基于指标的图形用户界面美学评价:分割问题

M. Bourguet
{"title":"基于指标的图形用户界面美学评价:分割问题","authors":"M. Bourguet","doi":"10.1145/3280295.3281747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aesthetics has been shown to play a considerable role in system acceptability and perceived usability, hence the importance of studying the aesthetic aspect of user interface design. Computable aesthetics evaluation measures have been proposed that are based on the extraction (or segmentation) of the visual elements that compose the interface layout. In this paper, we observe that many past studies have bypassed the segmentation problem by either using artificial designs, where individual elements are all known a priori, or by doing the segmentation manually. We then report on an experimental study, which demonstrates the impact of different segmentation methods (i.e. manual versus automatic segmentation) on the calculation of the aesthetics evaluation metrics. The segmentation problem remains a bottleneck issue, which impedes the full automation of computational aesthetics evaluation.","PeriodicalId":103928,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Companion International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metrics-Based Evaluation of Graphical User Interface Aesthetics: The Segmentation Problem\",\"authors\":\"M. Bourguet\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3280295.3281747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aesthetics has been shown to play a considerable role in system acceptability and perceived usability, hence the importance of studying the aesthetic aspect of user interface design. Computable aesthetics evaluation measures have been proposed that are based on the extraction (or segmentation) of the visual elements that compose the interface layout. In this paper, we observe that many past studies have bypassed the segmentation problem by either using artificial designs, where individual elements are all known a priori, or by doing the segmentation manually. We then report on an experimental study, which demonstrates the impact of different segmentation methods (i.e. manual versus automatic segmentation) on the calculation of the aesthetics evaluation metrics. The segmentation problem remains a bottleneck issue, which impedes the full automation of computational aesthetics evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Companion International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Companion International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3280295.3281747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Companion International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3280295.3281747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美学已被证明在系统可接受性和感知可用性中起着相当大的作用,因此研究用户界面设计的美学方面非常重要。基于提取(或分割)组成界面布局的视觉元素,提出了可计算的美学评价措施。在本文中,我们观察到许多过去的研究通过使用人工设计绕过了分割问题,其中单个元素都是先验已知的,或者通过手动进行分割。然后,我们报告了一项实验研究,该研究展示了不同的分割方法(即手动与自动分割)对美学评价指标计算的影响。分割问题仍然是一个瓶颈问题,它阻碍了计算美学评价的完全自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metrics-Based Evaluation of Graphical User Interface Aesthetics: The Segmentation Problem
Aesthetics has been shown to play a considerable role in system acceptability and perceived usability, hence the importance of studying the aesthetic aspect of user interface design. Computable aesthetics evaluation measures have been proposed that are based on the extraction (or segmentation) of the visual elements that compose the interface layout. In this paper, we observe that many past studies have bypassed the segmentation problem by either using artificial designs, where individual elements are all known a priori, or by doing the segmentation manually. We then report on an experimental study, which demonstrates the impact of different segmentation methods (i.e. manual versus automatic segmentation) on the calculation of the aesthetics evaluation metrics. The segmentation problem remains a bottleneck issue, which impedes the full automation of computational aesthetics evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Implementation of the Augmented Volleyball Court Somewhat Strange Feeling of Touching, Lifting, and Swinging in Mixed-Reality Space - Psychophysical Analysis of Haptic Illusion Caused by Visual Superimposition - An Entropy-based Approach for Computing the Aesthetics of Interfaces Encourage Self-exploration Through an Interactive Chinese Scroll Painting Design Design Preferred Aesthetic User Interface with Eye Movement and Electroencephalography Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1