最不发达国家的非法资金流动:1990-2008

D. Kar
{"title":"最不发达国家的非法资金流动:1990-2008","authors":"D. Kar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2335018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the scale and composition of illicit financial flows from the 48 Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Illicit financial flows involve the cross-border transfer of the proceeds of corruption, trade in contraband goods, criminal activities and tax evasion. In recent years, considerable interest has arisen over the extent to which such flows may have a detrimental impact on development and governance in both developed and developing countries alike.This issue has been recognized by the UN as important for development and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Illicit capital flight, where it occurs, is a major hindrance to the mobilization of domestic resources for development. In many cases, it significantly reduces the volume of resources available for investment in the MDGs and productive capacities. Through theUnited Nations, the international community has committed to strengthen national and multilateral efforts to address it. As the deadline for achievement of the MDGs draws closer, it is vital understand more about the nature of this problem and to explore possible policy solutions, especially for those countries furthest off-track towards the MDGs.The study’s indicative results find that illicit financial flows from the LDCs have increased from US $9.7 billion in 1990 to US $26.3 billion in 2008 implying an inflation-adjusted rate of increase of 6.2 percent per annum. Conservative (lower-bound) estimates indicate that illicit flows have increased from US $7.9 billion in 1990 to US $20.2 billion in 2008. The top ten exporters of illicit capital account for 63 percent of total outflows from the LDCs while the top 20 account for nearly 83 percent. Trade mispricing accounts for the bulk (65-70 percent) of illicit outflows from the LDCs, and the propensity for mispricing has increased along with increasing external trade. Empirical research on illicit flows indicates that there are three types of factors driving illicit flows — macroeconomic, structural, and governance-related.The ratio of illicit outflows to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) averages about 4.8 percent but there is wide variation among LDCs. Of the top 10 countries with the highest illicit flows to GDP ratio, four are small island countries, two are landlocked, and four are neither. In some LDCs, losses through illicit capital flows outpace monies received in official development assistance (ODA).","PeriodicalId":326708,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)","volume":"73 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illicit Financial Flows from the Least Developed Countries: 1990-2008\",\"authors\":\"D. Kar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2335018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the scale and composition of illicit financial flows from the 48 Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Illicit financial flows involve the cross-border transfer of the proceeds of corruption, trade in contraband goods, criminal activities and tax evasion. In recent years, considerable interest has arisen over the extent to which such flows may have a detrimental impact on development and governance in both developed and developing countries alike.This issue has been recognized by the UN as important for development and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Illicit capital flight, where it occurs, is a major hindrance to the mobilization of domestic resources for development. In many cases, it significantly reduces the volume of resources available for investment in the MDGs and productive capacities. Through theUnited Nations, the international community has committed to strengthen national and multilateral efforts to address it. As the deadline for achievement of the MDGs draws closer, it is vital understand more about the nature of this problem and to explore possible policy solutions, especially for those countries furthest off-track towards the MDGs.The study’s indicative results find that illicit financial flows from the LDCs have increased from US $9.7 billion in 1990 to US $26.3 billion in 2008 implying an inflation-adjusted rate of increase of 6.2 percent per annum. Conservative (lower-bound) estimates indicate that illicit flows have increased from US $7.9 billion in 1990 to US $20.2 billion in 2008. The top ten exporters of illicit capital account for 63 percent of total outflows from the LDCs while the top 20 account for nearly 83 percent. Trade mispricing accounts for the bulk (65-70 percent) of illicit