审计师转换和初始审计程序:一个案例研究

Erly Satya Graha Putri, R. Tobing
{"title":"审计师转换和初始审计程序:一个案例研究","authors":"Erly Satya Graha Putri, R. Tobing","doi":"10.2991/aprish-18.2019.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the reasons behind auditor or accounting firm switching and studies initial audit procedures. Auditors need to analyze the real reason behind auditor switching in order to make an appropriate decision during the client acceptance stage (an auditee’s willingness to share the real reason for auditor switching is questionable). Broadly speaking, there are two types of auditor switching: mandatory and voluntary. Our finding shows that the main driver of voluntary auditor switching for the specific firm studied in this case (referred to with the alias “Superannuation 12”) was to improve audit quality. A first-year audit will most likely have a higher risk than a recurring audit so auditors need to add several extended audit procedures as safeguards. These extended audit procedures should be properly implemented in all of the audit stages, except reporting stage. Therefore, the audit period for an initial audit is longer than for a recurring audit. The auditing firm involved in this case (referred to as “AP 111”) had some problems when performing initial audit procedures, which led the author to several suggestions for how this could be addressed authorities and the accounting firm itself. Keywords—accounting firm switching; auditor switching; communication with previous auditor; first-year audit; initial audit procedures.","PeriodicalId":111073,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditor Switching and Initial Audit Procedures: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Erly Satya Graha Putri, R. Tobing\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/aprish-18.2019.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the reasons behind auditor or accounting firm switching and studies initial audit procedures. Auditors need to analyze the real reason behind auditor switching in order to make an appropriate decision during the client acceptance stage (an auditee’s willingness to share the real reason for auditor switching is questionable). Broadly speaking, there are two types of auditor switching: mandatory and voluntary. Our finding shows that the main driver of voluntary auditor switching for the specific firm studied in this case (referred to with the alias “Superannuation 12”) was to improve audit quality. A first-year audit will most likely have a higher risk than a recurring audit so auditors need to add several extended audit procedures as safeguards. These extended audit procedures should be properly implemented in all of the audit stages, except reporting stage. Therefore, the audit period for an initial audit is longer than for a recurring audit. The auditing firm involved in this case (referred to as “AP 111”) had some problems when performing initial audit procedures, which led the author to several suggestions for how this could be addressed authorities and the accounting firm itself. Keywords—accounting firm switching; auditor switching; communication with previous auditor; first-year audit; initial audit procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/aprish-18.2019.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aprish-18.2019.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了审计师或会计师事务所转换的原因,并对初始审计程序进行了研究。审计师需要分析审计师转换背后的真正原因,以便在客户接受阶段做出适当的决定(被审计单位是否愿意分享审计师转换的真正原因是值得怀疑的)。一般来说,审计师转换有两种类型:强制性和自愿性。我们的研究结果表明,在本案例中所研究的特定公司(别名为“Superannuation 12”),自愿更换审计师的主要驱动因素是提高审计质量。第一年的审计很可能比定期审计有更高的风险,因此审计人员需要增加几个扩展的审计程序作为保障。这些扩展的审计程序应在除报告阶段外的所有审计阶段得到适当实施。因此,初始审计的审计周期比循环审计的审计周期长。涉及此案的审计公司(称为“AP 111”)在执行初始审计程序时遇到了一些问题,因此作者就如何解决当局和会计公司本身的问题提出了一些建议。关键词:会计师事务所转换;审计师切换;与前任审核员的沟通;一年级的审计;初始审计程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Auditor Switching and Initial Audit Procedures: A Case Study
This paper discusses the reasons behind auditor or accounting firm switching and studies initial audit procedures. Auditors need to analyze the real reason behind auditor switching in order to make an appropriate decision during the client acceptance stage (an auditee’s willingness to share the real reason for auditor switching is questionable). Broadly speaking, there are two types of auditor switching: mandatory and voluntary. Our finding shows that the main driver of voluntary auditor switching for the specific firm studied in this case (referred to with the alias “Superannuation 12”) was to improve audit quality. A first-year audit will most likely have a higher risk than a recurring audit so auditors need to add several extended audit procedures as safeguards. These extended audit procedures should be properly implemented in all of the audit stages, except reporting stage. Therefore, the audit period for an initial audit is longer than for a recurring audit. The auditing firm involved in this case (referred to as “AP 111”) had some problems when performing initial audit procedures, which led the author to several suggestions for how this could be addressed authorities and the accounting firm itself. Keywords—accounting firm switching; auditor switching; communication with previous auditor; first-year audit; initial audit procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Managerial Ability on Corporate Tax Avoidance Driving Mobile Game Engagement: Factors and User Metrics Analysis and Design of Internal Control on Barter Process in News Website Company Market Development Strategy For Pt A From The Side Of Capabilities And Potential Customers Evaluation of Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan Implementation in The Era of Technology Disruption: Case Study at University X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1