{"title":"Reggio Emilia","authors":"Masao Nishikawa","doi":"10.1017/S0097852300014532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"agrarian elites from the parliamentary Republic, but does not allow one to fit responsibility for the Republic's demise and the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship into any of the simplified theories of the far right or far left which still circulate today. Although several German industrialists supported Hitler before January 1933, German big business, in general, divided its financial gifts between the Deutsche Volkspartei and the Deutschnationale Volkspartei, and gave much less to Hitler because it feared socialist experiments from a Nazi regime. East Elbian Junkers stirred up the opposition of small holders to the Republic because it had failed to provide them with security in a world swimming in surplus agricultural production. The East Elbian agrarians were, however, too weakened financially and politically to exercise decisive influence in a heavily industrialized society. The Social Democratic Party lost some of its popularity among workers by \"tolerating\" Bruning's emergency decrees, but its biggest mistake was that it did not have a real alternative to the stringent social and economic measures which Bruning applied by means of these decrees. Germany's craftsmen, shopkeepers and their white-collar employees were early supporters of Hitler, and, in combination with small farmers, were the largest and most enthusaistic block in the Nazi electorate. The specialized topics and esoteric discussions that were covered during the symposium held at Bochum evoked a surprising amount of public interest. A thirty-minute program on regional television dealt with the symposium two days after its conclusion. A one-hour radio program on August 20 explored some of the results of the conference. —Robert A. Gates Ohio State University","PeriodicalId":363865,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300014532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

但不允许任何人将共和国的灭亡和纳粹独裁政权的建立的责任归结为任何简化的极右或极左理论,这些理论至今仍在流传。尽管在1933年1月之前,有几位德国实业家支持希特勒,但德国大企业总体上将其财政捐赠分配给了德意志人民党和德意志国家党,而给希特勒的捐赠要少得多,因为它们担心纳粹政权会进行社会主义实验。东埃尔比亚的容克激起了小农对共和国的反对,因为在一个充斥着过剩农业生产的世界里,共和国未能为他们提供安全保障。然而,东埃尔比亚的农民在经济和政治上都被削弱了,无法在一个高度工业化的社会中发挥决定性的影响。由于“容忍”布吕宁的紧急法令,社会民主党在工人中失去了一些声望,但它最大的错误是,除了布吕宁通过这些法令实施的严厉的社会和经济措施之外,它没有真正的选择。德国的工匠、店主和他们的白领员工是希特勒的早期支持者,再加上小农,他们是纳粹选民中最大、最热情的群体。在波鸿举行的专题讨论会期间所涉及的专业话题和深奥的讨论引起了令人惊讶的公众兴趣。专题讨论会结束两天后,区域电视台播出了一个30分钟的节目。8月20日,一个一小时的广播节目探讨了会议的一些成果。——罗伯特·a·盖茨俄亥俄州立大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reggio Emilia
agrarian elites from the parliamentary Republic, but does not allow one to fit responsibility for the Republic's demise and the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship into any of the simplified theories of the far right or far left which still circulate today. Although several German industrialists supported Hitler before January 1933, German big business, in general, divided its financial gifts between the Deutsche Volkspartei and the Deutschnationale Volkspartei, and gave much less to Hitler because it feared socialist experiments from a Nazi regime. East Elbian Junkers stirred up the opposition of small holders to the Republic because it had failed to provide them with security in a world swimming in surplus agricultural production. The East Elbian agrarians were, however, too weakened financially and politically to exercise decisive influence in a heavily industrialized society. The Social Democratic Party lost some of its popularity among workers by "tolerating" Bruning's emergency decrees, but its biggest mistake was that it did not have a real alternative to the stringent social and economic measures which Bruning applied by means of these decrees. Germany's craftsmen, shopkeepers and their white-collar employees were early supporters of Hitler, and, in combination with small farmers, were the largest and most enthusaistic block in the Nazi electorate. The specialized topics and esoteric discussions that were covered during the symposium held at Bochum evoked a surprising amount of public interest. A thirty-minute program on regional television dealt with the symposium two days after its conclusion. A one-hour radio program on August 20 explored some of the results of the conference. —Robert A. Gates Ohio State University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader John H. M. Laslett and Seymour Martin Upset, eds., Failure of a Dream ? Essays in the History of American Socialism (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1974) Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader Revolutionary and Counter-Revolutionary Thought in Habsburg Hungary, 1914–1918 International Approaches to the Study of Labor History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1