几种常用波形失真分析方法的评价与比较

J. Yao, P. Judge, S. Djokic
{"title":"几种常用波形失真分析方法的评价与比较","authors":"J. Yao, P. Judge, S. Djokic","doi":"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates and compares commonly used methods for analysis of waveform distortions in power supply systems, including one new wavelet-based method. The evaluation is performed using a set of selected test waveforms (TWs) that have known waveform distortion characteristics, representing various types of deviations from an ideal sinusoidal waveform with a constant magnitude and frequency. The presented analysis uses both stationary and nonstationary TWs, featuring low and high frequency harmonics, interharmonics and subharmonics, as well as the frequency and magnitude variations of the fundamental and nonfundamental (including dc) components. The capabilities of the considered methods to correctly identify and accurately quantify specific waveform distortion features are evaluated by three general types of error metrics: a) statistical error indices, b) energy-based quantities, and c) waveform-related indicators. The combining of these metrics allows for a more detailed comparison of the original time-domain TWs with the waveforms reconstructed by the different methods. The presented results are part of the efforts to formulate a general methodology for a physically relevant evaluation of accuracy of different methods and specification of standardised test waveforms for a direct and comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of different methods.","PeriodicalId":365235,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of Some Common Methods for Waveform Distortion Analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Yao, P. Judge, S. Djokic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper evaluates and compares commonly used methods for analysis of waveform distortions in power supply systems, including one new wavelet-based method. The evaluation is performed using a set of selected test waveforms (TWs) that have known waveform distortion characteristics, representing various types of deviations from an ideal sinusoidal waveform with a constant magnitude and frequency. The presented analysis uses both stationary and nonstationary TWs, featuring low and high frequency harmonics, interharmonics and subharmonics, as well as the frequency and magnitude variations of the fundamental and nonfundamental (including dc) components. The capabilities of the considered methods to correctly identify and accurately quantify specific waveform distortion features are evaluated by three general types of error metrics: a) statistical error indices, b) energy-based quantities, and c) waveform-related indicators. The combining of these metrics allows for a more detailed comparison of the original time-domain TWs with the waveforms reconstructed by the different methods. The presented results are part of the efforts to formulate a general methodology for a physically relevant evaluation of accuracy of different methods and specification of standardised test waveforms for a direct and comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of different methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对常用的分析供电系统波形畸变的方法进行了评价和比较,其中包括一种新的基于小波的方法。评估使用一组选定的测试波形(TWs)进行,这些波形具有已知的波形失真特性,代表了与具有恒定幅度和频率的理想正弦波形的各种类型的偏差。本分析使用平稳和非平稳TWs,具有低频和高频谐波、间谐波和次谐波,以及基波和非基波(包括直流)分量的频率和幅度变化。所考虑的方法正确识别和准确量化特定波形失真特征的能力通过三种一般类型的误差度量来评估:a)统计误差指标,b)基于能量的量,c)波形相关指标。这些指标的结合可以更详细地比较原始时域波与通过不同方法重建的波形。所提出的结果是制定一种通用方法的一部分,用于对不同方法的准确性进行物理相关评估,并对不同方法进行直接和全面的比较和基准测试的标准化测试波形规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation and Comparison of Some Common Methods for Waveform Distortion Analysis
This paper evaluates and compares commonly used methods for analysis of waveform distortions in power supply systems, including one new wavelet-based method. The evaluation is performed using a set of selected test waveforms (TWs) that have known waveform distortion characteristics, representing various types of deviations from an ideal sinusoidal waveform with a constant magnitude and frequency. The presented analysis uses both stationary and nonstationary TWs, featuring low and high frequency harmonics, interharmonics and subharmonics, as well as the frequency and magnitude variations of the fundamental and nonfundamental (including dc) components. The capabilities of the considered methods to correctly identify and accurately quantify specific waveform distortion features are evaluated by three general types of error metrics: a) statistical error indices, b) energy-based quantities, and c) waveform-related indicators. The combining of these metrics allows for a more detailed comparison of the original time-domain TWs with the waveforms reconstructed by the different methods. The presented results are part of the efforts to formulate a general methodology for a physically relevant evaluation of accuracy of different methods and specification of standardised test waveforms for a direct and comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of different methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reduced 2nd Harmonic Input Current Ripple Quasi Z-source Microinverter for On-Grid PV Power Conversion A Review of Shore Infrastructures for Electric Ferries Advanced Edge Computing Framework for Grid Power Quality Monitoring of Industrial Motor Drive Applications Stability Studies of Power Systems for More Electric Aircraft An Optimal Sliding-Integral-Derivative (SID) Control of a Grid-Tied Multilevel Inverter under Parameters Mismatch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1