设计水平状态

P. Viganó, Tommaso Pietropolli
{"title":"设计水平状态","authors":"P. Viganó, Tommaso Pietropolli","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.1981013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is divided into three parts. The first introduces a trilogy of concepts and figures of the discourse. The concept of isotropy, as opposed to hierarchy, evokes the same conditions in all directions. The concept of porosity tackles the fluidity and malleability of space, the passage of bodies through other bodies. The concept of horizontality, in turn, explores the possibility of different types of spatial order. The trilogy presents a critical approach and a discourse on the possibility of a project which, in relation to the current urbanisation process and current debate, can be considered a counter project. The second part concentrates on horizontality, investigating its constructive role in the organisation of spatial thought. As opposed to the vertical/hierarchical organisation of space, horizontal and acentred structures enable the dissolution of the centre/periphery dichotomy, while addressing questions of inter-species spatial equity and individual/ collective emancipation. The third part of the paper introduces a series of actual cases of territorial design where the idea of horizontality, against the background of the entire conceptual trilogy, was operational. Here space is considered not as a neutral connector, but as a support and an agent of horizontality. The order of the three parts must not be misunderstood. It does not refer to a research sequence where first comes theoretical thinking, then this is embedded into a tradition to legitimate it and finally applied to case studies. Our discourse is produced through the interpretation, projections and design of concrete situations. It is from the constant exchange among the three different levels that the figures have arisen. This inversion is always to be considered when reading the following text, the order of which is only instrumental in a better explanation of the discourse itself.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Horizontality\",\"authors\":\"P. Viganó, Tommaso Pietropolli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02513625.2021.1981013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper is divided into three parts. The first introduces a trilogy of concepts and figures of the discourse. The concept of isotropy, as opposed to hierarchy, evokes the same conditions in all directions. The concept of porosity tackles the fluidity and malleability of space, the passage of bodies through other bodies. The concept of horizontality, in turn, explores the possibility of different types of spatial order. The trilogy presents a critical approach and a discourse on the possibility of a project which, in relation to the current urbanisation process and current debate, can be considered a counter project. The second part concentrates on horizontality, investigating its constructive role in the organisation of spatial thought. As opposed to the vertical/hierarchical organisation of space, horizontal and acentred structures enable the dissolution of the centre/periphery dichotomy, while addressing questions of inter-species spatial equity and individual/ collective emancipation. The third part of the paper introduces a series of actual cases of territorial design where the idea of horizontality, against the background of the entire conceptual trilogy, was operational. Here space is considered not as a neutral connector, but as a support and an agent of horizontality. The order of the three parts must not be misunderstood. It does not refer to a research sequence where first comes theoretical thinking, then this is embedded into a tradition to legitimate it and finally applied to case studies. Our discourse is produced through the interpretation, projections and design of concrete situations. It is from the constant exchange among the three different levels that the figures have arisen. This inversion is always to be considered when reading the following text, the order of which is only instrumental in a better explanation of the discourse itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文共分为三个部分。第一部分介绍了三部曲的话语概念和形象。与层次结构相反,各向同性的概念唤起了所有方向上相同的条件。多孔性的概念处理了空间的流动性和延展性,以及物体穿过其他物体的通道。反过来,水平的概念探索了不同类型空间秩序的可能性。三部曲提出了一种批判性的方法,并讨论了一个项目的可能性,这个项目与当前的城市化进程和当前的辩论有关,可以被视为一个反项目。第二部分着重于横向性,考察其在空间思维组织中的建设性作用。与垂直/分层的空间组织相反,水平和中心结构能够消解中心/外围二分法,同时解决物种间空间公平和个人/集体解放的问题。论文的第三部分介绍了一系列地域设计的实际案例,在整个概念三部曲的背景下,横向的思想是可操作的。在这里,空间被认为不是一个中立的连接,而是作为水平的支撑和代理。这三部分的顺序不可误解。它并不是指一个研究顺序,即首先是理论思考,然后将其嵌入传统以使其合法化,最后应用于案例研究。我们的话语是通过对具体情境的解读、投射和设计而产生的。正是在这三个不同层次的不断交流中,才产生了这些数字。在阅读下面的文本时,这种倒置总是要考虑的,它的顺序只是有助于更好地解释话语本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Horizontality
Abstract This paper is divided into three parts. The first introduces a trilogy of concepts and figures of the discourse. The concept of isotropy, as opposed to hierarchy, evokes the same conditions in all directions. The concept of porosity tackles the fluidity and malleability of space, the passage of bodies through other bodies. The concept of horizontality, in turn, explores the possibility of different types of spatial order. The trilogy presents a critical approach and a discourse on the possibility of a project which, in relation to the current urbanisation process and current debate, can be considered a counter project. The second part concentrates on horizontality, investigating its constructive role in the organisation of spatial thought. As opposed to the vertical/hierarchical organisation of space, horizontal and acentred structures enable the dissolution of the centre/periphery dichotomy, while addressing questions of inter-species spatial equity and individual/ collective emancipation. The third part of the paper introduces a series of actual cases of territorial design where the idea of horizontality, against the background of the entire conceptual trilogy, was operational. Here space is considered not as a neutral connector, but as a support and an agent of horizontality. The order of the three parts must not be misunderstood. It does not refer to a research sequence where first comes theoretical thinking, then this is embedded into a tradition to legitimate it and finally applied to case studies. Our discourse is produced through the interpretation, projections and design of concrete situations. It is from the constant exchange among the three different levels that the figures have arisen. This inversion is always to be considered when reading the following text, the order of which is only instrumental in a better explanation of the discourse itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Karl Ganser. Integratives Planen und Handeln Leadership – collectively oriented: Insights from trajectories of temporary urbanism Die Bereitstellung von leistbarem Wohnraum in Zeiten der Wohnkrise Breaking out of the box – towards functional spatial planning Bucharest – the role of spatial planning in a challenging urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1