维生素D和骨骼健康2022:证据钟摆倒转到它的好处吗?

H. Saadi
{"title":"维生素D和骨骼健康2022:证据钟摆倒转到它的好处吗?","authors":"H. Saadi","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1763273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives:  This concise article aims to (a) review the role of vitamin D in bone health, (b) discuss the consequences of vitamin D deficiency, (c) analyze the use of vitamin D to prevent and treat osteoporosis and (d) explore if the evidence pendulum is switching back on the beneficial effects of vitamin D. Materials and Methods:  A narrative nonsystematic review of the literature was done thematically to answer the questions stated in the objectives above. Results:  A literature review suggests that vitamin D deficiency can be a real clinical condition that warrants recognition and management, particularly in high-risk groups. The optimal vitamin D level is likely more than or equal to 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL). The established consequences of vitamin D deficiency in adults include osteomalacia and osteoporosis. Moreover, whether vitamin D supplementation reduces falls and fractures in subjects with baseline vitamin D more than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) is not confirmed. However, vitamin D supplementation is still needed for patients with osteoporosis and those at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. Finally, there is no justification for measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the general population. Conclusions:  For patients at increased risk for osteoporosis, those with vitamin D deficiency, or both, it remains reasonable to consider vitamin D supplementation (800–1,000 IU/d or more), consistent with recommendations of multiple societies.","PeriodicalId":294186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin D and Bone Health 2022: Is the Evidence Pendulum Switching Backward on Its Benefits?\",\"authors\":\"H. Saadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1763273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives:  This concise article aims to (a) review the role of vitamin D in bone health, (b) discuss the consequences of vitamin D deficiency, (c) analyze the use of vitamin D to prevent and treat osteoporosis and (d) explore if the evidence pendulum is switching back on the beneficial effects of vitamin D. Materials and Methods:  A narrative nonsystematic review of the literature was done thematically to answer the questions stated in the objectives above. Results:  A literature review suggests that vitamin D deficiency can be a real clinical condition that warrants recognition and management, particularly in high-risk groups. The optimal vitamin D level is likely more than or equal to 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL). The established consequences of vitamin D deficiency in adults include osteomalacia and osteoporosis. Moreover, whether vitamin D supplementation reduces falls and fractures in subjects with baseline vitamin D more than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) is not confirmed. However, vitamin D supplementation is still needed for patients with osteoporosis and those at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. Finally, there is no justification for measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the general population. Conclusions:  For patients at increased risk for osteoporosis, those with vitamin D deficiency, or both, it remains reasonable to consider vitamin D supplementation (800–1,000 IU/d or more), consistent with recommendations of multiple societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:这篇简明的文章旨在(a)回顾维生素D在骨骼健康中的作用,(b)讨论维生素D缺乏的后果,(c)分析维生素D在预防和治疗骨质疏松症中的应用,以及(D)探索证据是否正倒转到维生素D的有益作用上。材料和方法:对文献进行叙述性的非系统回顾,以回答上述目标中提出的问题。结果:一项文献综述表明,维生素D缺乏症可能是一种真正的临床状况,值得认识和管理,特别是在高危人群中。最佳维生素D水平可能大于或等于50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL)。成年人缺乏维生素D的后果包括骨软化症和骨质疏松症。此外,在基线维生素D超过50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL)的受试者中,补充维生素D是否能减少跌倒和骨折尚未得到证实。然而,骨质疏松症患者和维生素D缺乏风险增加的患者仍然需要补充维生素D。最后,没有理由在普通人群中测量25-羟基维生素D。结论:对于骨质疏松症风险增加的患者,维生素D缺乏症患者,或两者兼而有之的患者,考虑补充维生素D (800-1,000 IU/ D或更多)仍然是合理的,与多个学会的建议一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vitamin D and Bone Health 2022: Is the Evidence Pendulum Switching Backward on Its Benefits?
Abstract Objectives:  This concise article aims to (a) review the role of vitamin D in bone health, (b) discuss the consequences of vitamin D deficiency, (c) analyze the use of vitamin D to prevent and treat osteoporosis and (d) explore if the evidence pendulum is switching back on the beneficial effects of vitamin D. Materials and Methods:  A narrative nonsystematic review of the literature was done thematically to answer the questions stated in the objectives above. Results:  A literature review suggests that vitamin D deficiency can be a real clinical condition that warrants recognition and management, particularly in high-risk groups. The optimal vitamin D level is likely more than or equal to 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL). The established consequences of vitamin D deficiency in adults include osteomalacia and osteoporosis. Moreover, whether vitamin D supplementation reduces falls and fractures in subjects with baseline vitamin D more than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) is not confirmed. However, vitamin D supplementation is still needed for patients with osteoporosis and those at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. Finally, there is no justification for measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the general population. Conclusions:  For patients at increased risk for osteoporosis, those with vitamin D deficiency, or both, it remains reasonable to consider vitamin D supplementation (800–1,000 IU/d or more), consistent with recommendations of multiple societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safely Withdrawing Glucocorticoid Therapy: A Case-Based Approach Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Cardiac Markers in Diabetes Diabetes, Kidneys, Heart, and Ramadan The Fifth United Arab Emirates Obesity Conference, November 4–5, 2023, Abu Dhabi, UAE The Gulf Association of Endocrinology and Diabetes in 2023: A Message from the President and Officers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1