认证计量单位安全政策

Grigore Roşu, Feng Chen
{"title":"认证计量单位安全政策","authors":"Grigore Roşu, Feng Chen","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2003.1240326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement unit safety policy checking is a topic in software analysis concerned with ensuring that programs do not violate basic principles of units of measurement. Such violations can hide significant domain-specific errors which are hard or impossible to find otherwise. Measurement unit analysis by means of automatic deduction is addressed in this paper. We draw general design principles for measurement unit certification tools and discuss our prototype for the C language, which includes both dynamic and static checkers. Our approach is based on assume/assert annotations of code, which are properly interpreted by our deduction-based tools and ignored by standard compilers. We do not modify the language in order to support units. The approach can be extended to incorporate other safety policies without great efforts.","PeriodicalId":114604,"journal":{"name":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"42 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Certifying measurement unit safety policy\",\"authors\":\"Grigore Roşu, Feng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2003.1240326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Measurement unit safety policy checking is a topic in software analysis concerned with ensuring that programs do not violate basic principles of units of measurement. Such violations can hide significant domain-specific errors which are hard or impossible to find otherwise. Measurement unit analysis by means of automatic deduction is addressed in this paper. We draw general design principles for measurement unit certification tools and discuss our prototype for the C language, which includes both dynamic and static checkers. Our approach is based on assume/assert annotations of code, which are properly interpreted by our deduction-based tools and ignored by standard compilers. We do not modify the language in order to support units. The approach can be extended to incorporate other safety policies without great efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

度量单元安全策略检查是软件分析中的一个主题,涉及确保程序不违反度量单元的基本原则。这样的违反可能会隐藏重要的特定于领域的错误,否则很难或不可能发现这些错误。本文讨论了用自动推导的方法对测量单元进行分析。我们提出了测量单元认证工具的一般设计原则,并讨论了我们的C语言原型,其中包括动态和静态检查器。我们的方法基于代码的假设/断言注释,这些注释由我们基于演绎的工具正确解释,而被标准编译器忽略。我们不会为了支持单位而修改语言。这种方法可以扩展到其他安全政策,而无需付出很大努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Certifying measurement unit safety policy
Measurement unit safety policy checking is a topic in software analysis concerned with ensuring that programs do not violate basic principles of units of measurement. Such violations can hide significant domain-specific errors which are hard or impossible to find otherwise. Measurement unit analysis by means of automatic deduction is addressed in this paper. We draw general design principles for measurement unit certification tools and discuss our prototype for the C language, which includes both dynamic and static checkers. Our approach is based on assume/assert annotations of code, which are properly interpreted by our deduction-based tools and ignored by standard compilers. We do not modify the language in order to support units. The approach can be extended to incorporate other safety policies without great efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual constraint diagrams: runtime conformance checking of UML object models versus implementations A model-driven approach to non-functional analysis of software architectures Overview of OpenModel-based validation with partial information Semi-automatic fault localization and behavior verification for physical system simulation models Automation for exception freedom proofs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1