自由贸易的理由——没有“如果”或“但是”

J. Jessop
{"title":"自由贸易的理由——没有“如果”或“但是”","authors":"J. Jessop","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 1990 to 2010, free trade helped a billion people lift themselves out of extreme poverty. But the pace of liberalisation has since slowed and protectionism is back in fashion. Fortunately, Brexit provides a golden opportunity for the UK to become a global champion of free trade again. This is potentially a win-win both for the UK and for the rest of the world. Admittedly, it won’t be easy. Powerful lobbies protect the interests of the few who might lose out from a further reduction in trade barriers, rather than the many who would gain. The voices of consumers are rarely heard. Even the economics commentariat is susceptible to fits of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. This briefing addresses some of the main doubts. Further explanation of any of the points is available on request.","PeriodicalId":426783,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Case for Free Trade – No ‘Ifs’ or ‘Buts’\",\"authors\":\"J. Jessop\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3853715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From 1990 to 2010, free trade helped a billion people lift themselves out of extreme poverty. But the pace of liberalisation has since slowed and protectionism is back in fashion. Fortunately, Brexit provides a golden opportunity for the UK to become a global champion of free trade again. This is potentially a win-win both for the UK and for the rest of the world. Admittedly, it won’t be easy. Powerful lobbies protect the interests of the few who might lose out from a further reduction in trade barriers, rather than the many who would gain. The voices of consumers are rarely heard. Even the economics commentariat is susceptible to fits of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. This briefing addresses some of the main doubts. Further explanation of any of the points is available on request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从1990年到2010年,自由贸易帮助10亿人摆脱了极端贫困。但自那以后,自由化的步伐放缓,保护主义卷土重来。幸运的是,英国脱欧为英国再次成为全球自由贸易捍卫者提供了千载难逢的机遇。这对英国和世界其他地区来说都是潜在的双赢。诚然,这并不容易。强大的游说集团保护的是少数可能从进一步减少贸易壁垒中受损的人的利益,而不是许多将从中受益的人的利益。消费者的声音很少被听到。即使是经济评论员也容易受到“如果”和“但是”的影响。这份简报解决了一些主要的疑问。任何要点的进一步解释可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Case for Free Trade – No ‘Ifs’ or ‘Buts’
From 1990 to 2010, free trade helped a billion people lift themselves out of extreme poverty. But the pace of liberalisation has since slowed and protectionism is back in fashion. Fortunately, Brexit provides a golden opportunity for the UK to become a global champion of free trade again. This is potentially a win-win both for the UK and for the rest of the world. Admittedly, it won’t be easy. Powerful lobbies protect the interests of the few who might lose out from a further reduction in trade barriers, rather than the many who would gain. The voices of consumers are rarely heard. Even the economics commentariat is susceptible to fits of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. This briefing addresses some of the main doubts. Further explanation of any of the points is available on request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade Diversion Effects of the US-China Trade War on Vietnam U.S. International Trade Commission Testimony The New Trade Route: The Story of the IEA, Brexit and the UK's New Approach to Global Trade Biden’s Trade Policies - Recalibrated, More Focused, and a Bit Concerning International Trade Costs in Services: An Empirical Analysis Through Gravity Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1