作为谜的教学:离题的角色

A. Rosie
{"title":"作为谜的教学:离题的角色","authors":"A. Rosie","doi":"10.11120/elss.2014.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ELiSS now publishes papers online when they are ready for publication and then organises them into a specific volume and issue number with accompanying editorial at a later point. This ensures accepted papers are published as soon as possible and also poses a novel issue for an editor, for she or he can hardly introduce papers already available and probably downloaded as if they are new to readers. Indeed, some of the papers in 6.1 have been available for some time, and rightly so. So what purpose can an editorial serve in this situation? Searching for links after the event where there is no overall theme is likely to prove unsuccessful. Perhaps the ‘editor as author’ might search for narratives within the field of higher education for a particular journal issue? In this editorial I consider validation and online course management requirements as texts forming a narrative to embed teaching and learning practices. We are pleased to publish six papers in this issue and particularly to introduce a commentary on a previous paper. Here Professor Judith Burnett, Pro Vice-Chancellor at Greenwich University, discusses the paper by Eric Harrison and Rob Mears on assessment in undergraduate sociology published last year in ELiSS 5.3 (Harrison & Mears 2013). The issue of assessment is an important one for all who work in higher education and social scientists have worked to develop lively assessments for students and to contribute to research and practice in assessment generally. Harrison and Mears showed that undergraduate students did not necessarily view assessment in positive terms and so their paper questioned how much progress has been made since the fund for development of teaching and learning (FDTL) study in 2001. Burnett takes this question forward and provides a lens through which many academics in the social sciences can continue to contribute reports on their pedagogic practice, research reports to ELiSS and other journals devoted to promoting learning and teaching in the social sciences.","PeriodicalId":147930,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","volume":"18 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching as Enigma: A Role for Digression\",\"authors\":\"A. Rosie\",\"doi\":\"10.11120/elss.2014.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ELiSS now publishes papers online when they are ready for publication and then organises them into a specific volume and issue number with accompanying editorial at a later point. This ensures accepted papers are published as soon as possible and also poses a novel issue for an editor, for she or he can hardly introduce papers already available and probably downloaded as if they are new to readers. Indeed, some of the papers in 6.1 have been available for some time, and rightly so. So what purpose can an editorial serve in this situation? Searching for links after the event where there is no overall theme is likely to prove unsuccessful. Perhaps the ‘editor as author’ might search for narratives within the field of higher education for a particular journal issue? In this editorial I consider validation and online course management requirements as texts forming a narrative to embed teaching and learning practices. We are pleased to publish six papers in this issue and particularly to introduce a commentary on a previous paper. Here Professor Judith Burnett, Pro Vice-Chancellor at Greenwich University, discusses the paper by Eric Harrison and Rob Mears on assessment in undergraduate sociology published last year in ELiSS 5.3 (Harrison & Mears 2013). The issue of assessment is an important one for all who work in higher education and social scientists have worked to develop lively assessments for students and to contribute to research and practice in assessment generally. Harrison and Mears showed that undergraduate students did not necessarily view assessment in positive terms and so their paper questioned how much progress has been made since the fund for development of teaching and learning (FDTL) study in 2001. Burnett takes this question forward and provides a lens through which many academics in the social sciences can continue to contribute reports on their pedagogic practice, research reports to ELiSS and other journals devoted to promoting learning and teaching in the social sciences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 26\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ELiSS现在在论文准备发表时在线发布论文,然后在稍后将它们组织成特定的卷和刊号,并附带社论。这确保了被接受的论文能够尽快发表,同时也给编辑提出了一个新问题,因为她或他很难像介绍新论文一样介绍已有的论文和可能下载的论文。的确,6.1中的一些文件已经提供了一段时间,这是正确的。那么,在这种情况下,社论能起到什么作用呢?在没有整体主题的活动之后搜索链接很可能被证明是不成功的。也许“作为作者的编辑”可能会为某一期刊寻找高等教育领域的叙述?在这篇社论中,我将验证和在线课程管理要求视为文本,形成了嵌入教学实践的叙述。我们很高兴在这一期上发表六篇论文,并特别介绍对前一篇论文的评论。这里,格林威治大学副校长Judith Burnett教授讨论了Eric Harrison和Rob Mears去年在ELiSS 5.3 (Harrison & Mears 2013)上发表的关于本科生社会学评估的论文。评估问题对所有从事高等教育工作的人来说都是一个重要的问题,社会科学家一直致力于为学生制定生动的评估,并为评估的研究和实践做出贡献。Harrison和Mears表明,本科生并不一定以积极的态度看待评估,因此他们的论文质疑自2001年教与学发展基金(FDTL)研究以来取得了多大进展。伯内特将这个问题向前推进,并为许多社会科学学者提供了一个视角,通过这个视角,他们可以继续为ELiSS和其他致力于促进社会科学学习和教学的期刊贡献他们的教学实践报告、研究报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching as Enigma: A Role for Digression
ELiSS now publishes papers online when they are ready for publication and then organises them into a specific volume and issue number with accompanying editorial at a later point. This ensures accepted papers are published as soon as possible and also poses a novel issue for an editor, for she or he can hardly introduce papers already available and probably downloaded as if they are new to readers. Indeed, some of the papers in 6.1 have been available for some time, and rightly so. So what purpose can an editorial serve in this situation? Searching for links after the event where there is no overall theme is likely to prove unsuccessful. Perhaps the ‘editor as author’ might search for narratives within the field of higher education for a particular journal issue? In this editorial I consider validation and online course management requirements as texts forming a narrative to embed teaching and learning practices. We are pleased to publish six papers in this issue and particularly to introduce a commentary on a previous paper. Here Professor Judith Burnett, Pro Vice-Chancellor at Greenwich University, discusses the paper by Eric Harrison and Rob Mears on assessment in undergraduate sociology published last year in ELiSS 5.3 (Harrison & Mears 2013). The issue of assessment is an important one for all who work in higher education and social scientists have worked to develop lively assessments for students and to contribute to research and practice in assessment generally. Harrison and Mears showed that undergraduate students did not necessarily view assessment in positive terms and so their paper questioned how much progress has been made since the fund for development of teaching and learning (FDTL) study in 2001. Burnett takes this question forward and provides a lens through which many academics in the social sciences can continue to contribute reports on their pedagogic practice, research reports to ELiSS and other journals devoted to promoting learning and teaching in the social sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact of an Industry-Centred Activity on Student Learning Making it Work: Widening Participation in Higher Education for Adults in Employment Transforming Pedagogy and Experience through e-Learning in Teacher Education Introducing the Complete Case Study into an Australian Undergraduate Sociology Major ‘A Picture Is Worth 10,000 Words’: A Module to Test the ‘Visualization Hypothesis’ in Quantitative Methods Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1