反问:谷歌不能为教育提供什么

Herlina Suksmawati, Praja Firdaus Nuryananda
{"title":"反问:谷歌不能为教育提供什么","authors":"Herlina Suksmawati, Praja Firdaus Nuryananda","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200325.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". We believe that education nowadays has been conducted differently both sides, for the subject and the object. The term “education” has been inherently related to moral obligation in studying and implicitly looking for answers to theoretical and practical problems in life. Meanwhile, current education has integrated to Internet of Things (IoT), and subsequently confirming the existence of Manuel Castells’ “network society”. This informational society thus undermines the epistemological mechanism in education. The word “googling”, refers to searching with Google, has been so popular in education nowadays because Google often gives us answers to theoretical and practical problems in life, answers that should have been provided by education. Hence it becomes a valid common sense to think that Google almost provide us with all information they had inside the online network. Whilst technology always associated with double-edged sword to humanity, the use of Google has made younger generation become fragile in foundational thinking, as Rhenald Kasali called them “Strawberry Generation”. But as Google gives society with abundant information, yet Google fails to deepen society knowledge and understanding things. Therefore, our hypothesis is what Google has failed to provide the society is rhetorical questions. With the internet, everyone could make their own fabricated “truth”, but ironically people sometimes fail to understand the knowledge itself. This paper propose the idea of “rhetorical question” that vital in knowledge, has failed to be provided by internet. In sum, “rhetorical question” would be a good instrument to counter “Google mechanism” to make education better.","PeriodicalId":377153,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019)","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rhetorical Questions: What Google Couldn’t Provide for Education\",\"authors\":\"Herlina Suksmawati, Praja Firdaus Nuryananda\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.200325.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". We believe that education nowadays has been conducted differently both sides, for the subject and the object. The term “education” has been inherently related to moral obligation in studying and implicitly looking for answers to theoretical and practical problems in life. Meanwhile, current education has integrated to Internet of Things (IoT), and subsequently confirming the existence of Manuel Castells’ “network society”. This informational society thus undermines the epistemological mechanism in education. The word “googling”, refers to searching with Google, has been so popular in education nowadays because Google often gives us answers to theoretical and practical problems in life, answers that should have been provided by education. Hence it becomes a valid common sense to think that Google almost provide us with all information they had inside the online network. Whilst technology always associated with double-edged sword to humanity, the use of Google has made younger generation become fragile in foundational thinking, as Rhenald Kasali called them “Strawberry Generation”. But as Google gives society with abundant information, yet Google fails to deepen society knowledge and understanding things. Therefore, our hypothesis is what Google has failed to provide the society is rhetorical questions. With the internet, everyone could make their own fabricated “truth”, but ironically people sometimes fail to understand the knowledge itself. This paper propose the idea of “rhetorical question” that vital in knowledge, has failed to be provided by internet. In sum, “rhetorical question” would be a good instrument to counter “Google mechanism” to make education better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019)\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200325.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200325.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 我们认为,现在的教育在主客体两方面都有所不同。“教育”一词本质上与学习和含蓄地寻找生活中理论和实践问题的答案的道德义务有关。同时,当今的教育已经与物联网(IoT)融合,从而证实了Manuel Castells所说的“网络社会”的存在。因此,这个信息社会破坏了教育的认识论机制。“Google”这个词,指的是用谷歌搜索,如今在教育领域非常流行,因为谷歌经常为我们提供生活中理论和实践问题的答案,这些答案本应由教育提供。因此,认为谷歌几乎为我们提供了他们在在线网络中的所有信息,这成为一个有效的常识。虽然科技对人类来说总是一把双刃剑,但谷歌的使用使年轻一代在基本思维上变得脆弱,正如罗纳德·卡萨里所说的“草莓一代”。但是,虽然谷歌给社会提供了丰富的信息,但谷歌并没有加深社会对事物的认识和理解。因此,我们的假设是谷歌未能向社会提供的是反问句。有了互联网,每个人都可以编造自己的“真相”,但讽刺的是,人们有时无法理解知识本身。本文提出了在知识中至关重要的“反问句”的概念,这一概念未能被互联网所提供。总而言之,“反问句”将是对抗“谷歌机制”的一个很好的工具,可以让教育变得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rhetorical Questions: What Google Couldn’t Provide for Education
. We believe that education nowadays has been conducted differently both sides, for the subject and the object. The term “education” has been inherently related to moral obligation in studying and implicitly looking for answers to theoretical and practical problems in life. Meanwhile, current education has integrated to Internet of Things (IoT), and subsequently confirming the existence of Manuel Castells’ “network society”. This informational society thus undermines the epistemological mechanism in education. The word “googling”, refers to searching with Google, has been so popular in education nowadays because Google often gives us answers to theoretical and practical problems in life, answers that should have been provided by education. Hence it becomes a valid common sense to think that Google almost provide us with all information they had inside the online network. Whilst technology always associated with double-edged sword to humanity, the use of Google has made younger generation become fragile in foundational thinking, as Rhenald Kasali called them “Strawberry Generation”. But as Google gives society with abundant information, yet Google fails to deepen society knowledge and understanding things. Therefore, our hypothesis is what Google has failed to provide the society is rhetorical questions. With the internet, everyone could make their own fabricated “truth”, but ironically people sometimes fail to understand the knowledge itself. This paper propose the idea of “rhetorical question” that vital in knowledge, has failed to be provided by internet. In sum, “rhetorical question” would be a good instrument to counter “Google mechanism” to make education better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CSR Communication Model in Facing Industry Revolution 4.0 The Dynamics of Development Communication (A Case Study: Community-Based Participatory Development Program (P3BK) Government of Bekasi City) Improve Creative Industry Competitiveness Penta Helix and Human Capital in Digital Era Mediated Interpersonal Communication: A New Way of Social Interaction in the Digital Age The Effectiveness of Tropicana Slim Advertising on Television (Quantitative Descriptive Study of the Effectiveness of the Advertisement of Dion Wiyoko on Television in the Society of Surabaya)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1