有理由的选择题

Anusha Hegde, Nayanika Ghosh, Viraj Kumar
{"title":"有理由的选择题","authors":"Anusha Hegde, Nayanika Ghosh, Viraj Kumar","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2014.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are widely used as an efficient means to grade large batches of students. With technology enabling extremely large classes (MOOCs), the use of MCQs has increased rapidly, leading to an increased scrutiny of their pedagogical utility. In this paper, we present a variant of MCQs that requires students to justify their answer by choosing one or more supporting statements from an instructor-defined list. Thus we retain the ability to automate the grading process, while addressing some (but not all) of the known weaknesses of such assessment. To help the educational research community evaluate the pedagogical utility of this approach, we have created an open-source plug in for creating and evaluating such questions on a widely used e-learning platform (Moodle).","PeriodicalId":151911,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Choice Questions with Justifications\",\"authors\":\"Anusha Hegde, Nayanika Ghosh, Viraj Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T4E.2014.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are widely used as an efficient means to grade large batches of students. With technology enabling extremely large classes (MOOCs), the use of MCQs has increased rapidly, leading to an increased scrutiny of their pedagogical utility. In this paper, we present a variant of MCQs that requires students to justify their answer by choosing one or more supporting statements from an instructor-defined list. Thus we retain the ability to automate the grading process, while addressing some (but not all) of the known weaknesses of such assessment. To help the educational research community evaluate the pedagogical utility of this approach, we have created an open-source plug in for creating and evaluating such questions on a widely used e-learning platform (Moodle).\",\"PeriodicalId\":151911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2014.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2014.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多项选择题(mcq)作为一种对大量学生进行评分的有效手段被广泛使用。随着技术的发展,极大的班级(mooc), mcq的使用迅速增加,导致对其教学效用的审查越来越多。在本文中,我们提出了mcq的一种变体,要求学生通过从教师定义的列表中选择一个或多个支持陈述来证明他们的答案。因此,我们保留了自动化分级过程的能力,同时解决了这种评估的一些(但不是全部)已知弱点。为了帮助教育研究界评估这种方法的教学效用,我们创建了一个开源插件,用于在广泛使用的电子学习平台(Moodle)上创建和评估此类问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiple Choice Questions with Justifications
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are widely used as an efficient means to grade large batches of students. With technology enabling extremely large classes (MOOCs), the use of MCQs has increased rapidly, leading to an increased scrutiny of their pedagogical utility. In this paper, we present a variant of MCQs that requires students to justify their answer by choosing one or more supporting statements from an instructor-defined list. Thus we retain the ability to automate the grading process, while addressing some (but not all) of the known weaknesses of such assessment. To help the educational research community evaluate the pedagogical utility of this approach, we have created an open-source plug in for creating and evaluating such questions on a widely used e-learning platform (Moodle).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Any Time Virtual Labs: On Portable Media and as Debian Packages Fair and Non-repudiable Protocol for Exchange of E-examination Question Paper and Answer-Scripts NaVaSH: Examination Software for ICT Based Institutions A Self Study Learning Environment for Modeling Abilities: Do All Learners Take the Same Learning Path? Beyond interfaces: Understanding the Process of Designing Grassroots technologies, to Develop Sustainability Case Studies for Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1