硬膜下血肿体积的测定:计算方法的比较分析

V. V. Vinogradov, B. S. Chubun, D. E. Alekseev, A. Rafaelyan, K. A. Dikikh, D. V. Svistov
{"title":"硬膜下血肿体积的测定:计算方法的比较分析","authors":"V. V. Vinogradov, B. S. Chubun, D. E. Alekseev, A. Rafaelyan, K. A. Dikikh, D. V. Svistov","doi":"10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-23-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Accurate calculation of the volume of subdural hematomas of traumatic, vascular, and other origins during diagnosis is complicated which leads to difficulties in selection of optimal tactics of neurosurgical treatment. Aim. To preform comparative analysis of accuracy of different methods of subdural hematoma volume calculations to increase the quality of evaluation of the results of radiological methods in selection of surgical tactics.Materials and methods. Data from preoperative computed tomography of 20 patients (15 men and 5 women between the ages of 20 and 60 years) with confirmed diagnosis of subdural hematoma who were examined and treated at the Neurosurgery Clinic of the Kirov Military Medical Academy were used. Four groups were formed based of the calculation method: two groups using formulas for volume of ellipsoid or convexo-concave lens (the shape most accurately representing the shape of subdural hematoma); electronic algorithm of volume calculation (Gamma MultiVox D2 software, Gammamed-Soft, Russia); control method (manual sectional calculation of areas of the formed structures with subsequent summation).Results. Deviations between the obtained values varied between +18 and -16 %. Deviations for calculations using ellipsoid volume formula were +46 and -19 %; using convexo-concave lens formula +38 and -35 %, respectively. Electronic calculation algorithm (Gamma MultiVox D2) showed the best accuracy compared to other methods including the control method.Conclusions. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of the studied methods of calculation of subdural hematoma volume showed that median results are statistically similar which allows for selection and use of these methods in accordance with the neurosurgeon's preferences.Study of the algorithm based on ellipsoid volume shows low specificity of this method, comparatively high deviations of the results from the true value with a trend toward overprediction.Calculation using volume of convexo-concave lens showed intermediate result if the shape of the hematoma corresponded to the ideal chape of a figure enclosed between two segments of a sphere. In cases where the shape did not correspond to the convexo-concave lens, both overprediction and underprediction of hematoma volume were observed.Calculations using the Gamma MultiVox D2 software showed the highest accuracy, lowest range of deviation from the control data, best versatility, independence from both the shape and location of the subdural hematoma, as well as selection of a section used in other algorithms for the measurements.It should be noted that accuracy of determination of subdural hematoma volume by the studied methods is directly proportional to time necessary for calculation.","PeriodicalId":197162,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of subdural hematoma volume: Comparative analysis of calculation methods\",\"authors\":\"V. V. Vinogradov, B. S. Chubun, D. E. Alekseev, A. Rafaelyan, K. A. Dikikh, D. V. Svistov\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-23-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Accurate calculation of the volume of subdural hematomas of traumatic, vascular, and other origins during diagnosis is complicated which leads to difficulties in selection of optimal tactics of neurosurgical treatment. Aim. To preform comparative analysis of accuracy of different methods of subdural hematoma volume calculations to increase the quality of evaluation of the results of radiological methods in selection of surgical tactics.Materials and methods. Data from preoperative computed tomography of 20 patients (15 men and 5 women between the ages of 20 and 60 years) with confirmed diagnosis of subdural hematoma who were examined and treated at the Neurosurgery Clinic of the Kirov Military Medical Academy were used. Four groups were formed based of the calculation method: two groups using formulas for volume of ellipsoid or convexo-concave lens (the shape most accurately representing the shape of subdural hematoma); electronic algorithm of volume calculation (Gamma MultiVox D2 software, Gammamed-Soft, Russia); control method (manual sectional calculation of areas of the formed structures with subsequent summation).Results. Deviations between the obtained values varied between +18 and -16 %. Deviations for calculations using ellipsoid volume formula were +46 and -19 %; using convexo-concave lens formula +38 and -35 %, respectively. Electronic calculation algorithm (Gamma MultiVox D2) showed the best accuracy compared to other methods including the control method.Conclusions. