节的国际研究[16]已经将这种情况作为基准示例。已经提出了几种解决方案,最成功的解决方案是基于youla - ku时代中央控制器[5]使用具有最小参数数量的Q FIR滤波器来实现所需闭环极点的适当选择。最近在[12]中提出,Q (FIR)滤波器的过参数化可以增强线性和自适应方案在植物复零附近的鲁棒性。本文使用[16]中相同的基准示例比较了这两种方法。给出了两种方法的仿真和实时实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct adaptive regulation in the vicinity of low damped complex zeros — Application to active vibration control
The adaptive feedback approach is now widely used for the rejection of multiple narrow band disturbances with unknown and time varying frequencies in Active Vibration Control (AVC) and Active Noise Control (ANC). The approach is based directly or indirectly on the use of the Internal Model Principle and the Youla-Kučera parametrization combined with an adaptive law. All the algorithms associated with the approach make the assumption that the plant zeros are different from the poles of the disturbance model in order to achieve disturbance compensation. However in practice the problem is more intricate since it is not clear what happens if the plant have very low damped complex zeros (often encountered in mechanical structures) and the frequency of the disturbance is close to the anti-resonance frequency (the resonance frequency of the plant zeros). A recent international investigation on adaptive regulation in the presence of unknown time varying disturbances [16] has considered such a situation for a benchmark example. Several solutions have been proposed and the most successful has been based on the appropriate choice of the desired closed loop poles to be achieved by the Youla-Kučera central controller [5] using a Q FIR filter with the minimum number of parameters. Recently in [12] it was suggested that over parametrization of the Q (FIR) filter can enhance the robustness of the linear and adaptive scheme in the vicinity of plant complex zeros. The present paper compares these two approaches using the same benchmark example as in [16]. The results from simulations and real time experiments used to evaluate the two approaches are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online adaptive geometry predictor of aquaculture fish-nets Mathematical study of the global dynamics of a concave gene expression model Placement of fixed modes by decentralised output feedback control Identification and switching quasi-LPV control of a four wheeled omnidirectional robot Robust anomaly detection in dynamic networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1