自由、选择和同意。关于自由意志家长主义困境的注解

A. Marciano
{"title":"自由、选择和同意。关于自由意志家长主义困境的注解","authors":"A. Marciano","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2433007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this note is to discuss libertarian paternalism from the perspective of the concept of “freedom of choice”. For libertarian paternalists, freedom remains defined as it is defined by neo-classical economists and “consent” to the conditions of choice is never envisaged as an issue. Actually, it may even be said that “consent” does not fit into the framework adopted by libertarian paternalists. Thus, libertarian paternalists face a dilemma: if they draw all the consequences of their behavioral assumptions – and have to take “consent” into account – but then taking consent into account is not compatible with their behavioral framework.","PeriodicalId":106117,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freedom, Choice and Consent. A Note on a Libertarian Paternalist Dilemma\",\"authors\":\"A. Marciano\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2433007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this note is to discuss libertarian paternalism from the perspective of the concept of “freedom of choice”. For libertarian paternalists, freedom remains defined as it is defined by neo-classical economists and “consent” to the conditions of choice is never envisaged as an issue. Actually, it may even be said that “consent” does not fit into the framework adopted by libertarian paternalists. Thus, libertarian paternalists face a dilemma: if they draw all the consequences of their behavioral assumptions – and have to take “consent” into account – but then taking consent into account is not compatible with their behavioral framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文的目的是从“选择自由”的角度来讨论自由意志主义的家长式作风。对于自由意志主义家长主义者来说,自由的定义仍然是新古典经济学家所定义的,对选择条件的“同意”从未被设想为一个问题。实际上,甚至可以说,“同意”并不符合自由意志主义家长所采用的框架。因此,自由意志主义家长主义者面临着一个两难境地:如果他们得出他们行为假设的所有结果——并且必须考虑到“同意”——但是考虑到同意与他们的行为框架是不相容的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Freedom, Choice and Consent. A Note on a Libertarian Paternalist Dilemma
The purpose of this note is to discuss libertarian paternalism from the perspective of the concept of “freedom of choice”. For libertarian paternalists, freedom remains defined as it is defined by neo-classical economists and “consent” to the conditions of choice is never envisaged as an issue. Actually, it may even be said that “consent” does not fit into the framework adopted by libertarian paternalists. Thus, libertarian paternalists face a dilemma: if they draw all the consequences of their behavioral assumptions – and have to take “consent” into account – but then taking consent into account is not compatible with their behavioral framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution and Human Activity Reflections of a Physicist on the Cultural Ocean of His Time Living in the 'I' World Commerce Unbound: A Modern Promethean Story Academic Research: The Difficulty of Being Simple and Beautiful
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1