{"title":"真蒂利的政治理论和法理学:从维多利亚到格劳秀斯的“神学”和“人文主义”观点之间的大辩论","authors":"D. Panizza","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.871754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.","PeriodicalId":431450,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli: The Great Debate between 'Theological' and 'Humanist' Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius\",\"authors\":\"D. Panizza\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.871754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli: The Great Debate between 'Theological' and 'Humanist' Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius
Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.