outflows from the LDCs, and the propensity for mispricing has increased along with increasing external trade. Empirical research on illicit flows indicates that there are three types of factors driving illicit flows — macroeconomic, structural, and governance-related.The ratio of illicit outflows to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) averages about 4.8 percent but there is wide variation among LDCs. Of the top 10 countries with the highest illicit flows to GDP ratio, four are small island countries, two are landlocked, and four are neither. In some LDCs, losses through illicit capital flows outpace monies received in official development assistance (ODA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":326708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"73 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2335018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2335018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

本文探讨了48个最不发达国家(LDCs)非法资金流动的规模和构成。非法资金流动涉及腐败所得的跨境转移、违禁品贸易、犯罪活动和逃税。近年来,人们对这种流动可能在多大程度上对发达国家和发展中国家的发展和治理产生有害影响产生了相当大的兴趣。这一问题已被联合国确认为发展和实现千年发展目标的重要问题。在发生非法资本外逃的地方,是调动国内资源促进发展的主要障碍。在许多情况下,它大大减少了可用于千年发展目标和生产能力投资的资源量。国际社会已承诺通过联合国加强国家和多边努力来解决这一问题。随着实现千年发展目标的最后期限越来越近,至关重要的是要更多地了解这一问题的性质,并探讨可能的政策解决办法,特别是对那些偏离千年发展目标最远的国家。该研究的指示性结果发现,来自最不发达国家的非法资金流动从1990年的97亿美元增加到2008年的263亿美元,这意味着经通货膨胀调整后的年增长率为6.2%。保守(下限)估计表明,非法流量已从1990年的79亿美元增加到2008年的202亿美元。十大非法资本出口国占最不发达国家流出总量的63%,而前20大出口国占近83%。贸易错误定价占最不发达国家非法流出的大部分(65- 70%),而且随着对外贸易的增加,错误定价的倾向也在增加。对非法流动的实证研究表明,推动非法流动的因素有三种:宏观经济因素、结构性因素和治理相关因素。非法资金外流占国内生产总值(GDP)的比例平均约为4.8%,但最不发达国家之间差异很大。在非法资金流入与国内生产总值之比最高的前10个国家中,4个是小岛屿国家,2个是内陆国,4个两者都不是。在一些最不发达国家,非法资本流动造成的损失超过了收到的官方发展援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illicit Financial Flows from the Least Developed Countries: 1990-2008
This paper explores the scale and composition of illicit financial flows from the 48 Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Illicit financial flows involve the cross-border transfer of the proceeds of corruption, trade in contraband goods, criminal activities and tax evasion. In recent years, considerable interest has arisen over the extent to which such flows may have a detrimental impact on development and governance in both developed and developing countries alike.This issue has been recognized by the UN as important for development and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Illicit capital flight, where it occurs, is a major hindrance to the mobilization of domestic resources for development. In many cases, it significantly reduces the volume of resources available for investment in the MDGs and productive capacities. Through theUnited Nations, the international community has committed to strengthen national and multilateral efforts to address it. As the deadline for achievement of the MDGs draws closer, it is vital understand more about the nature of this problem and to explore possible policy solutions, especially for those countries furthest off-track towards the MDGs.The study’s indicative results find that illicit financial flows from the LDCs have increased from US $9.7 billion in 1990 to US $26.3 billion in 2008 implying an inflation-adjusted rate of increase of 6.2 percent per annum. Conservative (lower-bound) estimates indicate that illicit flows have increased from US $7.9 billion in 1990 to US $20.2 billion in 2008. The top ten exporters of illicit capital account for 63 percent of total outflows from the LDCs while the top 20 account for nearly 83 percent. Trade mispricing accounts for the bulk (65-70 percent) of illicit outflows from the LDCs, and the propensity for mispricing has increased along with increasing external trade. Empirical research on illicit flows indicates that there are three types of factors driving illicit flows — macroeconomic, structural, and governance-related.The ratio of illicit outflows to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) averages about 4.8 percent but there is wide variation among LDCs. Of the top 10 countries with the highest illicit flows to GDP ratio, four are small island countries, two are landlocked, and four are neither. In some LDCs, losses through illicit capital flows outpace monies received in official development assistance (ODA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Public Sector Wages on Corruption: Wage Inequality Matters The Local Advantage: Corruption, Organized Crime, and Indigenization in the Nigerian Oil Sector The Real Effects of Corruption on Corporate Takeover Activity: Evidence From China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign The Impact of Governance Indicators on Corruption in Arab Countries Corruption and Within-Country Stereotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1