错误和坏的

Shaun Nichols
{"title":"错误和坏的","authors":"Shaun Nichols","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198869153.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental element of a cognitive account of moral judgment will be some form of representation. Two kinds of value representations need to be distinguished: value representations and rule representations. Value representations register valence for particular courses of action. For instance an organism might represent touching a certain wire as a bad thing. Such representations feed directly into behavior. Rule representations involve more than registering a bad value. They can involve complex representations composed of abstract concepts like impermissible, harm, and knowledge. This chapter argues that value representations cannot provide an adequate account of moral judgment, and that we must invoke rule representations to explain key features of moral judgment. In particular, it is difficult to capture the distinctive nature and specificity of wrongness judgments without adverting to structured rules.","PeriodicalId":383766,"journal":{"name":"Rational Rules","volume":"530 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Wrong and the Bad\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198869153.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental element of a cognitive account of moral judgment will be some form of representation. Two kinds of value representations need to be distinguished: value representations and rule representations. Value representations register valence for particular courses of action. For instance an organism might represent touching a certain wire as a bad thing. Such representations feed directly into behavior. Rule representations involve more than registering a bad value. They can involve complex representations composed of abstract concepts like impermissible, harm, and knowledge. This chapter argues that value representations cannot provide an adequate account of moral judgment, and that we must invoke rule representations to explain key features of moral judgment. In particular, it is difficult to capture the distinctive nature and specificity of wrongness judgments without adverting to structured rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rational Rules\",\"volume\":\"530 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rational Rules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198869153.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Rules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198869153.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德判断的认知解释的基本要素将是某种形式的表征。需要区分两种值表示:值表示和规则表示。价值表征记录了特定行为过程的效价。例如,一个有机体可能认为触摸某根电线是一件坏事。这样的表象直接影响到行为。规则表示涉及的不仅仅是注册一个坏值。它们可能涉及由抽象概念组成的复杂表征,如不允许、伤害和知识。本章认为,价值表征不能提供道德判断的充分说明,我们必须援引规则表征来解释道德判断的关键特征。特别是,如果不注意结构化规则,就很难捕捉错误判断的独特性质和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Wrong and the Bad
The fundamental element of a cognitive account of moral judgment will be some form of representation. Two kinds of value representations need to be distinguished: value representations and rule representations. Value representations register valence for particular courses of action. For instance an organism might represent touching a certain wire as a bad thing. Such representations feed directly into behavior. Rule representations involve more than registering a bad value. They can involve complex representations composed of abstract concepts like impermissible, harm, and knowledge. This chapter argues that value representations cannot provide an adequate account of moral judgment, and that we must invoke rule representations to explain key features of moral judgment. In particular, it is difficult to capture the distinctive nature and specificity of wrongness judgments without adverting to structured rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rationality and Morality Closure Scope Moral Empiricism Priors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1