利用眼球运动的时空特性对视野缺陷进行分类的研究

A. Grillini, Daniel Ombelet, R. S. Soans, F. Cornelissen
{"title":"利用眼球运动的时空特性对视野缺陷进行分类的研究","authors":"A. Grillini, Daniel Ombelet, R. S. Soans, F. Cornelissen","doi":"10.1145/3204493.3204590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perimetry---assessment of visual field defects (VFD)---requires patients to be able to maintain a prolonged stable fixation, as well as to provide feedback through motor response. These aspects limit the testable population and often lead to inaccurate results. We hypothesized that different VFD would alter the eye-movements in systematic ways, thus making it possible to infer the presence of VFD by quantifying the spatio-temporal properties of eye movements. We developed a tracking test to record participant's eye-movements while we simulated different gaze-contingent VFD. We tested 50 visually healthy participants and simulated three common scotomas: peripheral loss, central loss and hemifield loss. We quantified spatio-temporal features using cross-correlogram analysis, then applied cross-validation to train a decision tree algorithm to classify the conditions. Our test is faster and more comfortable than standard perimetry and can achieve a classifying accuracy of ∼90% (True Positive Rate = ∼98%) with data acquired in less than 2 minutes.","PeriodicalId":237808,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards using the spatio-temporal properties of eye movements to classify visual field defects\",\"authors\":\"A. Grillini, Daniel Ombelet, R. S. Soans, F. Cornelissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3204493.3204590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perimetry---assessment of visual field defects (VFD)---requires patients to be able to maintain a prolonged stable fixation, as well as to provide feedback through motor response. These aspects limit the testable population and often lead to inaccurate results. We hypothesized that different VFD would alter the eye-movements in systematic ways, thus making it possible to infer the presence of VFD by quantifying the spatio-temporal properties of eye movements. We developed a tracking test to record participant's eye-movements while we simulated different gaze-contingent VFD. We tested 50 visually healthy participants and simulated three common scotomas: peripheral loss, central loss and hemifield loss. We quantified spatio-temporal features using cross-correlogram analysis, then applied cross-validation to train a decision tree algorithm to classify the conditions. Our test is faster and more comfortable than standard perimetry and can achieve a classifying accuracy of ∼90% (True Positive Rate = ∼98%) with data acquired in less than 2 minutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

视野检查——评估视野缺陷(VFD)——要求患者能够保持长时间的稳定固定,并通过运动反应提供反馈。这些方面限制了可测试的数量,并经常导致不准确的结果。我们假设不同的VFD会以系统的方式改变眼球运动,从而可以通过量化眼球运动的时空特性来推断VFD的存在。我们开发了一种跟踪测试来记录参与者的眼球运动,同时我们模拟了不同的注视条件下的VFD。我们测试了50名视力健康的参与者,并模拟了三种常见的盲点:外周丧失、中枢丧失和半视野丧失。我们使用交叉相关图分析量化时空特征,然后应用交叉验证来训练决策树算法对条件进行分类。我们的测试比标准的视野检查更快、更舒适,并且可以在不到2分钟的时间内获得数据,分类准确率达到90%(真阳性率= 98%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards using the spatio-temporal properties of eye movements to classify visual field defects
Perimetry---assessment of visual field defects (VFD)---requires patients to be able to maintain a prolonged stable fixation, as well as to provide feedback through motor response. These aspects limit the testable population and often lead to inaccurate results. We hypothesized that different VFD would alter the eye-movements in systematic ways, thus making it possible to infer the presence of VFD by quantifying the spatio-temporal properties of eye movements. We developed a tracking test to record participant's eye-movements while we simulated different gaze-contingent VFD. We tested 50 visually healthy participants and simulated three common scotomas: peripheral loss, central loss and hemifield loss. We quantified spatio-temporal features using cross-correlogram analysis, then applied cross-validation to train a decision tree algorithm to classify the conditions. Our test is faster and more comfortable than standard perimetry and can achieve a classifying accuracy of ∼90% (True Positive Rate = ∼98%) with data acquired in less than 2 minutes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating gender difference on algorithmic problems using eye-tracker Eyemic Gaze patterns during remote presentations while listening and speaking An investigation of the effects of n-gram length in scanpath analysis for eye-tracking research Towards concise gaze sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1