学校书面营养健康政策与观察到的小学营养环境之间的关系

Shadai Martin, J. Meendering, L. McCormack
{"title":"学校书面营养健康政策与观察到的小学营养环境之间的关系","authors":"Shadai Martin, J. Meendering, L. McCormack","doi":"10.30845/jesp.v6n3p8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have demonstrated that written school wellness policies (SWPs) exist, but policies lack comprehensiveness and vary widely in strength of the language used to address mandated components. SWPs should support creating a healthy nutrition environment, however, it is unclear the extent to which they do. The aim of this study was to examine the association between overall quality (strength and comprehensiveness) of written SWPs and the observed physical, situational and policy nutrition environment and specific areas of interest within Midwestern elementary schools. Methods: Twenty-six schools were visited during the 2017-2018 academic year. At each school, SPAN-ET was used to assess the physical, situational and policy environment within the school. Schools were categorized as ‘poor’, ‘fair’, ‘good’ and ‘best’ in each nutrition environment section based on the number of criteria met within specific areas of interest. Written SWPs were scored by two trained researchers, using WellSAT 2.0, prior to the onsite school visit, and strength and comprehensiveness of written SWPs were determined. Results: Strength scores for the nutrition standards section of written SWPs were positively correlated with scores for the observed garden features area of interest (r = .55, p<.01) and comprehensiveness scores for the nutrition education section of written SWPs were negatively correlated with scores for the observed school meals area of interest (r = -.53, p<.05). Mean written SWP nutrition section scores did not vary across observed physical, situational or policy nutrition environment scores, or overall observed nutrition environment score. Conclusion: Examining written SWPs together with the observed school environment can help to identify gaps between how policies are written and how they are being implemented within schools. This information has the potential to shape policy development, implementation and in turn, the school nutrition environment.","PeriodicalId":170810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Written School Nutrition Wellness Policies and the Observed Nutrition Environment within the Elementary Schools\",\"authors\":\"Shadai Martin, J. Meendering, L. McCormack\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/jesp.v6n3p8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Studies have demonstrated that written school wellness policies (SWPs) exist, but policies lack comprehensiveness and vary widely in strength of the language used to address mandated components. SWPs should support creating a healthy nutrition environment, however, it is unclear the extent to which they do. The aim of this study was to examine the association between overall quality (strength and comprehensiveness) of written SWPs and the observed physical, situational and policy nutrition environment and specific areas of interest within Midwestern elementary schools. Methods: Twenty-six schools were visited during the 2017-2018 academic year. At each school, SPAN-ET was used to assess the physical, situational and policy environment within the school. Schools were categorized as ‘poor’, ‘fair’, ‘good’ and ‘best’ in each nutrition environment section based on the number of criteria met within specific areas of interest. Written SWPs were scored by two trained researchers, using WellSAT 2.0, prior to the onsite school visit, and strength and comprehensiveness of written SWPs were determined. Results: Strength scores for the nutrition standards section of written SWPs were positively correlated with scores for the observed garden features area of interest (r = .55, p<.01) and comprehensiveness scores for the nutrition education section of written SWPs were negatively correlated with scores for the observed school meals area of interest (r = -.53, p<.05). Mean written SWP nutrition section scores did not vary across observed physical, situational or policy nutrition environment scores, or overall observed nutrition environment score. Conclusion: Examining written SWPs together with the observed school environment can help to identify gaps between how policies are written and how they are being implemented within schools. This information has the potential to shape policy development, implementation and in turn, the school nutrition environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n3p8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n3p8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,存在书面学校健康政策(SWPs),但这些政策缺乏全面性,并且在处理强制性内容时使用的语言强度差异很大。SWPs应该支持创造一个健康的营养环境,然而,目前尚不清楚它们在多大程度上做到了这一点。本研究的目的是研究在中西部小学中,书面swp的整体质量(强度和综合性)与观察到的物理、情境和政策营养环境以及具体感兴趣的领域之间的关系。方法:在2017-2018学年对26所学校进行访问。在每个学校,SPAN-ET被用来评估学校内的物理、情景和政策环境。学校在每个营养环境部分被分为“差”、“一般”、“好”和“最好”,这是基于在特定领域内满足的标准数量。在现场学校访问之前,由两名训练有素的研究人员使用WellSAT 2.0对书面swp进行评分,并确定书面swp的强度和全面性。结果:书面SWPs营养标准部分的强度得分与观察到的花园特征感兴趣领域得分呈正相关(r = 0.55, p< 0.01),书面SWPs营养教育部分的综合得分与观察到的学校膳食感兴趣领域得分负相关(r = -)。53岁,p < . 05)。SWP营养部分的平均书面得分在观察到的物理、情境或政策营养环境得分或总体观察到的营养环境得分之间没有变化。结论:将书面的社会福利计划与观察到的学校环境结合起来,可以帮助确定政策的制定方式和政策在学校内的实施方式之间的差距。这些信息有可能影响政策的制定和实施,进而影响学校的营养环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between Written School Nutrition Wellness Policies and the Observed Nutrition Environment within the Elementary Schools
Background: Studies have demonstrated that written school wellness policies (SWPs) exist, but policies lack comprehensiveness and vary widely in strength of the language used to address mandated components. SWPs should support creating a healthy nutrition environment, however, it is unclear the extent to which they do. The aim of this study was to examine the association between overall quality (strength and comprehensiveness) of written SWPs and the observed physical, situational and policy nutrition environment and specific areas of interest within Midwestern elementary schools. Methods: Twenty-six schools were visited during the 2017-2018 academic year. At each school, SPAN-ET was used to assess the physical, situational and policy environment within the school. Schools were categorized as ‘poor’, ‘fair’, ‘good’ and ‘best’ in each nutrition environment section based on the number of criteria met within specific areas of interest. Written SWPs were scored by two trained researchers, using WellSAT 2.0, prior to the onsite school visit, and strength and comprehensiveness of written SWPs were determined. Results: Strength scores for the nutrition standards section of written SWPs were positively correlated with scores for the observed garden features area of interest (r = .55, p<.01) and comprehensiveness scores for the nutrition education section of written SWPs were negatively correlated with scores for the observed school meals area of interest (r = -.53, p<.05). Mean written SWP nutrition section scores did not vary across observed physical, situational or policy nutrition environment scores, or overall observed nutrition environment score. Conclusion: Examining written SWPs together with the observed school environment can help to identify gaps between how policies are written and how they are being implemented within schools. This information has the potential to shape policy development, implementation and in turn, the school nutrition environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From RAE to REF: Trust and Atmosphere in UK Higher Education Reform Religious Education of Lifelong Learning in Taiwan Weixin Shengjiao I Ching University The Manifestation of Alienation in Sylvia Plath’s the Bell Jar Female Technology Leaders Overcome Barriers to Climb the US Industry Ladder Debunking Hattie: Evaluating the Contribution of Academic Studies to Policy Development and Implementation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1