迫切需要一种综合的意识形态方法来解决新兴经济体金字塔底层的贫富悖论。

O. Oladapo
{"title":"迫切需要一种综合的意识形态方法来解决新兴经济体金字塔底层的贫富悖论。","authors":"O. Oladapo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3209822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The BoP is an ideological paradox that has become a compelling and emerging area of research interest representing on one hand the unserved, unreached base of the population billion market and on the other hand a mammoth development conundrum. A preponderant number of studies have established the economic and commercial market potentials of the BoP emphasizing the critical role of multinational companies in addressing the poverty at the base of the pyramid primarily through inclusive capitalism. However, many other studies have equally focused on the humongous development needs of the BoP Segment, with particular reference to the role of state actors and policy instrument in addressing the development and poverty challenges of the BoP. Such studies frowned at the BoP mischaracterization as a compelling viable market rather than a social development project imperative. Consequently, studies conducted on the BoP have strongly reflected the ideological divergence of researchers in terms of their conceptual view of the BoP as a consumer market or a development imperative. The objective of this study is to deconstruct and highlight the critical points of difference between these ideological positions on the BoP and establish an imperative for research focus on more integrated approach that combines both the inclusive capitalism and social development approaches to examining and dealing with the BoP.","PeriodicalId":344620,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imperative for an Integrated Ideological Approach for Addressing the Wealth and Poverty Paradox at the Bottom of the Pyramid in Emerging Economies.\",\"authors\":\"O. Oladapo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3209822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The BoP is an ideological paradox that has become a compelling and emerging area of research interest representing on one hand the unserved, unreached base of the population billion market and on the other hand a mammoth development conundrum. A preponderant number of studies have established the economic and commercial market potentials of the BoP emphasizing the critical role of multinational companies in addressing the poverty at the base of the pyramid primarily through inclusive capitalism. However, many other studies have equally focused on the humongous development needs of the BoP Segment, with particular reference to the role of state actors and policy instrument in addressing the development and poverty challenges of the BoP. Such studies frowned at the BoP mischaracterization as a compelling viable market rather than a social development project imperative. Consequently, studies conducted on the BoP have strongly reflected the ideological divergence of researchers in terms of their conceptual view of the BoP as a consumer market or a development imperative. The objective of this study is to deconstruct and highlight the critical points of difference between these ideological positions on the BoP and establish an imperative for research focus on more integrated approach that combines both the inclusive capitalism and social development approaches to examining and dealing with the BoP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际收支平衡是一种意识形态上的悖论,它已成为一个引人注目的新兴研究领域,一方面代表着这个10亿人口市场中尚未得到服务、尚未触及的基础群体,另一方面也代表着一个巨大的发展难题。大量的研究已经确立了收支平衡的经济和商业市场潜力,强调跨国公司在主要通过包容性资本主义解决金字塔底层贫困问题方面的关键作用。然而,许多其他研究同样关注国际收支部门的巨大发展需求,特别提到国家行为者和政策工具在解决国际收支部门的发展和贫困挑战方面的作用。这些研究对将国际收支平衡系统错误地描述为一个令人信服的可行市场,而不是一个社会发展项目的必要性表示不满。因此,对国际收支平衡表进行的研究强烈地反映了研究人员对国际收支平衡表作为消费市场或发展必需品的概念看法的意识形态分歧。本研究的目的是解构和突出这些关于国际收支平衡的意识形态立场之间的关键不同点,并建立一种必要的研究方法,将包容性资本主义和社会发展方法结合起来,研究和处理国际收支平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Imperative for an Integrated Ideological Approach for Addressing the Wealth and Poverty Paradox at the Bottom of the Pyramid in Emerging Economies.
The BoP is an ideological paradox that has become a compelling and emerging area of research interest representing on one hand the unserved, unreached base of the population billion market and on the other hand a mammoth development conundrum. A preponderant number of studies have established the economic and commercial market potentials of the BoP emphasizing the critical role of multinational companies in addressing the poverty at the base of the pyramid primarily through inclusive capitalism. However, many other studies have equally focused on the humongous development needs of the BoP Segment, with particular reference to the role of state actors and policy instrument in addressing the development and poverty challenges of the BoP. Such studies frowned at the BoP mischaracterization as a compelling viable market rather than a social development project imperative. Consequently, studies conducted on the BoP have strongly reflected the ideological divergence of researchers in terms of their conceptual view of the BoP as a consumer market or a development imperative. The objective of this study is to deconstruct and highlight the critical points of difference between these ideological positions on the BoP and establish an imperative for research focus on more integrated approach that combines both the inclusive capitalism and social development approaches to examining and dealing with the BoP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zooming In or Zooming Out: Entrants' Product Portfolios in the Nascent Drone Industry Pricing Frictions and Platform Remedies: The Case of Airbnb More Bang for Your Buck: Effective Kol Marketing Campaign in Emerging Short-Video Markets Startup Product Development and Financing Decisions against a Market Incumbent The Influence of Product Mix on Sales Growth of Ayurvedic Products in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1