麦克斯韦的《恶魔》和香农的《选择》中的自反隐喻:寻找通道

{"title":"麦克斯韦的《恶魔》和香农的《选择》中的自反隐喻:寻找通道","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501722950-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN a sense, all language is metaphoric. When a carpenter says that a room is 7 yards long, he is comparing the length of the room with the length of an Anglo-Saxon girdle. When a scientist says that a molecule has a diameter of 2.5 angstroms, the standard has changed but the principle is the same; the object is still understood in terms of its relation to something else.1 A completely unique object, if such a thing were imaginable, could not be described. Lacking metaphoric connections, it would remain inexpressible.2 The question is thus not whether metaphors are used in science as well as literature, but rather how metaphors are constituted in the two disciplines, how they change through time, and how they are affected by the interpretive traditions in which they are embedded.","PeriodicalId":133871,"journal":{"name":"Chaos Bound","volume":"582 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 Self-reflexive Metaphors in Maxwell’s Demon and Shannon’s Choice: Finding the Passages\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/9781501722950-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IN a sense, all language is metaphoric. When a carpenter says that a room is 7 yards long, he is comparing the length of the room with the length of an Anglo-Saxon girdle. When a scientist says that a molecule has a diameter of 2.5 angstroms, the standard has changed but the principle is the same; the object is still understood in terms of its relation to something else.1 A completely unique object, if such a thing were imaginable, could not be described. Lacking metaphoric connections, it would remain inexpressible.2 The question is thus not whether metaphors are used in science as well as literature, but rather how metaphors are constituted in the two disciplines, how they change through time, and how they are affected by the interpretive traditions in which they are embedded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chaos Bound\",\"volume\":\"582 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chaos Bound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501722950-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos Bound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501722950-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从某种意义上说,所有的语言都是隐喻。当一个木匠说一个房间有7码长时,他是在把房间的长度与盎格鲁-撒克逊腰带的长度进行比较。当一个科学家说一个分子的直径是2.5埃时,标准变了,但原理是一样的;对象仍然是根据它与别的东西的关系来理解的一个完全独特的物体,如果可以想象的话,是无法被描述的。如果没有隐喻的联系,它就无法表达因此,问题不在于隐喻是否在科学和文学中使用,而是隐喻在这两个学科中是如何构成的,它们如何随着时间的推移而变化,以及它们如何受到它们所嵌入的解释传统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 Self-reflexive Metaphors in Maxwell’s Demon and Shannon’s Choice: Finding the Passages
IN a sense, all language is metaphoric. When a carpenter says that a room is 7 yards long, he is comparing the length of the room with the length of an Anglo-Saxon girdle. When a scientist says that a molecule has a diameter of 2.5 angstroms, the standard has changed but the principle is the same; the object is still understood in terms of its relation to something else.1 A completely unique object, if such a thing were imaginable, could not be described. Lacking metaphoric connections, it would remain inexpressible.2 The question is thus not whether metaphors are used in science as well as literature, but rather how metaphors are constituted in the two disciplines, how they change through time, and how they are affected by the interpretive traditions in which they are embedded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3 The Necessary Gap: Chaos as Self in The Education of Henry Adams 4 From Epilogue to Prologue: Chaos and the Arrow of Time 7 Chaos and Poststructuralism 10 Conclusion: Chaos and Culture: Postmodernism(s) and the Denaturing of Experience Selected Bibliography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1