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of the studied methods of calculation of subdural hematoma volume showed that median results are statistically similar which allows for selection and use of these methods in accordance with the neurosurgeon's preferences.Study of the algorithm based on ellipsoid volume shows low specificity of this method, comparatively high deviations of the results from the true value with a trend toward overprediction.Calculation using volume of convexo-concave lens showed intermediate result if the shape of the hematoma corresponded to the ideal chape of a figure enclosed between two segments of a sphere. In cases where the shape did not correspond to the convexo-concave lens, both overprediction and underprediction of hematoma volume were observed.Calculations using the Gamma MultiVox D2 software showed the highest accuracy, lowest range of deviation from the control data, best versatility, independence from both the shape and location of the subdural hematoma, as well as selection of a section used in other algorithms for the measurements.It should be noted that accuracy of determination of subdural hematoma volume by the studied methods is directly proportional to time necessary for calculation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-23-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-23-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。在诊断过程中,准确计算外伤性、血管性和其他来源的硬膜下血肿的体积是复杂的,这导致神经外科治疗策略的选择困难。的目标。目的:对不同方法计算硬膜下血肿量的准确性进行比较分析,以提高在手术策略选择中对放射学方法结果的评价质量。材料和方法。本研究使用了基洛夫军事医学院神经外科诊所检查和治疗的确诊为硬膜下血肿的20例患者(15男5女,年龄在20至60岁之间)的术前计算机断层扫描数据。根据计算方法分为四组:两组采用椭球体或凸凹透镜体积公式(形状最能准确代表硬膜下血肿形状);体积计算电子算法(Gamma MultiVox D2软件,Gamma - soft,俄罗斯);控制方法(人工对成形结构面积进行截面计算并进行求和)。结果。所得值之间的偏差在+ 18%和- 16%之间变化。椭球体积公式计算偏差分别为+ 46%和- 19%;采用凸凹透镜公式分别为+ 38%和- 35%。电子计算算法(Gamma MultiVox D2)与其他方法(包括对照法)相比,准确率最高。对所研究的硬膜下血肿体积计算方法的准确性进行比较分析,结果中位数在统计学上是相似的,这使得可以根据神经外科医生的喜好选择和使用这些方法。基于椭球体积的算法研究表明,该方法特异性较低,结果与真实值偏差较大,有过预测的趋势。利用凸凹透镜的体积计算,如果血肿的形状符合球体两段之间的理想形状,则可以得到中间结果。在形状与凸凹透镜不一致的情况下,观察到血肿体积的高估和低估。使用Gamma MultiVox D2软件进行的计算显示出最高的精度,与控制数据的偏差范围最小,通用性最好,与硬膜下血肿的形状和位置无关,并且可以选择其他测量算法中使用的切片。值得注意的是,所研究方法测定硬膜下血肿体积的准确性与计算所需的时间成正比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of subdural hematoma volume: Comparative analysis of calculation methods
Background. Accurate calculation of the volume of subdural hematomas of traumatic, vascular, and other origins during diagnosis is complicated which leads to difficulties in selection of optimal tactics of neurosurgical treatment. Aim. To preform comparative analysis of accuracy of different methods of subdural hematoma volume calculations to increase the quality of evaluation of the results of radiological methods in selection of surgical tactics.Materials and methods. Data from preoperative computed tomography of 20 patients (15 men and 5 women between the ages of 20 and 60 years) with confirmed diagnosis of subdural hematoma who were examined and treated at the Neurosurgery Clinic of the Kirov Military Medical Academy were used. Four groups were formed based of the calculation method: two groups using formulas for volume of ellipsoid or convexo-concave lens (the shape most accurately representing the shape of subdural hematoma); electronic algorithm of volume calculation (Gamma MultiVox D2 software, Gammamed-Soft, Russia); control method (manual sectional calculation of areas of the formed structures with subsequent summation).Results. Deviations between the obtained values varied between +18 and -16 %. Deviations for calculations using ellipsoid volume formula were +46 and -19 %; using convexo-concave lens formula +38 and -35 %, respectively. Electronic calculation algorithm (Gamma MultiVox D2) showed the best accuracy compared to other methods including the control method.Conclusions. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of the studied methods of calculation of subdural hematoma volume showed that median results are statistically similar which allows for selection and use of these methods in accordance with the neurosurgeon's preferences.Study of the algorithm based on ellipsoid volume shows low specificity of this method, comparatively high deviations of the results from the true value with a trend toward overprediction.Calculation using volume of convexo-concave lens showed intermediate result if the shape of the hematoma corresponded to the ideal chape of a figure enclosed between two segments of a sphere. In cases where the shape did not correspond to the convexo-concave lens, both overprediction and underprediction of hematoma volume were observed.Calculations using the Gamma MultiVox D2 software showed the highest accuracy, lowest range of deviation from the control data, best versatility, independence from both the shape and location of the subdural hematoma, as well as selection of a section used in other algorithms for the measurements.It should be noted that accuracy of determination of subdural hematoma volume by the studied methods is directly proportional to time necessary for calculation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can a complete excision of the injured site of the spinal cord lead to positive results? Comparative meta-analysis of implant-associated complications and spinal fusion incidence in Goel-Harms technique and posterior С1-С2 transarticular screw fixation per F. Magerl Primary abscess of the sella turcica of odontogenic nature (observation from practice) Surgical treatment of gangliogliomas in functional areas of the brain in child: a literature review and clinical cases Semyon Ivanovich Shumakov (1913–1995) – founder of the neurosurgical service of the Penza region (to the 110th anniversary of birth)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1