大一工程课程:学科特定vs跨学科方法

Bonnie Boardman, L. Peterson
{"title":"大一工程课程:学科特定vs跨学科方法","authors":"Bonnie Boardman, L. Peterson","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contains a contrast and comparison between two approaches to introductory engineering courses. One approach is for each engineering department to offer its own distinct freshman engineering course independent of all other departments. The other approach is to offer an interdisciplinary freshman engineering course common for all engineering students regardless of department. In order to take advantage of the benefits of each approach a new freshman course has been developed at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). The developmental process from problem identification to final course description will be discussed. Also discussed will be the advantages of the newly developed course as compared to the other structures. Departmental Specific Freshman Courses This section discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each department within the College of Engineering (COE) having its own distinct freshman engineering course. One advantage of this approach is that each department sets the content of their course. This allows each department to teach the skills and tools that will be needed for students to be successful in the chosen discipline. The Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Department, for example, could present a segment in contemporary issues in computer science, while the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department would introduce CAD/CAE applications. Departments could also choose the structure of the course that would best fit the specific departmental objectives. For some departments lab time might be a necessary component while for other departments class lecture time might be a more appropriate format for the course. Again, departments could fit the course to their own objectives.","PeriodicalId":355306,"journal":{"name":"2003 GSW Proceedings","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freshman Engineering Courses: Discipline Specific vs. Interdisciplinary Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Boardman, L. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/1-2-620-38476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contains a contrast and comparison between two approaches to introductory engineering courses. One approach is for each engineering department to offer its own distinct freshman engineering course independent of all other departments. The other approach is to offer an interdisciplinary freshman engineering course common for all engineering students regardless of department. In order to take advantage of the benefits of each approach a new freshman course has been developed at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). The developmental process from problem identification to final course description will be discussed. Also discussed will be the advantages of the newly developed course as compared to the other structures. Departmental Specific Freshman Courses This section discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each department within the College of Engineering (COE) having its own distinct freshman engineering course. One advantage of this approach is that each department sets the content of their course. This allows each department to teach the skills and tools that will be needed for students to be successful in the chosen discipline. The Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Department, for example, could present a segment in contemporary issues in computer science, while the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department would introduce CAD/CAE applications. Departments could also choose the structure of the course that would best fit the specific departmental objectives. For some departments lab time might be a necessary component while for other departments class lecture time might be a more appropriate format for the course. Again, departments could fit the course to their own objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 GSW Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 GSW Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对工程导论课程的两种教学方法进行了对比和比较。一种方法是,每个工程系都开设自己独特的新生工程课程,独立于所有其他系。另一种方法是为所有工程系的学生开设一门跨学科的大一工程课程。为了充分利用每种方法的优势,德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校(UTA)开发了一门新的新生课程。将讨论从问题识别到最终课程描述的发展过程。并将讨论新开发的课程与其他结构相比的优势。本节讨论工程学院(COE)的每个部门都有自己独特的新生工程课程的优点和缺点。这种方法的一个优点是每个系设置他们的课程内容。这使得每个部门都可以教授学生在所选学科中取得成功所需的技能和工具。例如,计算机科学与工程系可以介绍计算机科学的当代问题,而土木与环境工程系将介绍CAD/CAE的应用。各院系也可以选择最适合其特定院系目标的课程结构。对于某些系来说,实验时间可能是必要的组成部分,而对于其他系来说,课堂授课时间可能是更合适的课程形式。同样,院系可以根据自己的目标来调整课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Freshman Engineering Courses: Discipline Specific vs. Interdisciplinary Approaches
This paper contains a contrast and comparison between two approaches to introductory engineering courses. One approach is for each engineering department to offer its own distinct freshman engineering course independent of all other departments. The other approach is to offer an interdisciplinary freshman engineering course common for all engineering students regardless of department. In order to take advantage of the benefits of each approach a new freshman course has been developed at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). The developmental process from problem identification to final course description will be discussed. Also discussed will be the advantages of the newly developed course as compared to the other structures. Departmental Specific Freshman Courses This section discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each department within the College of Engineering (COE) having its own distinct freshman engineering course. One advantage of this approach is that each department sets the content of their course. This allows each department to teach the skills and tools that will be needed for students to be successful in the chosen discipline. The Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Department, for example, could present a segment in contemporary issues in computer science, while the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department would introduce CAD/CAE applications. Departments could also choose the structure of the course that would best fit the specific departmental objectives. For some departments lab time might be a necessary component while for other departments class lecture time might be a more appropriate format for the course. Again, departments could fit the course to their own objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Workshops for Enhancing Implementation of the Field of Study Curriculum for Engineering Education in Texas Initial Experiences Using an Interactive Classroom Participation System (CPS) for Presenting the Iron Cross Biomechanics Module MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN BUILDING ENERGY SYSTEMS OPTION The Impact on Student Learning of Resubmission of Work and Flexible Deadlines Examples from Elements of Theory of Computation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1