{"title":"低功率摆式波能转换器的最优MPPT策略","authors":"M. Carandell, D. Toma, J. Río, M. Gasulla","doi":"10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.","PeriodicalId":338240,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Sensors","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimum MPPT Strategy for Low-Power Pendulum-Type Wave Energy Converters\",\"authors\":\"M. Carandell, D. Toma, J. Río, M. Gasulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Sensors\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimum MPPT Strategy for Low-Power Pendulum-Type Wave Energy Converters
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.