消费与需求修辞

C. Campbell
{"title":"消费与需求修辞","authors":"C. Campbell","doi":"10.1093/JDH/11.3.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both academic and popular discussion of consumption tend to centre around two dominant discourses or rhetorics. These are those of need (satisfaction) and want (desire). These rhetorics relate to contrasting models of human action with associated ideologies. The need rhetoric has its origin in a Puritan-inspired utilitarian philosophy of comfort and satisfaction, while the want or desire rhetoric has its origin in a Romantic-inspired philosophy of pleasure-seeking. Although both ideologies and their associated rhetorics are institutionalized in contemporary society, it is the former that tends to have greater legitimacy. This paper looks at the various relationships which it has been suggested exist between these two rhetorics in theories of consumption, examining these as they have been represented historically, bio-psychologically and sociologically. Finally, materialfrom the author's current research on shopping is used to demonstrate how these two rhetorics are related to gender roles, as well as employed by individuals to help them accomplish their consumption goals.","PeriodicalId":402602,"journal":{"name":"Consumption and Consumer Society","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumption and the Rhetorics of Need and Want\",\"authors\":\"C. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JDH/11.3.235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both academic and popular discussion of consumption tend to centre around two dominant discourses or rhetorics. These are those of need (satisfaction) and want (desire). These rhetorics relate to contrasting models of human action with associated ideologies. The need rhetoric has its origin in a Puritan-inspired utilitarian philosophy of comfort and satisfaction, while the want or desire rhetoric has its origin in a Romantic-inspired philosophy of pleasure-seeking. Although both ideologies and their associated rhetorics are institutionalized in contemporary society, it is the former that tends to have greater legitimacy. This paper looks at the various relationships which it has been suggested exist between these two rhetorics in theories of consumption, examining these as they have been represented historically, bio-psychologically and sociologically. Finally, materialfrom the author's current research on shopping is used to demonstrate how these two rhetorics are related to gender roles, as well as employed by individuals to help them accomplish their consumption goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumption and Consumer Society\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumption and Consumer Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JDH/11.3.235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption and Consumer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JDH/11.3.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

学术和大众对消费的讨论都倾向于围绕两种占主导地位的话语或修辞。这些是需要(满足)和欲望(欲望)。这些修辞学涉及到人类行为模式与相关意识形态的对比。“需要”修辞起源于清教徒的舒适和满足的功利主义哲学,而“想要”或“欲望”修辞则起源于浪漫主义的享乐哲学。尽管意识形态及其相关修辞在当代社会都已制度化,但前者往往具有更大的合法性。本文着眼于在消费理论中这两种修辞之间存在的各种关系,研究这些关系,因为它们在历史上、生物心理学上和社会学上都有代表。最后,作者目前对购物的研究材料被用来证明这两种修辞是如何与性别角色相关的,以及如何被个人用来帮助他们实现消费目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumption and the Rhetorics of Need and Want
Both academic and popular discussion of consumption tend to centre around two dominant discourses or rhetorics. These are those of need (satisfaction) and want (desire). These rhetorics relate to contrasting models of human action with associated ideologies. The need rhetoric has its origin in a Puritan-inspired utilitarian philosophy of comfort and satisfaction, while the want or desire rhetoric has its origin in a Romantic-inspired philosophy of pleasure-seeking. Although both ideologies and their associated rhetorics are institutionalized in contemporary society, it is the former that tends to have greater legitimacy. This paper looks at the various relationships which it has been suggested exist between these two rhetorics in theories of consumption, examining these as they have been represented historically, bio-psychologically and sociologically. Finally, materialfrom the author's current research on shopping is used to demonstrate how these two rhetorics are related to gender roles, as well as employed by individuals to help them accomplish their consumption goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Curse of the New: How the Accelerating Pursuit of the New Is Driving Hyper-Consumption Conspicuous Confusion? A Critique of Veblen’s Theory of Conspicuous Consumption Consuming Goods and the Good of Consuming A Matter of Necessity: Reflections on Need and Want in a Time of Lockdown The Meaning of Objects and the Meaning of Actions: A Critical Note on the Sociology of Consumption and Theories of Clothing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1