历史、文化认同与差异:法国国家媒体中土耳其加入欧盟的问题

Rabah Aissaoui
{"title":"历史、文化认同与差异:法国国家媒体中土耳其加入欧盟的问题","authors":"Rabah Aissaoui","doi":"10.1080/14613190701216896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After four decades of strenuous attempts to join the European Union (EU) and a period of intense negotiations and political manoeuvring, Turkey finally managed to secure an agreement with the EU to open membership negotiations on 4 October 2005. This decision taken in Brussels was hailed by Abdullah Gül, the Turkish Foreign Minister, as a ‘historic moment’ and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stated that it represented a ‘giant leap’ for Turkey. Turkey was, to some extent, rewarded for the wide-ranging reforms that it has adopted over the 45 years since its decision to be part of the European project but also for the Western-inspired cultural, political and social transformation the country has experienced since the early years of the Kemalist era in the 1920s. In the final months of 2004, the issue of whether or not Turkey should be granted the right to start negotiations triggered heated debates in the French political and media scenes about the validity of allowing ‘in our midst’ a nation that many viewed as the quintessential ‘other’. The arguments that were exchanged divided politicians, journalists and other intellectuals across traditional political lines. Whilst Jacques Chirac remained in favour of Turkish membership, Conservative members of Parliament from Chirac’s majority and led by Philippe Pézemec called for a ‘national mobilization’ against Turkish entry to the EU. Ex-President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who had recently chaired the Convention on the European Constitution, declared himself against Turkey’s bid as did, on the left, ex-Socialist Prime Minister Laurent Fabius and Member of Parliament Manuel Valls, thereby challenging the Socialist Party’s generally favourable stance on Turkey’s entry.","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History, cultural identity and difference: the issue of Turkey's accession to the European Union in the French national press\",\"authors\":\"Rabah Aissaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190701216896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After four decades of strenuous attempts to join the European Union (EU) and a period of intense negotiations and political manoeuvring, Turkey finally managed to secure an agreement with the EU to open membership negotiations on 4 October 2005. This decision taken in Brussels was hailed by Abdullah Gül, the Turkish Foreign Minister, as a ‘historic moment’ and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stated that it represented a ‘giant leap’ for Turkey. Turkey was, to some extent, rewarded for the wide-ranging reforms that it has adopted over the 45 years since its decision to be part of the European project but also for the Western-inspired cultural, political and social transformation the country has experienced since the early years of the Kemalist era in the 1920s. In the final months of 2004, the issue of whether or not Turkey should be granted the right to start negotiations triggered heated debates in the French political and media scenes about the validity of allowing ‘in our midst’ a nation that many viewed as the quintessential ‘other’. The arguments that were exchanged divided politicians, journalists and other intellectuals across traditional political lines. Whilst Jacques Chirac remained in favour of Turkish membership, Conservative members of Parliament from Chirac’s majority and led by Philippe Pézemec called for a ‘national mobilization’ against Turkish entry to the EU. Ex-President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who had recently chaired the Convention on the European Constitution, declared himself against Turkey’s bid as did, on the left, ex-Socialist Prime Minister Laurent Fabius and Member of Parliament Manuel Valls, thereby challenging the Socialist Party’s generally favourable stance on Turkey’s entry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701216896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701216896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

经过40年的艰苦努力加入欧盟(EU)和一段时间的紧张谈判和政治操纵,土耳其终于设法与欧盟达成协议,于2005年10月4日开始成员国谈判。在布鲁塞尔做出的这一决定被土耳其外交部长阿卜杜拉·格 (Abdullah g)誉为“历史性时刻”,土耳其总理雷杰普·塔伊普Erdoğan表示,这代表了土耳其的“巨大飞跃”。从某种程度上说,土耳其在决定加入欧洲计划后的45年里进行了广泛的改革,而且自20世纪20年代凯末尔时代初期以来,土耳其经历了受西方启发的文化、政治和社会转型,这在一定程度上得到了回报。在2004年的最后几个月,土耳其是否应该被授予开始谈判的权利的问题在法国政治和媒体场景中引发了激烈的辩论,关于允许一个被许多人视为典型的“他者”的国家“在我们中间”的有效性。双方的争论使政治家、记者和其他知识分子跨越了传统的政治界线。虽然雅克·希拉克仍然支持土耳其加入欧盟,但以菲利普·帕姆泽梅克为首的议会保守党议员呼吁进行“全国动员”,反对土耳其加入欧盟。最近主持《欧洲宪法公约》的前总统瓦尔杰里·季斯卡·德斯坦和左翼的前社会党总理洛朗·法比尤斯和议会议员曼努埃尔·瓦尔斯一样,宣布反对土耳其的申请,从而挑战社会党对土耳其加入的普遍有利立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
History, cultural identity and difference: the issue of Turkey's accession to the European Union in the French national press
After four decades of strenuous attempts to join the European Union (EU) and a period of intense negotiations and political manoeuvring, Turkey finally managed to secure an agreement with the EU to open membership negotiations on 4 October 2005. This decision taken in Brussels was hailed by Abdullah Gül, the Turkish Foreign Minister, as a ‘historic moment’ and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stated that it represented a ‘giant leap’ for Turkey. Turkey was, to some extent, rewarded for the wide-ranging reforms that it has adopted over the 45 years since its decision to be part of the European project but also for the Western-inspired cultural, political and social transformation the country has experienced since the early years of the Kemalist era in the 1920s. In the final months of 2004, the issue of whether or not Turkey should be granted the right to start negotiations triggered heated debates in the French political and media scenes about the validity of allowing ‘in our midst’ a nation that many viewed as the quintessential ‘other’. The arguments that were exchanged divided politicians, journalists and other intellectuals across traditional political lines. Whilst Jacques Chirac remained in favour of Turkish membership, Conservative members of Parliament from Chirac’s majority and led by Philippe Pézemec called for a ‘national mobilization’ against Turkish entry to the EU. Ex-President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who had recently chaired the Convention on the European Constitution, declared himself against Turkey’s bid as did, on the left, ex-Socialist Prime Minister Laurent Fabius and Member of Parliament Manuel Valls, thereby challenging the Socialist Party’s generally favourable stance on Turkey’s entry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1