{"title":"财务建议和自由裁量权限制","authors":"S. Davies","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2430938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biased recommendations from financial advisors often lead to suboptimal portfolios and unnecessary fees. The compensation contracts used in practice lack high-powered incentive alignment and are incapable of mitigating conflicts of interest. However, all is not lost; individuals can attenuate the agency cost by limiting their advisors' choices via discretion limits. In this paper, I characterize optimal discretion limits. I show that discretion limits resolve much of the agency conflict and that the mechanism is robust. The analysis provides novel recommendations for policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":252294,"journal":{"name":"Household Financial Planning eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Advice and Discretion Limits\",\"authors\":\"S. Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2430938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biased recommendations from financial advisors often lead to suboptimal portfolios and unnecessary fees. The compensation contracts used in practice lack high-powered incentive alignment and are incapable of mitigating conflicts of interest. However, all is not lost; individuals can attenuate the agency cost by limiting their advisors' choices via discretion limits. In this paper, I characterize optimal discretion limits. I show that discretion limits resolve much of the agency conflict and that the mechanism is robust. The analysis provides novel recommendations for policy and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Household Financial Planning eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Household Financial Planning eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2430938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Household Financial Planning eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2430938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biased recommendations from financial advisors often lead to suboptimal portfolios and unnecessary fees. The compensation contracts used in practice lack high-powered incentive alignment and are incapable of mitigating conflicts of interest. However, all is not lost; individuals can attenuate the agency cost by limiting their advisors' choices via discretion limits. In this paper, I characterize optimal discretion limits. I show that discretion limits resolve much of the agency conflict and that the mechanism is robust. The analysis provides novel recommendations for policy and practice.