技术变化下先进加法器的面积与时序分析

Apoorva Raghunandan, RAVISH ARADHYA H V
{"title":"技术变化下先进加法器的面积与时序分析","authors":"Apoorva Raghunandan, RAVISH ARADHYA H V","doi":"10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good VLSI Design is one with low area occupancy and high speed of operation. As per Moore's law the number of transistors on a chip, increase and so does the overall chip Area. Optimizing the parameters of Area and Delay is of high importance in VLSI Design. Performance analysis and comparison of Area occupancy and Delay has been performed for 4 adders - the Ripple Carry Adder (Adder 1), the Kogge Stone Adder (Adder 2), the Carry Skip Adder (Adder 3) and the Brent Kung Adder (Adder 4), each being a 16-bit adder. The Adders were designed using Verilog code and then simulated and synthesized using RTL Encounter tool. Netlists were generated using the nclaunch tool for the three technologies. The Area and Delay results have been obtained for three technologies namely 180nm, 90nm and 45nm. At 180m, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the least area of 1118nm2and Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest Delay of 3.495ns. At 90nm, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the smallest Area of 315nm2 and the Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest delay of 2.957ns. The Ripple Carry Adder has a delay of 3.875ns in [3]. The reduction of delay in the paper is 10.99%.. The Carry Skip Adder has a delay of 8.106ns in [3] and a reduction of 64.16% is obtained in this paper. The Kogge Stone Adder has a delay of 6.7ns in [3]. A delay reduction of 63.65% is obtained in this paper. In [3], The Brent Kung Adder has a delay of 8.094ns. A reduction of 71.14% is obtained Amongst the four adders it has been found that the Brent Kung occupies the least Area of 123nm2 at 45nm and also has the smallest delay of 2.336 ns.","PeriodicalId":269385,"journal":{"name":"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Area and Timing Analysis of Advanced Adders under changing Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Raghunandan, RAVISH ARADHYA H V\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A good VLSI Design is one with low area occupancy and high speed of operation. As per Moore's law the number of transistors on a chip, increase and so does the overall chip Area. Optimizing the parameters of Area and Delay is of high importance in VLSI Design. Performance analysis and comparison of Area occupancy and Delay has been performed for 4 adders - the Ripple Carry Adder (Adder 1), the Kogge Stone Adder (Adder 2), the Carry Skip Adder (Adder 3) and the Brent Kung Adder (Adder 4), each being a 16-bit adder. The Adders were designed using Verilog code and then simulated and synthesized using RTL Encounter tool. Netlists were generated using the nclaunch tool for the three technologies. The Area and Delay results have been obtained for three technologies namely 180nm, 90nm and 45nm. At 180m, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the least area of 1118nm2and Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest Delay of 3.495ns. At 90nm, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the smallest Area of 315nm2 and the Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest delay of 2.957ns. The Ripple Carry Adder has a delay of 3.875ns in [3]. The reduction of delay in the paper is 10.99%.. The Carry Skip Adder has a delay of 8.106ns in [3] and a reduction of 64.16% is obtained in this paper. The Kogge Stone Adder has a delay of 6.7ns in [3]. A delay reduction of 63.65% is obtained in this paper. In [3], The Brent Kung Adder has a delay of 8.094ns. A reduction of 71.14% is obtained Amongst the four adders it has been found that the Brent Kung occupies the least Area of 123nm2 at 45nm and also has the smallest delay of 2.336 ns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一个好的超大规模集成电路设计是一个占地面积小,运行速度快的设计。根据摩尔定律,芯片上晶体管的数量会增加,芯片的总面积也会增加。面积和延迟参数的优化在超大规模集成电路设计中具有重要意义。对4个加法器进行了面积占用和延迟的性能分析和比较——Ripple Carry加法器(Adder 1)、Kogge Stone加法器(Adder 2)、Carry Skip加法器(Adder 3)和Brent Kung加法器(Adder 4),每个加法器都是16位加法器。使用Verilog代码设计了加法器,并使用RTL Encounter工具进行了仿真和合成。网络列表是使用这三种技术的启动工具生成的。得到了180nm、90nm和45nm三种工艺下的面积和延迟结果。在180m处,纹波进位加法器的面积最小,为1118nm2, Kogge Stone加法器的延迟最小,为3.495ns。在90nm处,纹波进位加法器的面积最小,为315nm2, Kogge Stone加法器的延迟最小,为2.957ns。纹波进位加法器在[3]中有3.875ns的延迟。本文的延迟减少率为10.99%。进位跳频加法器在[3]中的延迟为8.106ns,本文的延迟降低了64.16%。Kogge石加法器在[3]中有6.7ns的延迟。本文得到了延迟减少63.65%的结果。在[3]中,Brent Kung Adder的延迟为8.094ns。在四种加法器中,Brent Kung在45nm处占用的面积最小,为123nm2,延迟最小,为2.336 ns。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Area and Timing Analysis of Advanced Adders under changing Technologies
A good VLSI Design is one with low area occupancy and high speed of operation. As per Moore's law the number of transistors on a chip, increase and so does the overall chip Area. Optimizing the parameters of Area and Delay is of high importance in VLSI Design. Performance analysis and comparison of Area occupancy and Delay has been performed for 4 adders - the Ripple Carry Adder (Adder 1), the Kogge Stone Adder (Adder 2), the Carry Skip Adder (Adder 3) and the Brent Kung Adder (Adder 4), each being a 16-bit adder. The Adders were designed using Verilog code and then simulated and synthesized using RTL Encounter tool. Netlists were generated using the nclaunch tool for the three technologies. The Area and Delay results have been obtained for three technologies namely 180nm, 90nm and 45nm. At 180m, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the least area of 1118nm2and Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest Delay of 3.495ns. At 90nm, the Ripple Carry Adder occupies the smallest Area of 315nm2 and the Kogge Stone Adder has the smallest delay of 2.957ns. The Ripple Carry Adder has a delay of 3.875ns in [3]. The reduction of delay in the paper is 10.99%.. The Carry Skip Adder has a delay of 8.106ns in [3] and a reduction of 64.16% is obtained in this paper. The Kogge Stone Adder has a delay of 6.7ns in [3]. A delay reduction of 63.65% is obtained in this paper. In [3], The Brent Kung Adder has a delay of 8.094ns. A reduction of 71.14% is obtained Amongst the four adders it has been found that the Brent Kung occupies the least Area of 123nm2 at 45nm and also has the smallest delay of 2.336 ns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and analysis of an optical transit network IoT Based Automatic Billing System Using Barcode Scanner by Android Device and Monitoring Unregistered Barcode by RFID Feature Extraction of Intra-Pulse Modulated LPI Waveforms Using STFT Implementation of Smart Movable Road Divider and Ambulance Clearance using IoT Energy Reserve Management in Automobile Airbag Control Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1