太阳能电池板最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)技术比较分析

Yogindersing Gajadur, S. Hassen
{"title":"太阳能电池板最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)技术比较分析","authors":"Yogindersing Gajadur, S. Hassen","doi":"10.1109/ELECOM54934.2022.9965223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A photovoltaic panel operates along a non-linear Power-Voltage (P-V) curve. When a load is directly connected to the photovoltaic (PV) panel, the output voltage of the panel changes with the delivered current. The panel’s P-V characteristic shows that the power it delivers is maximum at one particular operating combination of voltage and current, called the Maximum Power point (MPP). However, this MPP is not static and it shifts with varying loads as well as due to changes in temperature, solar irradiance level. This paper compares the performance of three MPPT techniques namely, Perturb and Observe (P&O), Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Fractional Short-Circuit Current (FSCC) of a given PV system through simulation. The PV system is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink environment and it consists of a 20 W PV module supplying power to a resistive load through a DC-DC Boost converter. Algorithms of the three aforementioned MPPT control techniques (PO, FSCC, and SMC) are developed and simulated under changing solar irradiance level and their performances are compared. It was observed that Sliding Mode Control technique has the fastest tracking time and produced the least oscillations at steady state.","PeriodicalId":302869,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Techniques of a Solar Panel\",\"authors\":\"Yogindersing Gajadur, S. Hassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ELECOM54934.2022.9965223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A photovoltaic panel operates along a non-linear Power-Voltage (P-V) curve. When a load is directly connected to the photovoltaic (PV) panel, the output voltage of the panel changes with the delivered current. The panel’s P-V characteristic shows that the power it delivers is maximum at one particular operating combination of voltage and current, called the Maximum Power point (MPP). However, this MPP is not static and it shifts with varying loads as well as due to changes in temperature, solar irradiance level. This paper compares the performance of three MPPT techniques namely, Perturb and Observe (P&O), Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Fractional Short-Circuit Current (FSCC) of a given PV system through simulation. The PV system is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink environment and it consists of a 20 W PV module supplying power to a resistive load through a DC-DC Boost converter. Algorithms of the three aforementioned MPPT control techniques (PO, FSCC, and SMC) are developed and simulated under changing solar irradiance level and their performances are compared. It was observed that Sliding Mode Control technique has the fastest tracking time and produced the least oscillations at steady state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECOM54934.2022.9965223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECOM54934.2022.9965223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

光伏板沿非线性功率-电压(P-V)曲线运行。当负载直接连接到光伏(PV)面板时,面板的输出电压随着输送的电流而变化。面板的P-V特性表明,在一个特定的电压和电流组合下,它提供的功率是最大的,称为最大功率点(MPP)。然而,这个MPP不是静态的,它会随着负载的变化以及温度和太阳辐照度的变化而变化。本文通过仿真比较了给定光伏系统的扰动与观测(P&O)、滑模控制(SMC)和分数短路电流(FSCC)三种MPPT技术的性能。该系统在MATLAB/Simulink环境下建模,由一个20w的PV模块组成,通过DC-DC Boost变换器向电阻性负载供电。开发了上述三种MPPT控制技术(PO、FSCC和SMC)的算法,并对它们在太阳辐照度变化条件下的性能进行了仿真,比较了它们的性能。结果表明,滑模控制技术具有最快的跟踪时间和最小的稳态振荡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Techniques of a Solar Panel
A photovoltaic panel operates along a non-linear Power-Voltage (P-V) curve. When a load is directly connected to the photovoltaic (PV) panel, the output voltage of the panel changes with the delivered current. The panel’s P-V characteristic shows that the power it delivers is maximum at one particular operating combination of voltage and current, called the Maximum Power point (MPP). However, this MPP is not static and it shifts with varying loads as well as due to changes in temperature, solar irradiance level. This paper compares the performance of three MPPT techniques namely, Perturb and Observe (P&O), Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Fractional Short-Circuit Current (FSCC) of a given PV system through simulation. The PV system is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink environment and it consists of a 20 W PV module supplying power to a resistive load through a DC-DC Boost converter. Algorithms of the three aforementioned MPPT control techniques (PO, FSCC, and SMC) are developed and simulated under changing solar irradiance level and their performances are compared. It was observed that Sliding Mode Control technique has the fastest tracking time and produced the least oscillations at steady state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unexpected Analog Signal Change Detector Based on Memristive System Artifact for Strategic Decision-Making by Telecommunication Firms A Web-Based Network Traffic Prediction and Classification Application using Machine Learning An adapted machine learning algorithm based-Fingerprints using RLS to improve indoor Wi-fi localization systems Estimation of Weibull Distribution Parameters by Using Excel Solver Tool for Wind Speed Data at Al-Aziziyah, Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1