对外部门统计的光滑自举方法

K. AchaChigozie, A. AchaIkechukwu
{"title":"对外部门统计的光滑自举方法","authors":"K. AchaChigozie, A. AchaIkechukwu","doi":"10.12691/IJEFM-3-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The investigation of the possibility of a significant difference existing in the parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods on external sector statistics, and establishing the sample data distribution using the smooth bootstrap is the focus of this study. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the kernel density will be used on the test statistic θ in the determination of such difference. Establishing this difference will lead to more detailed study to discover reasons for such difference. This will also aid the Nigeria economy to aim at improving the performance of the external sector statistics (ESS). The study used secondary data from Central bank of Nigeria (1983-2012). Analysis was carried out using R-statistical package. In the course of the analysis, 17280 scenarios were replicated 200 times. The result shows a significant difference between the performances of the parametric and nonparametric smooth bootstrap methods, namely; wild and pairwise bootstrap respectively. The significantly better performance of the wild bootstrap indicate the possible use of this technique in assessment of comparative performance of ESS with a view to further understanding the better performers in order to identify factors contributing to such better performance. Also, when the sample size and the bootstrap level are very high, the smooth bootstrap or kernel density estimates outperform the pair wise bootstrap notwithstanding that they are nonparametric methods. The kernel density plots revealed that the sampling distribution of the ESS was found to be a Chi-square distribution and was confirmed by the smooth bootstrap methods.","PeriodicalId":298738,"journal":{"name":"international journal of research in computer application & management","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smooth Bootstrap Methods on External Sector Statistics\",\"authors\":\"K. AchaChigozie, A. AchaIkechukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/IJEFM-3-3-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The investigation of the possibility of a significant difference existing in the parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods on external sector statistics, and establishing the sample data distribution using the smooth bootstrap is the focus of this study. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the kernel density will be used on the test statistic θ in the determination of such difference. Establishing this difference will lead to more detailed study to discover reasons for such difference. This will also aid the Nigeria economy to aim at improving the performance of the external sector statistics (ESS). The study used secondary data from Central bank of Nigeria (1983-2012). Analysis was carried out using R-statistical package. In the course of the analysis, 17280 scenarios were replicated 200 times. The result shows a significant difference between the performances of the parametric and nonparametric smooth bootstrap methods, namely; wild and pairwise bootstrap respectively. The significantly better performance of the wild bootstrap indicate the possible use of this technique in assessment of comparative performance of ESS with a view to further understanding the better performers in order to identify factors contributing to such better performance. Also, when the sample size and the bootstrap level are very high, the smooth bootstrap or kernel density estimates outperform the pair wise bootstrap notwithstanding that they are nonparametric methods. The kernel density plots revealed that the sampling distribution of the ESS was found to be a Chi-square distribution and was confirmed by the smooth bootstrap methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"international journal of research in computer application & management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"international journal of research in computer application & management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJEFM-3-3-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international journal of research in computer application & management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJEFM-3-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的重点是探讨参数和非参数自举方法在对外部门统计中存在显著差异的可能性,并利用光滑自举方法建立样本数据分布。在确定这种差异时,将在检验统计量θ上使用均方根误差(RMSE)和核密度。建立这种差异将导致更详细的研究,以发现这种差异的原因。这也将有助于尼日利亚经济以改善对外部门统计的业绩为目标。本研究使用的二手数据来自尼日利亚中央银行(1983-2012)。采用r统计软件包进行分析。在分析过程中,17280个场景被复制了200次。结果表明,参数光滑自举方法与非参数光滑自举方法的性能存在显著差异,即;野引导和成对引导分别。野生bootstrap的显著更好的性能表明,这种技术可能用于评估ESS的比较性能,以便进一步了解更好的性能,以确定促成这种更好性能的因素。此外,当样本量和自举水平非常高时,平滑自举或核密度估计优于成对自举,尽管它们是非参数方法。核密度图显示,ESS的抽样分布为卡方分布,并通过光滑自举方法得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smooth Bootstrap Methods on External Sector Statistics
The investigation of the possibility of a significant difference existing in the parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods on external sector statistics, and establishing the sample data distribution using the smooth bootstrap is the focus of this study. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the kernel density will be used on the test statistic θ in the determination of such difference. Establishing this difference will lead to more detailed study to discover reasons for such difference. This will also aid the Nigeria economy to aim at improving the performance of the external sector statistics (ESS). The study used secondary data from Central bank of Nigeria (1983-2012). Analysis was carried out using R-statistical package. In the course of the analysis, 17280 scenarios were replicated 200 times. The result shows a significant difference between the performances of the parametric and nonparametric smooth bootstrap methods, namely; wild and pairwise bootstrap respectively. The significantly better performance of the wild bootstrap indicate the possible use of this technique in assessment of comparative performance of ESS with a view to further understanding the better performers in order to identify factors contributing to such better performance. Also, when the sample size and the bootstrap level are very high, the smooth bootstrap or kernel density estimates outperform the pair wise bootstrap notwithstanding that they are nonparametric methods. The kernel density plots revealed that the sampling distribution of the ESS was found to be a Chi-square distribution and was confirmed by the smooth bootstrap methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nexus between Buyback, Business Cycle, and Stock Market Volatility Cascade Artificial Neural Networks for Modeling Economic Performance: A New Perspective Measuring the Efficiency of Hospital’s Cardiology Wards Using the Free Disposal Hull Approach World Oil Fluctuation and Vietnamese Stock Market Index Political Risk Factors on Perfomance of Public Private Partnership Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of Geothermal Renewable Enrgy Projects in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1