人工器官设计:走向学科整合

G. Catapano
{"title":"人工器官设计:走向学科整合","authors":"G. Catapano","doi":"10.1109/MECBME.2011.5752096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the evolution of design methods is briefly analyzed and discussed with reference to artificial organs intended to substitute for metabolic bodily functions. In the last seventy years, the methods of artificial organ design have evolved towards a more systematic approach that more and more accounts for biological issues (man-machine interfaces, biocompatibility issues, etc.) to the point that at the forefront of research the design paradigm is shifting from fully synthetic mechanical/electronic prostheses towards the development in vitro of tissue engineered replacement organs/tissues, where the artificial part is fully integrated with the biological counterpart. To keep up with this complex scenario, design methods have shifted: from an experiments-based to the methodical approach; from one to multiple objective functions; from focusing on one single process to multiple concurring processes, often differing in time and space scale; from seeking solutions consisting of one device to many coupled devices; from seeking a generic solution for all patients' needs to seeking personalized solutions for each patient, so that the patient should not adapt to an existing device or implant, but it is the device or implant that has to adapt to the patients' specific needs and circumstances. The impact of this evolution in design on the way courses in biomedical engineering are organized and taught in Europe is also briefly analyzed and discussed.","PeriodicalId":348448,"journal":{"name":"2011 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial organs design: Towards the integration of disciplines\",\"authors\":\"G. Catapano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MECBME.2011.5752096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the evolution of design methods is briefly analyzed and discussed with reference to artificial organs intended to substitute for metabolic bodily functions. In the last seventy years, the methods of artificial organ design have evolved towards a more systematic approach that more and more accounts for biological issues (man-machine interfaces, biocompatibility issues, etc.) to the point that at the forefront of research the design paradigm is shifting from fully synthetic mechanical/electronic prostheses towards the development in vitro of tissue engineered replacement organs/tissues, where the artificial part is fully integrated with the biological counterpart. To keep up with this complex scenario, design methods have shifted: from an experiments-based to the methodical approach; from one to multiple objective functions; from focusing on one single process to multiple concurring processes, often differing in time and space scale; from seeking solutions consisting of one device to many coupled devices; from seeking a generic solution for all patients' needs to seeking personalized solutions for each patient, so that the patient should not adapt to an existing device or implant, but it is the device or implant that has to adapt to the patients' specific needs and circumstances. The impact of this evolution in design on the way courses in biomedical engineering are organized and taught in Europe is also briefly analyzed and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MECBME.2011.5752096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MECBME.2011.5752096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文就人体代谢性功能的人造器官的设计方法的演变作一简要的分析和讨论。在过去的七十年里,人工器官设计的方法已经发展到一个更加系统化的方法,越来越多地考虑到生物问题(人机界面,生物相容性问题等),以至于在研究的前沿,设计范式正在从完全合成的机械/电子假体转向体外组织工程替代器官/组织的发展。人工部分与生物部分完全结合。为了跟上这种复杂的情况,设计方法已经发生了转变:从基于实验的方法到系统的方法;从一个目标函数到多个目标函数;从关注单一进程到多个并发进程,往往在时间和空间尺度上有所不同;从寻求由一个器件组成的解决方案到寻求多个耦合器件;从寻求针对所有患者需求的通用解决方案到为每个患者寻求个性化解决方案,这样患者就不应该适应现有的设备或植入物,而是设备或植入物必须适应患者的特定需求和情况。设计的这种演变对欧洲生物医学工程课程的组织和教学方式的影响也进行了简要的分析和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial organs design: Towards the integration of disciplines
In this paper, the evolution of design methods is briefly analyzed and discussed with reference to artificial organs intended to substitute for metabolic bodily functions. In the last seventy years, the methods of artificial organ design have evolved towards a more systematic approach that more and more accounts for biological issues (man-machine interfaces, biocompatibility issues, etc.) to the point that at the forefront of research the design paradigm is shifting from fully synthetic mechanical/electronic prostheses towards the development in vitro of tissue engineered replacement organs/tissues, where the artificial part is fully integrated with the biological counterpart. To keep up with this complex scenario, design methods have shifted: from an experiments-based to the methodical approach; from one to multiple objective functions; from focusing on one single process to multiple concurring processes, often differing in time and space scale; from seeking solutions consisting of one device to many coupled devices; from seeking a generic solution for all patients' needs to seeking personalized solutions for each patient, so that the patient should not adapt to an existing device or implant, but it is the device or implant that has to adapt to the patients' specific needs and circumstances. The impact of this evolution in design on the way courses in biomedical engineering are organized and taught in Europe is also briefly analyzed and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise reduction in echocardigraphy images using Contourlet transform A philosophical perspective on studies of human movement Finding protein active sites using approximate sub-graph isomorphism A novel graduate program in biomedical engineering at King Abdulaziz University to meet the local needs Blind assistant navigation system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1